On this week's podcast edition of Supreme Court Brief, host Jimmy Hoover discusses last Wednesday's hearing in Trump v. Cook on whether President Donald Trump can fire a member of the Federal Reserve, with insights from legal scholar Jane Manners.
Attorney Lee Gelernt, representing individuals deported under the Alien Enemies Act, said the law is “very clear” that it can only be used by a president when there is an invasion or incursion—and courts can review whether that standard has been met.
U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer has accused California of using racial considerations to draw a new map handing Democrats additional safe congressional seats, which was adopted in response to a similar effort by Texas Republicans.
A federal judge in Manhattan refused to undo a Securities and Exchange Commission settlement with Mango Labs, finding that evolving crypto enforcement policies do not alter binding final judgments.
Amid an athlete's name, image and likeness obligations to a college, Duke's suit raises questions about legal remedies a school can use to limit that player's mobility.
The suits challenge the conventional thinking that because employers don't pay any of the costs of the coverage, they don't have a fiduciary to ensure workers are getting their money's worth.
"At this stage, plaintiffs' allegations that users want compensation and competitors have continually attempted rewards schemes is sufficient to plausibly allege that search engines would compete on price in a but-for world," U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin wrote in an order allowing antitrust class-action claims to proceed against Google in California federal court.
The report shows that since the plan became effective Jan. 3, 2025, the estate has transferred $8.61 billion in cash, securities and other property to creditors, paying administrative, secured and priority claims in full and distributing about 68% of allowed general unsecured claims.