The Giants gained ground this week on the Mannyless Dodgers, taking two of three in Chavez Ravine. Kicking things off is Barry Zito, who holds MLB’s EqA leaders to one run in six frames. Thanks to a 1.9 K/BB ratio — his best since 2004 — Zito has four quality starts in his last five, but he’s just 1-3 for his troubles thanks to 2.6 runs per game of support.
| CARVIEW |
Tools of Ignorance, a Giants Baseball Blog
performance analysis
May 15, 2009
Zito Is the New Cain
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, performance analysis, pitching, ZitoLeave a Comment
May 8, 2009
Where’s the Patience?
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, hitting, Molina, performance analysisLeave a Comment
Bengie Molina has bashed three homers in a three-game span, powering the Giants to a pair of wins. He’s got seven of the team’s NL-low 16 dingers, but through 104 plate appearances, still hasn’t drawn a walk, and yes, the Giants are last in that category as well as scoring. Sadly, Molina’s .308 OBP is just the fourth-lowest among the team’s eight regulars, and it’s two points above the team’s rate.
April 24, 2009
Lackluster Two Weeks In
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, hitting, performance analysis, pitchingLeave a Comment
Tim Lincecum whiffs 13 snakes in eight shutout innings, and while the bullpen blows that sterling performance, it does allay some concerns about the reigning NL Cy Young winner after two lackluster starts to open the season. Meanwhile, lackluster would be an improvement for the Giants’ offense, where Fred Lewis and Aaron Rowand are the only regulars with OBPs above .300 and SLGs above .340. Like their Bay Area neighbors, they’re last in their league in EqA.
April 12, 2009
NL Predictions
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, performance analysis, predictionsLeave a Comment
My predictions for this year’s National League standings aren’t likely to receive much brotherly love, since I see the defending world champions finishing with 87 wins, second to the Mets in the NL East, and a game short of the wild card. I think the Phillies’ offense will match last year’s (although Raul Ibanez is a definite downgrade and one of the worst of the off-season free-agent signings), but the pitching is poised for a major drop. Although the staff has seen upgrades; a full year of Joe Blanton and league-average pitching from fifth-starter candidates Chan Ho Park and J. A. Happ make for a stronger back end of the rotation. Their problems start with the improbability of Cole Hamels matching last year’s 3.09 ERA over a career-high 227 innings (plus another 35 in the postseason). I also see regression to the mean for bullpen studs Brad Lidge and Ryan Madson.
I expect the Mets to christen their new ballpark with a 92-win season and the division flag. While they could have done more to patch their rotation and their outfield corners, the bullpen makeover – starring Francisco Rodriguez and J. J. Putz – squarely addresses last year’s biggest flaw, and David Wright, Jose Reyes, and Carlos Beltran are three of the league’s ten most valuable hitters. Also in the hunt are the Braves, who not only feature three players who are the best or second-best at their positions (Chipper Jones, Brian McCann, and Kelly Johnson), but can boast adding the Derek Lowe-Javier Vazquez tandem to their rotation.
Over in the NL Central, the Cubs will have the league’s highest win total (95), as well as the largest margin (11 games) over the second-place team (the Brewers). The division could be a closer contest if Carlos Zambrano’s shoulder problems return, or if oft-injured Milton Bradley and Rich Harden can’s approach their playing time projections. The Brew Crew’s winter blueprint consisted of trying to replace the departed CC Sabathia and Ben Sheets with Braden Looper (good luck with that), and still figure to be respectable (84 wins), but not much more than that, particularly with ace-in-waiting Yovani Gallardo capped at 150 innings due to workload concerns. They’ll scuffle with the 83-win Cardinals, whose hopes of soaring higher hinge upon Chris Carpenter, and the 79-win Reds, whose fate could improve if the much-touted maturation of Homer Bailey (80 innings last year with a dreadful 5.62 ERA) is for real. The Cards are dragged down by a truly awful defense; the Reds are limited by Dusty Baker’s insistence upon not only playing Willy Tavares regularly, but sticking him in the leadoff spot.
The Central forecasts as the league’s weakest division according to overall winning percentage (.488) because of the two doormats, the Astros and Pirates. The 64-win Bucs are a lock for their 17th consecutive losing season, while the 69-win Astros are poised for a 17-win drop-off from last year. The latter finished nine games above their Pythagorean record last year, so they’re an easy bet to regress, and the combination of an inflexible payroll hamstrung by a few big contracts, the worst farm system in the game, and a rotation relying upon Brian Moehler and the undead Mike Hampton and Russ Ortiz add up to one more chance to invoke the time-honored phrase, “Houston, we have a problem.”
