HTTP/2 301
x-redirect-by: WordPress
x-content-type-options: nosniff
location: https://lastwordonnothing.com/
cache-control: max-age=0
expires: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:06:53 GMT
host-header: c2hhcmVkLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
content-length: 0
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:06:53 GMT
server: Apache
HTTP/2 200
link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/"
x-content-type-options: nosniff
cache-control: max-age=0
expires: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:06:54 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
host-header: c2hhcmVkLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:06:54 GMT
server: Apache
The Last Word On Nothing - "Science says the first word on everything, and the last word on nothing" - Victor Hugo
I’m writing a book about mountain lions and it’s down to weeks, days, pages flying, margins scratched and scribbled, when news comes of a 46-year-old woman killed by such a cat a couple hundred miles from where I live. She’d been hiking alone on New Year’s Day, forensics consistent with a mountain lion attack, asphyxiation with no puncture wounds, very little blood, meaning the lion had her throat in its jaws and closed off her airway, one of its go-to kill tactics.
The winter has been dry, little snow on the ground where tracks would have offered evidence as to how this encounter played out, how long the two of them might have danced, the woman’s heart racing, the cat feinting from side to side, trying to decide how to approach its prey. When her body was found by two hikers, the cat was still present. They threw rocks and shouted and it fled. A physician in the pair ran up and found there was no pulse, the woman was dead, the first human fatality from a mountain lion in the state of Colorado in 27 years.
I stop my work and sit still in the pointillist light coming into the house. Outside, high desert junipers and piñon pines press against the waking sky and I think of how scared she must have been when it happened. If there’s not an ounce of air left in your lungs and you’ve fought with everything you had, I like to think there’s a peace that comes over you, a resignation that must be a relief after a lifetime of working at being alive. It’s what you hear from those who survive drownings: in the final moments they don’t mind so much, it’s kind of pleasant, almost euphoric. This is how I make peace with the news of the woman’s death.
I feel like I’m always saying this, but: it was a weird start to the year. This year, I actually gave myself permission to *not* celebrate New Year’s, that is, I didn’t have to start a new program or a new calendar system, make a fresh start or be a new me.It was a relief. This week the pear trees on our street started blooming and I remembered this post. Tomorrow I’ll look for cormorants, and try to remember to celebrate the unsettled, unsettling beauty of the middle.
*
We often celebrate the beginnings of things, and the ends of things, but what about the middles? The middle can be a gray place, either boring or too eventful in all the wrong ways. That’s what this part of the year feels like to me– I’m missing the cozy days of early winter, where candles are a welcome novelty, when the early dark gives you reason to curl up with a book for an evening. Now, the days are a little longer, but not long enough for me to really enjoy the extra hours of daylight, only enough so that I feel like I’m struggling to keep up.
There’s a little bit of what could be hope out there—a handful of pear trees have started to push out white blossoms—but looming right behind them is an atmospheric river coming to grab the flowers by the fistful and smash them into the street. We’re just hovering here between the winter solstice and the spring equinox, and sometimes it feels like this is the year the balance just won’t tip toward the light. No wonder Punxsutawney Phil has trouble predicting how soon spring will come, when, like the rest of us, the groundhog is stuck in the middle of winter. (The groundhog’s forecasts, NOAA reports, have been right about 40 percent of the time during the last 10 years.)
A friend calls it Goddamned January and she has good reasons — intensive caregiving and difficult health decisions — to hate it. My reasons for hating it are also personal — my son and husband both died in Januaries — but I have case against it that’s general and over the years I have backed the case with evidence.
In 2020, I was getting over a bad bad cold and being comforted by snowdrops. In retrospect, even if that bad cold was not the just-discovered covid — which wasn’t even being tested for — I had no idea, none whatsoever, neither did anyone else, that January was just the beginning and things were about to get unthinkably worse, in fact, to blow snowdrops right out of the water.
In 2023 and 2024, January was getting tired of covid and fixing its wicked eye on infrastructure, that is, water pipes and gas lines and electric lines were blowing up and leaking and fritzing out left, right, and center, Baltimore was covered with snow and frigidity, and local freezing semi-isolated Baltimoreans hunkered down for an urban apocalypse, we were used to it by now. The neighborhood kids put on turquoise snowpants and dug themselves into caves; they made it seem like an option.
Currently January of 2026 is lying low, though it has lain low before and might be ramping up. Locally, it’s disrupting work schedules with broken websites and giving neighbors some kind of non-lethal but lingering flu. Nationally, it’s horrific, I ashamed of my country, I can’t even imagine people say these things and act like this, I’m ashamed of the whole damn species. The national horrificity could easily get local, we’re not immune and snowdrops and turquoise snowpants aren’t going to work any more. It’s time for the big guns.
