| CARVIEW |
Pages
January 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Archives
- March 2015 (1)
- May 2011 (52)
- April 2011 (50)
- March 2011 (70)
- February 2011 (63)
- January 2011 (66)
- December 2010 (63)
- November 2010 (62)
- October 2010 (69)
- September 2010 (53)
- August 2010 (51)
- July 2010 (62)
- June 2010 (83)
- May 2010 (76)
- April 2010 (67)
- March 2010 (66)
- February 2010 (77)
- January 2010 (84)
- December 2009 (86)
- November 2009 (81)
- October 2009 (100)
- September 2009 (81)
- August 2009 (82)
- July 2009 (81)
- June 2009 (80)
- May 2009 (88)
- April 2009 (98)
- March 2009 (100)
- February 2009 (98)
- January 2009 (117)
- December 2008 (98)
- November 2008 (80)
- October 2008 (61)
- September 2008 (84)
- August 2008 (80)
- July 2008 (96)
- June 2008 (82)
- May 2008 (104)
- April 2008 (109)
- March 2008 (90)
- February 2008 (97)
- January 2008 (99)
- December 2007 (77)
- November 2007 (71)
- October 2007 (95)
- September 2007 (70)
- August 2007 (100)
- July 2007 (107)
- June 2007 (88)
- May 2007 (86)
- April 2007 (96)
- March 2007 (113)
- February 2007 (104)
- January 2007 (103)
- December 2006 (83)
- November 2006 (69)
- October 2006 (95)
- September 2006 (86)
- August 2006 (14)
Blog Stats
- 4,865,974 hits
-
Recent Posts
- THIS BLOG HAS MOVED
- Welcome to the new version of The Wildlife News!
- Megaloads video: Giant rig opponents say its your land, water and air versus Exxon
- Have you come across any interesting wildlife news? May 29, 2011
- Republican’s Climate Solution: Clear-Cut the Rain Forest
- Renewable Energy Industry CEO looks to the future
- Niemeyer’s “Wolfer” wins prestigious book award
- Montana FWP wants local anti-bison judge replaced on Gardiner Basin bison case
- A chance to finally get rid of tumbleweed?
- Coyotes nail dog during Colorado hike
- Attempt to restore hound hunting of cougar in Oregon fails
- Scientists debate ‘magic number’ of wolves needed for species’ survival
- Winter Visitor in Leadore
- Teff Tiff
- Idaho Fish & Game Commission framework for wolf management
Categories of stories in this blog
B.L.M. Bears Bighorn sheep Bison brucellosis cattle Climate change conservation Deer Delisting domestic sheep Elk endangered species act energy Fish Forest Service Grazing and livestock Idaho Idaho wolves Mexican wolves mining Montana wolves Motor vehicles wildlife mountain ranges national parks oil and gas Poaching politics predator control privatization public lands public lands management Trees Forests Uncategorized water issues wildcats wilderness roadless wildfire Wildfires wildlife disease Wildlife Habitat Wolf dispersal wolf hunt Wolves Wolves and Livestock Wolves and prey Wyoming wolves Yellowstone Yellowstone National Park Yellowstone wolves
Alan Gregory’s Conservation News- Marine life on a warming planet
- Oklahoma, where the denial comes right before the drought
- Plants will be hard put to handle greenhouse gases, scientists say
- The quote of the week
- Appeal filed over Blair Mountain strip mining in W.Va.
- Dr. James Hansen: Climate change is happening now
- The pledge of wildlands
- Prairie dog disease confirmed in South Dakota
- NASA: Ice sheet decline at both poles increasing
- An area of Arctic ice bigger than the U.S. melted this year
Technorati authority
Blog comment rules
If you haven’t commented before, read this.
This blog is moderated.You can contact webmaster Ralph Maughan at rmaughan2@cableone.net. The other webmasters are Ken Cole and Brian Ertz.
Your first comments to this blog go directly into the moderation box and must be approved by the webmaster. Every day new people are approved. About every two weeks someone is disapproved.
After your first comment is approved, your future comments might appear automatically. Permission to comment might be revoked for any reason.
Due to the controversial nature of the issues discussed, hard experience tells that a completely open forum would be a string of insults. We don’t want this to be a forum for free floating emotion. There are quite a few strangers who show up and post a troll. They are usually removed unless posting them would seem to bring the embarrassment they deserve.
