SIMPLE STEPS TO TURNING A BLUE STATE RED
posted by UMRBlog @ 19:29
2 comments
| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
expires: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 13:53:52 GMT
date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 13:53:52 GMT
cache-control: private, max-age=0
last-modified: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:36:14 GMT
etag: W/"4eece92bc13fade0333ab2ceeac7f702b2fbbd9ba936a081f0961a89d09348e3"
content-encoding: gzip
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
content-length: 11402
server: GSE
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000
UMRBlog: October 2010
A few default propositions, developed over time:
Very seldom is the candidate the most attractive option for thirty seconds of TV. Limit the talking head, suitable for mounting, and show other relevant stuff. Five or six seconds will usually do it.
Nose hair trimmers are very useful tools in preparing for a TV shoot.
If your audio from TV is the same as your radio, your radio copy is weak, your TV video is weak or both of the above. TV sound is supposed to supplement the video, not stand alone.
I am in mourning for 60 second radio spots. A candidate can do a lot of education early in a campaign with a good 60.
I have never understood why producers work so hard to make female candidates look like they are ready for a knife fight. An otherwise attractive woman doesn't have to look or act like GI Joe to espouse her beliefs effectively.
A montage or slideshow of still pictures can really make a good TV ad, with the proper voice-over. I remember a congressional race where the outsider beat the insider with a video scrapbook of closed plants.
There are those who say that radio has lost its effectiveness because so many people listen to satellite, pound in their Ipods or talk on the phone. I am not one of them. The trick is figuring out how radio gets you in touch with registered voters or, better yet, likely voters. Arbitrons tell you "how many" but you have to drill down for the "who are they?"
In the really, really bad category, I'd place Asher and Munzlinger.
In the really, really good category, I'd place the Schilling Intro ad.
In the (I just made this one up) Best CounterPuncher category, I'd put Wes Shoemeyer. This guy's first effort out of the box is always generic and eminently foregettable. He lives to be attacked so he can deftly counterpunch. His media guys must be ju-jitsu trained to use the other guy's momentum against him.
Probably 80% of local elections are decided before the campaign money is spent. They are decided by things like incumbency, prior elective office, political demographics of a district and the flavor at the top of both tickets (in presidential years). The ones where advertising makes a difference and moves undecideds are fascinating things to watch. When Verne Hagstrom won by 27 votes, it is impossible to say the pictures of the holes in the water plant and the police cars up on blocks did not play into Candidate Hagstrom's "capital planning" campaign. When Cawthorn beat Clayton in the Special Senate Election, the determinant was not the skill of the ads, it was their timing. Each candidate was a relative stranger in the other side of the Senate district. Cawthorn strenuously introduced himself during the Christmas season while a lot of people were home watching TV. Nobody thought Cawthorn would intrude on people's Holidays, but he did. Clayton then put out some catch-up introductory ads but, by that time, Cawthorn had moved on to attacking Clayton. Ironically, a lot of people now think the formula for a winning ad over there is "a gun and a dog." That was never the point. The winning point was define your opponent in relation to yourself (in this case quite unfairly) early.
Blunt may win the Senate Seat in Missouri but I sure don't get the point of his TV campaign. "Vote for me because I'm not her..(meaning Pelosi, not Carnahan).
Gosh, just think: In a week it'll all be over and anyone looking for strategy will have to watch College Football.
No, there is no door prize.
Was not making a statement or sitting out the election. Just enjoying my not-so-little Buddy.
UMRBlog
The Upper Mississippi River Basin:Life, Worship, Sports, Transportation, Golf, Politics and other bizarre behaviors in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. The Quincy area has a history of tolerance. We seem to suffer fools gladly.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
RANDOM THOUGHTS ON POLITICAL ADS
I happen to love watching, reading and listening to political ads. I remember during the '08 election I was in the Carolinas and was always late for supper watching the local ads and non-canned congressional ads. I've produced a few good ones and a few not-so-good ones. The only one I've ever done that won an award was in a campaign where my candidate got swamped. The operation was a success but the patient died.