The Dodgers took home last year’s Mild Mild West flag with a paltry 84 wins, but their current forecast calls for a robust 92 victories thanks to the maturation of their homegrown talent. Led by young studs Chad Billingsley, Clayton Kershaw and Jonathan Broxton, their staff should be the league’s best. On the flip side, their offense projects to finish fifth in scoring, thanks largely to Manny Ramirez and a team OBP that should rank at or near the top of the league.
As for the Diamondbacks, their 88-win forecast makes them the favorite for the wild card. Despite a winter which saw them shed several key free agents (Orlando Hudson, Randy Johnson, Adam Dunn, Juan Cruz) and skimp on their replacements due to economic concerns, they forecast to be solid in both scoring (sixth) and pitching (fifth), thanks to an enviable young nucleus of their own in Chris Young, Stephen Drew, Conor Jackson and Justin Upton, not to mention Brandon Webb and Dan Haren, who I think will be two of baseball’s four most valuable pitchers.
At the end of the day, my projections are not destiny. There are thousands of probabilities for all the players involved. Which teams will break out beyond my projections, or underachieve relative to them, is part of the fun of watching the season unfold.
NL W-L RS RA
Cubs 95-67 861 726
Mets 92-70 825 721
Dodgers 92-70 819 714
D’backs 88-74 815 741
Phillies 87-75 828 769
Braves 86-76 799 742
Brewers 84-78 785 754
Cardinals 83-79 787 767
Reds 79-83 762 775
Nationals 77-85 780 819
Giants 76-86 683 717
Padres 72-90 679 753
Marlins 71-91 727 824
Rockies 71-91 842 951
Astros 69-93 704 811
Pirates 64-98 709 875
April 8, 2009
AL Predictions
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, performance analysis, predictionsLeave a Comment
My friend Ombudsben runs a pool every season in which we pick the league-wide order-of-finish for all the teams in the majors. Bettors are assigned points for how far off they are on each team. For example, if I pick the Yankees to finish at the top of the AL and they finish third, I get two points (3-1=2). The participant with fewest points wins the pool. I won the pool two years ago, but not last season (despite picking the Rays to finish with the fifth-best record in the AL). I thought this year, I’d share my picks, all of which were made on April 5.
Let’s make something clear: There is method to my madness. I go about this by predicting runs scored and allowed for each team, and the records are simply a function of that. I make some minor adjustments to correct for rounding errors and the possible impact of a particularly strong or weak bullpen, but for the most part, I’m concerned with runs. We simply don’t have much evidence that outside the effect of a bullpen, teams can distribute their runs in a way that gives them a leg up on the Pythagorean formula. So my predictions, and my evaluations of them, focus on runs. Nailing a team’s record, but being off by 70 runs of differential is a bug, not a feature.
We’ll start with the American League, where, in the East, once again we have the three best teams fighting for the two playoff spots that go with the division title and the wild card. In the AL Central, all five teams have reasonable hope. In the AL West, three teams have a decent chance to make the post-season. When at least 11 of 14 teams have statistically reasonable chances of making the playoffs, you can’t call it parity because of those beasts in the East, but you can call it entertaining.
I expect us to see a milder West in 2009. Although the Angels won 100 games last season, that was in no small part because of them outperforming their expected finish by 13 games. Operate from that starting point, delete Mark Teixeira, and anticipate a good amount of lost ground from the pitching staff – especially Joe Saunders, but also from a bullpen that helped the Angels finish an MLB-best 31-21 in one-run games – and you’ve got a .500 ball club. I think that lets the Athletics nose slightly ahead with a much-improved offense, but questions about their rotation and health will make for two teams with bids fragile enough that the Mariners could sneak into the picture.
The Central’s fun because it’s tight. From the Indians’ projected 86 wins to the Royals’ last-place tally of 75, there is no division quite so competitive top to bottom. The Indians’ bid would be a lot more secure if they could guarantee big bouncebacks from Victor Martinez and Travis Hafner, not to mention a completely ready Matt LaPorta, to give their lineup some big bats behind Grady Sizemore. Run prevention is a source of concern. Does anyone know what comes next for Cliff Lee, let alone Fausto Carmona? Will Kerry Wood provide stability for the bullpen? The Indians look like a mediocre contender on my list below, but there’s enough upside play to make the Tribe the one team in the Central with a solid shot at 90 wins.