U.S. military personnel at Camp Century, the “city under the ice” in northern Greenland, circa 1960. (U.S. Army photo)
At the height of the last Cold War the U.S. military burrowed into a glacier in northernmost Greenland and installed a nuclear reactor. The reactor was small—“experimental,” the army called it—and designed to power a base that had also been built under the ice. The base was called Camp Century, and it could house up to 200 scientists and military personnel in several tomb-like tunnels. While there wasn’t much to do in the “city under the ice” aside from work, sleep, and eat, its residents lived in relative comfort, considering, of course, that they were inside a glacier at the top of the world.
There were showers and meals made hot by atomic power, there were bunk beds, a gym and a library. During the days, while scientists conducted research in one region of the base, engineers working in another began drilling down into the ice, to see how just how deep they might go. When I researched Camp Century last year for a piece I was working on, an ice base veteran named Austin Kovacs told me he’d never felt weird living there, so close to the reactor.
Every day, he told me, soldiers walked through the base swinging Geiger counters back and forth, like priests toting censers, listening for the uptight ticks or flat-out screech that would indicate trouble. But these sounds never came, and so the soldiers’ routine passage through the tunnels, the calm sweep of their counters in the darkness, came to feel like some kind of safety.
Lately I’ve been thinking a lot of that story. With Greenland in the news, with fresh threats and bullying pouring out of the White House each day. What it all says about who we are, what we’ll do. Would the U.S. really try to take Greenland, or buy it? Would we really invade?
The president says America “needs” Greenland for security reasons, but as a few reporters have noted, old agreements between the U.S. and the Kingdom of Denmark (which Greenland is still part of) already allow the American military great latitude when it comes to defending itself, NATO, and Greenland. There were, during the middle years of the last Cold War, several American military bases and airfields on the massive island. Camp Century, with its sketchy reactor and sci-fi vibes, was merely the strangest of them.
And yet no takeover or annexation was necessary for the construction of any of those bases—not even for the creation of a subglacial nuclear-powered one. Maybe it goes without saying that the Danes were not pleased to learn of Camp Century, and the Inuit, who make up the majority of the island’s population, were never asked for their consent. The U.S. simply went ahead and did what it wanted—what it thought would be cool. All this is to say that when the president suggests Greenland should be invaded or otherwise overtaken for “security” reasons, it is nothing more than a lie. And yet this word, security, has been repeated so often by politicians and the media that one day soon, if we are not very careful, it may become a chant, a refrain, reassuring as the soft tick of Geiger counter in a tunnel under the ice.
One by one most of America’s Cold War bases in Greenland were shut down as the threat of war with the Soviet Union lessened, or changed shape. In 1964 Camp Century’s nuclear reactor was fished up from the ice and hauled back to the States for burial somewhere out West. A few years later the base was abandoned. Much of the infrastructure—and a great many tons of radioactive wastewater, along with human and chemical waste—was simply left in place, to be slowly absorbed by the glacier. When Austin Kovacs went back to survey Camp Century a couple years after it was shut down
“… he found [it was] a total ruin. In a series of photographs he made of the base, one can see something like a mining disaster unfolding in slow motion. Tongues of snow spill down passageways. Steel structures collapse on themselves. Wood beams splinter like bones. The photos give form to the glacier’s overwhelming and otherwise invisible weight. Humans had been gone only a short time, but already there was the suggestion of an inevitable one-way journey—the debris being crushed, then swallowed, never to rise again.”
Kovacs and his survey team were the last humans to visit the site. After they left, the base vanished into the ice and was all but forgotten for half a century. When I first began writing about it, I thought of Camp Century as a sort of time capsule, hidden away beneath the ice, a cluster of artifacts waiting to resurface and remind us of our folly.
Now I see the story as an American parable, one among many, all of them linked to the one we’re living through now. When I asked Kovacs if he’d ever told his children stories of his life under the ice he thought for a moment and said No. When I asked why, he couldn’t say.
My first week on a real journalism job in Yellowknife, 20 years ago, my boss took me to see the old Giant Mine site. It wasn’t among the tourist traps of the Northwest Territories, but he felt this was a place I needed to understand if I was going to report on industry in the North. Inside, the crew quarters looked like Pompeii–everything from papers to work boots left in place, though scattered–but when we started climbing the decayed stairs inside the head frame, they were so rickety even our twenty-something bravado met its limits.
Last month, Canadian Geographic called me up and asked me to investigate the Northern mine’s legacy after I wrote a feature for them on Ontario’s Ring of Fire mineral region. Now, after 10 years away from Yellowknife and 20 years since that early magazine job led me to Giant Mine, I’m going back to see what all has changed.
Gold mining was the original reason our city existed, and diamond mining was a reason it endured. But Giant Mine, in particular, was a gold mine that left a complex legacy in the form of 237,000 tons of arsenic trioxide. At the time I visited the site, it was loosely piled in the rough-blasted chambers degrading under our feet, with water seeping in and out. 237,000 tons is enough trioxide to kill the world’s population several times over, and it sat squarely within city limits. The permafrost that had frozen it in place for decades had melted when they added open pits to the mine.