We can see your email address, the screen name you use, and your IP number. Readers can only see your screen name and any link to your web page you elect to provide. Although potentially libelous comments are removed, you are legally responsible for them should we fail to locate them.
Please use a valid email address. If we find it is a fake, you will not be able to post anymore. We sometimes try to email new commenter before their comment is allowed through to see if it’s a valid address. Do not try to fool people by using different screen names and fake email addresses, your IP number doesn’t change. We can see what you are doing. The same is true should you issue a threat to someone.
We’ve found that people who think their comments won’t be let through are more likely to use a fake email address. So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Ever since stronger moderation has been used to guide this blog, readership has gone up (doubled), so it appears to be effective.
Note too that spam, which you will rarely see, is an ever present problem with all blogs, especially those with more readers like this one. Hundreds of spam posts are often received here daily. WordPress (the host of this blog) uses a routine (Akismet) to automatically try to detect spam. Akismet yields more false positives than false negatives. In other words, your comments can unintentionally end up in the spam queue. The best way to avoid this is not to have more than one hyperlink in your comments. Multiple hyperlinks are a leading characteristic of spam sent to blogs.
We try to go through the spam and pull out valid comments, but when faced with reading through a couple hundred unpleasant attempts to take you to porn sites, lead you to web pages that try to download a Trojan horse, or sell you dubious products, this task is often beyond our patience.
While Ralph Maughan is the primary webmaster; Ken Cole frequently moderates and posts. The Wildlife News is supported by the Western Watersheds Project by the provision of one of its employees as webmaster. The Wolf Recovery Foundation also participates.
Ralph Maughan
5 Responses to “Blog comment rules”
Leave a comment Cancel reply
Top Posts
Recent comments
william huard on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… Ryan on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… william huard on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… WM on Megaloads video: Giant rig opp… Ryan on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… jdubya on Megaloads video: Giant rig opp… JEFF E on Have you come across any inter… JB on Republican’s Climate Solution:… william huard on Have you come across any inter… Peter Kiermeir on Have you come across any inter…
Buffalo Field Campaign Blog- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Demarcated Landscapes- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Academic
Blogroll
energy
Places
Wolves
Yellowstone
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

September 13, 2010 at 10:54 AM
We moved the rules for commenting on the blog to this separate page so they would not be so intrusive.
We hope to keep it here unless it looks like those who want to comment are not aware of them.
December 3, 2010 at 7:14 AM
Note. If you comment on this page, please keep you comment on the rules of the blog rather than other matters.
February 26, 2011 at 1:54 PM
Ralph or Ken
What happened to New Yellowstone Park Superintendent Now at Work topic for Feb 24th? I can’t seem to find it anywhere? what does it mean when comments are closed? Does the entire article get taken down, when no more comments are accepted? A little confused here. Thanks.
February 26, 2011 at 1:56 PM
There may have been some hostility from members to one another, so the comment portion got closed. Just my guess as to what happened, but I am not 100% sure.
March 5, 2011 at 12:39 PM
I live in Sand Canyon near the mouth. Four investors want to put in 17 to 22 476 foot turbines within 500 feet of our properties, and into Cache Creek, a waterway watershed that flows into Mojave as their water source. We already hear hundreds of turbines that have gone in and continue to increase in size and numbers. The noise and light trespass and pollution has completely taken the night sky away. LADWP has either bought BLM land or is leasing it to put turbines into Pine Canyon, just above us. Helicopters are surveying the hills, from Proctor Lake through to Twin Oaks. We are seeing them daily to weekly now. We, the people, have not given Kern County, LADWP or investors the permission to wreck our lives and the ecosystems that support man’s survival. Kern County may be the place where this century’s American Revolution begins. I know all about Ivanpah from research a few years ago and fully support the lawsuit. Industrial wind and solar costs the taxpayers fully: 30% of the total cost of developing those company’s solar, wind and geothermal plant. They need to leave peacefully. 90% of fossil fuel emissions must be decreased today for man to survive. Those antiquated technologies do not contribute to meeting this vital goal. This is survival and it will NOT be tolerated for County greed to interfere with my survival. The lawsuits will continue and will begin being target directly and very personally at the members of the Board of Supervisors and members of Kern County planning. It is not their legal role to destroy habitat, endangered species, remove our ample fresh water supply or the water supply for those habitats that support man’s survival.