For the rest, the Tigers’ decision to copy the Rays and go for an infield makeover keeps them closest to the Tribe, but here again, questions over which starters they can count on make them an unpredictable commodity. It’s for that reason that the White Sox and Twins can make sustained plays for the title – both teams have quality at the front end of their rotations that could propel either back to the postseason. If the White Sox get good work from Jose Contreras and/or Bartolo Colon to give their power-driven lineup enough winnable ballgames, the Sox might have the laugh on me. If the Twins can find a way to shore up one of the league’s weaker offenses, they’re also in the hunt, although losing Joe Mauer early reflects how little the franchise has to go on once you get past a few key hitters. The Royals become least-likely because they have problems on both sides of the ball. Getting more offense from slow-developing sluggers like Alex Gordon and Billy Butler could compensate for the shortcomings of Jose Guillen and Mike Jacobs as middle-of-the-order power sources.
Which brings us to the East, where three teams enter, but only two teams leave. Which one gets left behind? The cream of the league is so tightly grouped that it’s easy to envision play-in games after the regular season, and all three teams can already be second-guessed. Going without an A-Rod replacement during his injury-induced absence? Sending down David Price? Missing Manny? Where the Rays have a young team built to last and the Red Sox have a core of talent that should be shored up in-season with reinforcements, the Yankees have to hope this year’s bought-and-paid-for team gels fast. With this winter’s gig-ticket free agents added to aging pillars Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada and Andy Pettitte, can they make my expectation that theirs is the game’s best pitching staff stand up? If A. J. Burnett comes up short or Joba Chamberlain breaks down, you can kiss that league-best record good-bye, see another Bomber-free October, and watch for the long knives in the Bronx.
Even the teams you have to feel for have reasons to feel good. While the Blue Jays and Orioles are doomed to the bottom of baseball’s best division, both feature worthwhile prospects worth following – starting off with Matt Wieters in Baltimore and Travis Snider in Toronto – with more to come at the end of the season. The Orioles and Rangers can’t really anticipate changing fortunes until two of the best collections of young pitching anywhere in baseball begin to come up towards the end of the season, while the Jays have to hope another season squandered on long-term deals with offensive mediocrities doesn’t whittle down what interest remains in any pitching staff that can boast Doc Halladay’s latest bid for a Cy Young award.
AL W-L RS RA
Yankees 99-63 801 634
Red Sox 95-67 846 715
Rays 94-68 814 690
Indians 86-76 818 774
Athletics 84-78 781 755
Angels 81-81 777 777
Tigers 80-82 789 802
Mariners 77-85 719 753
Blue Jays 76-86 713 755
White Sox 76-86 779 828
Twins 76-86 746 792
Royals 75-87 737 792
Orioles 75-87 822 891
Rangers 70-92 795 909
March 1, 2009
Comparing First Basemen
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, Ishikawa, performance analysis, predictions1 Comment
For our second installment of “Fun With Comparables,” we’re going to look at the Travis Ishikawa, who will get the chance this year to build on his 2008 minor-league breakout season. Ishikawa’s first comp is Garrett Jones, currently 28, whose only major-league experience was with the 2006 Twins. In 84 plate appearances, he hit .208/.262/.338. Guys who can’t field have to be monsters with the bat, and Jones isn’t. Ishikawa, on the other hand, is a excellent defensive first baseman who will take the occasional walk. Jones mastered neither skill. Now a Pirate, Jones is waiting for something bad to happen to Adam LaRoche.
Ishikawa’s second comp, is listed as “Mike Hocutt.” I’ve searched high and low and cannot find a thing about any such player at any level of organized ball. Oh, well. Let’s move along.
Over parts of four seasons, and 149 plate appearances, Jim Adduci, Ishikawa’s third comp, hit .236/.242/.326, and was out of baseball at age 29. On April 19, 1987, Adduci was actually purchased by the San Francisco Giants from the Milwaukee Brewers, only to be sent back in one week. (Having a young Will Clark at first allows that.) On June 4, the Brewers released Adduci, and he finished the season playing for the Taiyo Whales in Japan.
Ishikawa’s fourth comp is former Athletic Dan Johnson. Johnson can do two things Oakland loves — hit for power and take some walks — but he doesn’t do enough of either to overcome his deficiencies. His poor 2007 led to the Daric Barton era in Oakland. The Rays picked Johnson up off waivers last year, and assigned him to Durham, where he was player of the year. The Rays didn’t have much use for his skills til late-season roster expansion. Then, on September 9, in his first big-league at-bat with his new team, he took Jonathan Papelbon deep to help pull out a win in the ninth inning of the biggest win in franchise history at the time. At the close of the season, Johnson went for the payday, signing a seven-figure deal to play in Japan in 2009.