Carving the Grand Canyon was slow.(Photo by Laura Helmuth)
Bad things happen quickly; good things take time. This isn’t a perfect pattern, of course, but I think it’s real and worth thinking about.
A wildfire, explosion, earthquake, pandemic, gunshot, car crash, heart attack—all fast. Cancer typically starts out slow but then gets fast. Climate change seems slow, but the reason it’s so dangerous is that, from a geological, evolutionary, and cultural perspective, it’s fast.
Some good things are fast. A joke, an insight, a rare bird sighting. Someone runs into a burning building and saves a child.
But most good things are slow, and that’s especially true for science. It took the longitudinal Framingham Heart Study, which started in 1948 and is still going, to identify the biggest risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Long-term datasets like the Keeling Curve, documenting atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from Mauna Loa, Hawai’i, provide some of the best evidence for anthropogenic climate change. (Withdrawing its funding, as the Trump administration threatens to do, is fast.) Drug development is slow. Restoring endangered species is slow. Restoring ecosystems is slow. Designing, building, launching, receiving and analyzing data from, and then sharing images from a space mission to Saturn? Slow.
Those of us who cover science sometimes gripe about the embargo system and the power of a small number of research journals to determine the news. (The embargo system is an agreement between journals like Science or Nature and credentialed journalists. We get a few days’ notice of what they’re publishing, which gives us a chance to contact outside experts for context and do decent reporting (ideally) before publishing a story when the next edition of the journal comes out.) But what the embargo system, and the scientific publishing system in general, give us is a way to make something slow, fast. To make it “news.”
It typically takes many years for paleontologists to find a fossil, extract it, date it, determine its taxonomy, document their case that it’s a new species, submit a report to a journal, go through peer review and editing, and finally publish their results. The headline? “Enormous New Pterosaur Discovered,” like it happened yesterday.
The news has a bias for what’s new, and that’s one reason why good and slow things are under-understood and underappreciated. Smoking-related death rates have declined dramatically, but not so quickly that it counts much as news. Thank you, by the way, to all the researchers, advocates, and journalists who shared the truth about smoking’s dangers despite highly-funded merchants of doubt. That took a long time, longer than it should have. And thanks to everyone who fought to get smoking banned from airplanes, restaurants, office buildings—we should build monuments to you.
It’s not just the news that has a bias for short-term thinking. Venture capitalists and even philanthropies want to launch a shiny new thing, but often pull funding prematurely to go fund the next shiny new thing. Politicians are always looking at quick wins to highlight during their next election campaign. Funding research, education, public health, infrastructure and other long-term investments are better for their constituents but don’t get the appreciation they deserve.
A lot of bad things are happening right now, quickly. It takes forever to set up life-saving clinical trials, but no time at all for sociopaths to stop them. It takes a lot of effort to suppress dangerous diseases like measles, and no time at all for sociopaths to spread lies about them. It takes a lot of time to build up a federal workforce with experience and expertise, and no time at all for sociopaths to fire them. The people who move fast and break things are some of the most dangerous people alive. The rest of us, as much as we can, must try to stop them, to fix things, to move slow and build things.
This post first ran in the spring of 2015 and I’ve often wondered if this patch of earth in Iowa is still guarded.
A summer not long ago I went for a grueling 3-day backpack through GMO cornfields in Iowa, camping among walls of waxy green leaves that sawed against each other in the breeze. I wanted to see what besides corn and soybeans lived out here. Not much, I found. Spiders and ants were few and only the smallest species survived. There were some mushrooms, but not many, and I happened into a whitetail deer one night. Otherwise, it was a catastrophic biological landscape, as if a bomb had gone off killing almost everything but a couple engineered species.
Thrashing out of the hot, dripping fields, my skin coated in sweat and grimy soil the consistency of shoe polish, I set off looking for signs of biologic hope in the area. I ended up at small patch of what is called virgin prairie, a plot of ground near the forgotten town of Butler Center where crops had never been planted. The town itself was gone, plowed under and turned into rows of corn, while this plot called the Clay Hills Preserve had been set aside. No plow had ever touched the ground.
Ruth Haan, a woman in her eighties, was one of the last on a board of volunteers overseeing the preserve. Locals warned me that Haan was losing her mental faculties. Her niece who drove her to the site to meet me on a blistering summer day said right in front of her that she was getting a little loopy.
“Oh, honey, I just need a little help now and then,” Haan said in her sundress, the fat of her arms hanging like handbags.
Haan pushed her wheeled walker across bumpy ground to reach the fence marking the refuge that she’d known her entire life. “Volunteers haven’t met for quite a while because most of us have died,” she said. “I sure hope someone will keep an eye on this after I’m gone; it’s the last piece around.”