A few default propositions, developed over time:
Very seldom is the candidate the most attractive option for thirty seconds of TV. Limit the talking head, suitable for mounting, and show other relevant stuff. Five or six seconds will usually do it.
Nose hair trimmers are very useful tools in preparing for a TV shoot.
If your audio from TV is the same as your radio, your radio copy is weak, your TV video is weak or both of the above. TV sound is supposed to supplement the video, not stand alone.
I am in mourning for 60 second radio spots. A candidate can do a lot of education early in a campaign with a good 60.
I have never understood why producers work so hard to make female candidates look like they are ready for a knife fight. An otherwise attractive woman doesn't have to look or act like GI Joe to espouse her beliefs effectively.
A montage or slideshow of still pictures can really make a good TV ad, with the proper voice-over. I remember a congressional race where the outsider beat the insider with a video scrapbook of closed plants.
There are those who say that radio has lost its effectiveness because so many people listen to satellite, pound in their Ipods or talk on the phone. I am not one of them. The trick is figuring out how radio gets you in touch with registered voters or, better yet, likely voters. Arbitrons tell you "how many" but you have to drill down for the "who are they?"
In the really, really bad category, I'd place Asher and Munzlinger.
In the really, really good category, I'd place the Schilling Intro ad.
In the (I just made this one up) Best CounterPuncher category, I'd put Wes Shoemeyer. This guy's first effort out of the box is always generic and eminently foregettable. He lives to be attacked so he can deftly counterpunch. His media guys must be ju-jitsu trained to use the other guy's momentum against him.
Probably 80% of local elections are decided before the campaign money is spent. They are decided by things like incumbency, prior elective office, political demographics of a district and the flavor at the top of both tickets (in presidential years). The ones where advertising makes a difference and moves undecideds are fascinating things to watch. When Verne Hagstrom won by 27 votes, it is impossible to say the pictures of the holes in the water plant and the police cars up on blocks did not play into Candidate Hagstrom's "capital planning" campaign. When Cawthorn beat Clayton in the Special Senate Election, the determinant was not the skill of the ads, it was their timing. Each candidate was a relative stranger in the other side of the Senate district. Cawthorn strenuously introduced himself during the Christmas season while a lot of people were home watching TV. Nobody thought Cawthorn would intrude on people's Holidays, but he did. Clayton then put out some catch-up introductory ads but, by that time, Cawthorn had moved on to attacking Clayton. Ironically, a lot of people now think the formula for a winning ad over there is "a gun and a dog." That was never the point. The winning point was define your opponent in relation to yourself (in this case quite unfairly) early.
Blunt may win the Senate Seat in Missouri but I sure don't get the point of his TV campaign. "Vote for me because I'm not her..(meaning Pelosi, not Carnahan).
Gosh, just think: In a week it'll all be over and anyone looking for strategy will have to watch College Football.
posted by UMRBlog @ 15:54
0 comments
Friday, October 15, 2010
WITH SOME TREPIDATION: HERE GOES
Last Night there was a LWV candidates forum here in the Q. Who do you think did badly and who did poorly and why? Whether it's policy or presentation skills, The Basin would like to hear your views. A minimum of name-calling and profanity would be appreciated.
posted by UMRBlog @ 09:40
0 comments
Thursday, October 14, 2010
POLITICAL TV: REGISTER YOUR HITS AND MISSES
Today I'd like to hear your views on the political TV ads. Let's put how we feel about the individual candidates aside and just kind of critique the video product. I'll drop one in below so you see what the kind of thing I'd like to get from all viewpoints.
No, there is no door prize.
posted by UMRBlog @ 08:56
9 comments
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
BLOG-CATION
Recently Been Preoccupied with teaching a very large ten-month-old the niceties of the Bull Rush, Head Slap, Spin Move and how to sniff out a screen pass. Kid's gonna eat quarterbacks.