While Ishikawa has promise, his minor-league career is a bit checkered, and he is already 25, so pinning too much hope on his bat might lead to disappointment. He plays Gold-Glove calibre first base, though, and that might count for a lot with Pablo Sandoval’s stylings at third. If Ishikawa, like two of his comps, ends up playing some in Japan, he might naturally prove popular there.
February 28, 2009
Fun With Comparables
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, Molina, performance analysis, predictionsLeave a Comment
My favorite baseball annual, Baseball Prospectus, lists statistics for the players it profiles, and uses its proprietary PECOTA system to project a player’s likely statistics for the upcoming season. PECOTA projects player performance based on comparisons with thousands of historical player-seasons. The annual also lists for each player his four highest scoring comparable players, as determined by PECOTA. These are the four most similar comparables, and not the entire sample from which PECOTA generates its projection.
The comparables are only supposed to suggest what a player might do in a particular year; if the top comparables for young outfielder Johnny Wetcougar, 22, are Dave Winfield and Ed Delahanty, the most you can infer is that the system likes him and thinks he’s going to be a good hitter in the style of those players at a similar point in their career. The comparables do not suggest either that Wetcougar will deliver 3000 hits like Winfield or get drunk and fall off of an open drawbridge like Delahanty. The PECOTA comps are not destiny, but they do represent a snapshot of how the listed player was performing at the same age as the current player. Thus, if a 23-year-old hitter is compared to Sammy Sosa, he’s actually being compared to a 23-year-old Sammy Sosa, not to Sosa at the age of 31, when he was one of the best hitters on the planet, or Sosa at 38, when he was an adequate DH who could stand to be platooned.
Having made that statement, I am not forced to admit that I like to take them as destiny, or at least a hint thereof. Between now and Opening Day, I’ll be taking a look at the comparables for each of the players likely to get major playing time for the Giants this season, with the hopes of discerning what sorts of performances we might expect from them. We start today with catcher Bengie Molina.
Molina’s top four comparables are Brian Harper, Darrin Fletcher, Bill Freehan, and Jeff Conine. Harper’s age-34 season was his second-to-last, and marked a steep decline for him. He actually caught in only 25 games for the 1994 Brewers, a significant decrease from the 130-odd he’s caught in each of the previous two years. He had fewer than half the plate appearances he’d had in either of the two previous seasons, most of those at DH. His rate stats (.291/.318./398) may have explained why Phil Garner used him so much less, but it also had something to do with the rise of 24-year-old Dave Nilsson. For the first time in six years, Harper’s EQA was less than the league average. The next season, he had seven plate appearances with the Athletics, and retired.
Darrin Fletcher at 34 had 453 plate appearances for the 2001 Blue Jays, which was way too many considering his rate stats fell off a cliff from previous seasons. .226/.274/.353 (a .218 EQA) is unacceptable, certainly from a catcher not known for his defense. But with Kevin Cash the best catcher in their farm system, the Jays were a bit stymied for a solution. So desparate were the Jays for a catcher that for 2002, they signed minor-league journeyman free agent Ken Huckaby, whose claim to fame at the time was one major-league at-bat, albeit for the 2001 world champion Arizona Diamondbacks. Fletcher’s EQA fell to .202 in 2002, and he retired.
Bill Freehan was one of the great catchers in the 1960s. A five-time Gold Glove winner, he held the career record for fielding percentage until 2002, and was runner-up for the AL MVP award in 1968, when his Detroit Tigers won the World Series. At 34, though, Freehan was in his last season, catching in 61 games, the same number as Bruce Kimm, and only two more than John Wockenfuss. He retired at the end of the season.
At 34, Jeff Conine still had six more years of above-league-average hitting ahead of him, and would play until he was 41. The fact that PECOTA sees Conine as a comparable for Molina is encouraging, but the fact Conine was not a catcher makes this comp perhaps less reliable.
It might be argued that Molina’s career highs in RBI (and double plays hit into!) last season was the result of career highs in games and plate appearances, something of a red flag for a catcher who will turn 35 in July. Fortunately, Molina is in the last year of his contract, and Buster Posey should be ready to take over behind the plate in 2010.
