| CARVIEW |
The IMF just raised its global growth forecast to 3.3%. It also explained why that number depends almost entirely on AI investment continuing, and what happens if the productivity gains never arrive. The fund's own model shows the upgrade could vanish twice over.
While OpenAI and Anthropic chase AGI, a wave of specialized AI tools hit the market solving problems the big labs ignored. Ten standouts from late 2025 reveal where the real value is being built: integrations, workflows, and trust.
Musk sues OpenAI for $134 billion on a $38 million donation. Trial starts April 27. Meanwhile, a solo developer built the AI memory layer that Big Tech keeps promising but never ships. Control vs. clarity. Both bets land this spring.
VibeCoding - Learn to code through music and rhythm. Build real projects while jamming to beats. Turn programming into a creative, engaging experience that makes complex concepts stick. Code to the vibe.
A week of automation work delivered garbage. Thirty minutes rebuilding it as a Claude Code skill delivered results. The difference explains why most engineers are using AI coding tools wrong, and what skills actually solve.
Anthropic's multi-agent Claude Code lets developers run five AI assistants simultaneously. Early adopters report 10x productivity gains. The token bills tell a different story about who really benefits from autonomous overnight coding.
Mistral's Devstral 2 matches trillion-parameter rivals with just 123B parameters. The engineering is real. So is the license that bars companies over $240M revenue from using it freely. Europe's "open source" champion has some explaining to do.
Hugging Face's Skills tool lets Claude fine-tune competing models for thirty cents. A 7B parameter cap and subscription fees complicate the democratization pitch. The deeper issue: access to a button isn't access to understanding.
OpenAI's Codex-Max cuts tokens 30%, runs 42% faster. But compaction's opacity, Windows optimization signaling Microsoft alignment, and API delays reveal infrastructure gaps. Efficiency gains mask cost pressure in competitive squeeze.
Cursor raised $2.3 billion at a $29.3 billion valuation while paying billions to the same AI companies now competing against it. The fastest-growing startup in tech history faces a choice: become a model company or accept structural disadvantage.
Cursor's new AI agents complete coding tasks in 30 seconds—four times faster than rivals. The same day, Forrester found 45% of AI-generated code has security flaws. The velocity gap between agent speed and vulnerability detection is widening fast.
Google launched vibe coding tools in October while usage data showed the market had already peaked and crashed. AI code generation works for simple demos but breaks on complex projects—a training distribution wall platforms can't market around.
Google released a browser automation agent days after OpenAI, choosing narrower scope over desktop control. The bet: faster, more reliable web tasks matter more than operating system reach. Internal use proves it works. External adoption will test the claim.
Zhipu AI releases GLM-4.6 with MIT-licensed weights and something unusual: complete test logs from 74 coding evaluations. The pitch is 15% fewer tokens than its predecessor at 90% lower cost than Claude—but with caveats on where it actually leads.
Anthropic ships checkpoints, VS Code integration, and an agent SDK with Claude Sonnet 4.5—betting developer tooling matters more than benchmark wins. As frontier models converge on capability, deployment polish becomes the real competitive moat.
OpenAI launches GPT-5-Codex with dynamic reasoning that works autonomously for 7+ hours, targeting GitHub Copilot in the $500M+ AI coding market. The specialized model promises enterprise appeal but faces fierce competition from Cursor and Claude Code.
Get the 5-minute Silicon Valley AI briefing, every weekday morning — free.