Was not making a statement or sitting out the election. Just enjoying my not-so-little Buddy.
posted by UMRBlog @ 02:50
0 comments
About Me
- Name: UMRBlog
- Location: Upper Mississippi River Basin, Tri-State, United States
Christian, Father, Husband, Brother, Uncle, Veteran, Threat Assessor, Both Illini and Hawkeye Grad, Democrat, "Sticker", Friend, Neighbor, Cub Fan, Bear Fan, Outside the box thinker, Multitasker, Golfer, Believer in Civility and Good Manners until some butt makes it impossible, Throws Right, Bats Left, Good Power, Good Arm, Good Glove, Bad Speed, Hold Doors and Chairs for women,
Links
- Cameron Law Offices (We do Government Hassles and Licenses) >PROGRESSIVE AND DEMOCRAT ORGANIZATION SITES:
- Award Winning Illinois Young Democrats
- Democratic Party of Illinois(news, links, bio)
- Adams County Young Democrats >LOCAL AREA BLOGS:
- Rocky Cola 2.0 (It's Twoooooo--He's Back)
- Quincy Fire (anti-everything, c&p)
- Provine Projectile (ranging commentary)
- Quincy City Desk
- Quincy Pundit (GOP, clever, mixed media)
- Annette Boardman (Diary, Not normal Kosfare)
- Xanga by ZSA, MD (not for the insensitive)
- Funions Follies
- Ursa Daily News (steady commentary)
https://rockycola2.blogspot.com/ > OTHER (CATEGORIES PENDING)- ArchPundit (deconstructs political facts and stats)
- Prairie State Blue (Basin favorite)
- Illinois Reason(Good but pack a lunch)
- BlogfreeSpringfield(original thought, issues u/m)
- Illinois DemNet (Solid Information on Progressive Activity)
- Democratic Underground (Full Featured dark, news&forum)
- CQPolitics.com Illinois News Headlines(Election news/analysis)
NEWS OUTLETS (Not necessarily Independent)- Quincy Magazine (great photography!)
- BBC (in English, I guess, but still foreigners)
- CapitolFaxBlog(loose calls and personal attacks, very downhill)
- Drudge (fast but proceed at your own risk)
- Roll Call (nice niche market)
- Google News
COLLEGE SPORTS FAVORITES' SITES:- Hogwired (Razorback Heaven)
- QU Hawks (PHP, but nice)
- Iowa Hawkeyes (over the top for wrestling)
- Illini (good content)
THIS SEASON'S ADOPTED BASKETBALL TEAM:- UT/San Antonio
- Edit-Me
Previous Posts
- GOOD TREASON, BAD TREASON AND "TBD" TREASON
- A CAMEL IS A HORSE THAT WAS BUILT BY A COMMITTEE
- BLESSING ICU OUTTA BEDS AND WE'RE ONLY AT 11%
- CENTRALIZED POWER VERSUS GOVERNING: WHY THE NEXT ...
- LET'S TRY THIS AGAIN: LETTER TO AUTHORITIES SUPPOR...
- A THOUGHT FOR OUR LEADERS
- "ESSENTIAL: I AIN'T NO FORTUNATE SON.!"
- BAILEY TRO, MARKED UP WITH COMMENTS
- THE BAILEY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
- GAVIN CASE: EGGSHELLS AND OMELETTES
Archives
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- May 2012
- July 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- April 2013
- May 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2014
- February 2015
- March 2015
- May 2015
- September 2015
- December 2015
- January 2016
- February 2016
- May 2016
- June 2016
- July 2016
- November 2016
- February 2017
- March 2017
- September 2019
- October 2019
- November 2019
- January 2020
- April 2020
- May 2020
- November 2020
- January 2021
- July 2023
- Current Posts