February 15, 2009
Numbers Don’t Let Us Reach Pat Conclusions About Steroids
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, park effects, PEDs, performance analysisLeave a Comment
A friend of mine was lamenting Alex Rodriguez’s use of steroids, pointing out that three of A-Rod’s five highest single-season home run totals occured during the three seasons he admits to using illegal substances while a Texas Ranger, and, more damningly, that his time as a Ranger showed a marked jump in homers from the previous period in his career. But this sort of analysis omits any context for Rodriguez’s accomplishments, the most important of which just might be the home field, at which he played half his games.
Comparing Rodriguez’s last three years in Seattle (1998 to 2000), during which most of his home games were at Safeco Field, the most difficult ballpark in the American League in which to hit home runs, with his three years in Texas (2001 to 2003), which was the easiest park in the league for the long ball, is instructive. During those years in Seattle, Rodriguez averaged 17 home runs at home and 25 on the road; in his Texas years, he averaged 29 at home and 23 on the road. The entire difference can be explained away by where he played. (His five-year averages with the Yankees are 22 homers at Yankee Stadium, a more neutral ballpark, and 20 on the road.) Another conclusion can be drawn: that Rodriguez began using performance-enhancing substances far earlier than he acknowledged or continued using them after he said he had stopped.
But his statistics in Texas cannot support the case that whatever substances he used during those years affected his homerun output.
September 23, 2008
Overachievers, Yes; “Excellent,” No
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, hitting, Los Angeles Angels, managers & managing, performance analysis, pitching, press criticism1 Comment
Bruce Jenkins was at it again in the Chron today, writing about Billy Beane’s guts and “desperation” as he works to build a team to compete against the Los Angeles Angels, “baseball’s model of excellence, surpassing the Red Sox and leaving the Yankees in a little pile of dust.” I don’t know what criteria Jenkins uses to judge excellence, but he certainly doesn’t look at the numbers.
With a .622 winning percentage through Monday, the Angels are on a pace for 100 wins, the traditional mark for excellence in teams. They lead the American League West by 22 games with six games to go.
But the Angels, despite having baseball’s best record, aren’t nearly as good a team as they appear to be, because as strong as the Angels’ record is, it reflects too generously on a team that has had a great deal of luck. (more…)
May 6, 2008
Giants Have Had It Harder Than Most
Posted by gumbo8566 under baseball, performance analysis, scheduleLeave a Comment
Given the relative success so far this season of teams like the Marlins and Cardinals, whom I had not expected to do well, I was curious as to whether strength or weakness of schedule had helped or hurt teams so far this season. Using Baseball Prospectus’s adjusted standings page, and specifically BP’s stats for Equivalent Runs, Equivalent Runs Allowed, and the adjusted sets of those numbers (see the notes on the BP page and their glossary for the math), we can indeed determine which teams in baseball have had the toughest and easiest schedules through games of yesterday, May 5:
Toughest Easiest
Rockies Cardinals
Nationals Cubs
Pirates Phillies
Giants Marlins
Reds Braves
We can immediately see from this that the AL has a lot more parity right now, with five NL teams having tougher schedules than any AL team (toughest schedule so far in the AL is Tampa Bay), and six NL teams having an easier schedule than the AL’s easiest (the Angels). Given what we know about the teams other than their records and schedules, it’s fair to say the Marlins are a sandcastle, and the Cards’ position is not sustainable. The Giants have had a tough stretch of their schedule, and perhaps that is reason to hope that their winning percentage, better than I for one expected it to be at this point, can actually be sustained. (Of course, it would still mean 90 losses.)
Remember, it’s only been 30-odd games, and so small-sample-size caveats apply.
Categories
- "integrity of the game"
- baseball
- Bonds
- bullpen
- economics
- farm
- Frandsen
- free agents
- gambling
- Hall of Fame
- hitting
- injury
- interleague play
- Ishikawa
- Kent
- lineup
- Los Angeles Angels
- managers & managing
- minor leagues
- Molina
- NL West
- Pacific Coast League
- park effects
- PEDs
- performance analysis
- pitching
- predictions
- press criticism
- prospects
- Roberts
- roster management
- Sabean
- SABR
- San Diego Padres
- San Francisco Seals
- schedule
- scoring
- spring training
- transactions
- Uncategorized
- Zito
Archives
- Closers Relief Pitchers Sabean Wilson
-
"integrity of the game" baseball Bonds bullpen economics farm gambling hitting injury interleague play Kent lineup Los Angeles Angels managers & managing Molina PEDs performance analysis pitching predictions press criticism prospects roster management Sabean SABR San Diego Padres schedule scoring spring training transactions Uncategorized
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.