| CARVIEW |
Pages
Categories
- Abbreviations (67)
- Attributions (4)
- Capitalizing (1,370)
- Change of Person (11)
- Cliches (87)
- Confused Words (1,528)
- accept/except (3)
- ad/add (10)
- addition/edition (2)
- adieu/ado (4)
- adverse/averse (2)
- advice/advise (4)
- affect/effect (47)
- aid/aide (6)
- aisle/isle (1)
- allude/elude (1)
- already/all ready (2)
- alter/altar (10)
- altogether/all together (24)
- anecdote/antidote (2)
- ante/anti (1)
- appraise/apprise (1)
- away/aweigh (3)
- awhile/a while (12)
- baited/bated (5)
- bare/bear (34)
- bazaar/bizarre (1)
- berg/burg (1)
- bite/byte (5)
- boarder/border (1)
- born/borne (3)
- bouillon/bullion (1)
- brake/break (9)
- breach/breech (2)
- bread/bred (1)
- breath/breathe (11)
- buy/by (11)
- cache/cachet (11)
- caddy/catty (1)
- canon/cannon (7)
- canvas/canvass (2)
- capital/capitol (21)
- carat/karat (5)
- cease/seize (1)
- censor/sensor (2)
- chord/cord (8)
- cite/sight/site (20)
- close/clothes (1)
- coarse/course (1)
- complement/compliment (24)
- complementary/complimentary (5)
- confidant/confidante (6)
- continuous/continual (7)
- councilor/counselor (3)
- creak/creek (1)
- cue/queue (4)
- dam/damn (3)
- decent/descent (10)
- defuse/diffuse (4)
- delegate/relegate (2)
- desert/dessert (14)
- die/dye (8)
- discrete/discreet (13)
- divorcé/divorcée (7)
- do/due (8)
- dual/duel (3)
- e.g./i.e. (6)
- eek/eke (8)
- elicit/illicit (4)
- everyday/every day (39)
- everyone/every one (3)
- evoke/invoke (3)
- fair/fare (5)
- farther/further (13)
- faze/phase (12)
- feat/feet/fete (3)
- fiancé/fiancée (22)
- flair/flare (4)
- flour/flower (3)
- flu/flue (1)
- forego/forgo (4)
- foreword/forward (2)
- formally/formerly (2)
- forth/fourth (2)
- foul/fowl (1)
- gild/guild (2)
- gilt/guilt (2)
- golf/gulf (1)
- grisly/grizzly (3)
- hail/hale (1)
- hangar/hanger (12)
- hawk/hock (2)
- heal/heel (5)
- hear/here (6)
- heroin/heroine (4)
- hole/whole (2)
- horde/hoard (28)
- its/it's (176)
- jibe/jive (1)
- knew/new (7)
- knot/not (2)
- know/no (4)
- ladder/latter (1)
- lay/lei (1)
- led/lead (10)
- lessen/lesson (1)
- lets/let's (23)
- lightening/lightning (16)
- lo/low (3)
- loath/loathe (5)
- lore/lure (1)
- lose/loose (19)
- mail/male (2)
- mantel/mantle (2)
- maybe/may be (4)
- meat/meet (1)
- medal/metal (1)
- meringue/merengue (3)
- moat/mote (1)
- mores/morays (1)
- morning/mourning (1)
- naught/not (1)
- naval/navel (1)
- one/won (2)
- or/ore (1)
- overseas/oversees (4)
- pail/pale (2)
- pains/pangs (2)
- pair/pare/pear (6)
- palate/palette/pallet (25)
- passed/past (7)
- peace/piece (8)
- peal/peel (1)
- pedal/peddle/petal (6)
- peek/peak/pique (64)
- penchant/pension (1)
- personal/personnel (1)
- perspective/prospective (1)
- plain/plane (1)
- plum/plumb (2)
- pole/poll (2)
- poor/pore/pour (5)
- pray/prey (2)
- premier/premiere (14)
- prescribe/proscribe (3)
- principal/principle (28)
- rack/wrack (2)
- rap/wrap (5)
- red/read (1)
- reek/wreak (1)
- regimen/regiment (5)
- reign/rein (33)
- right/rite (8)
- ringer/wringer (6)
- roll/role (18)
- rough/ruff (1)
- rout/route (1)
- rung/wrung (1)
- sac/sack (1)
- scull/skull (1)
- seam/seem (2)
- secede/succeed (1)
- secession/succession (1)
- seen/scene (1)
- sew/sow (3)
- shears/sheers (1)
- shoe/shoo (14)
- shone/shown (1)
- sight/site (4)
- sleight/slight (2)
- sole/soul (2)
- staff/staph (1)
- staid/stayed (1)
- stationary/stationery (15)
- steal/steel (3)
- straight/strait (3)
- tack/tact (3)
- tail/tale (6)
- taut/taught (3)
- tenant/tenet (5)
- than/then (44)
- that/which (13)
- their/there/they're (43)
- threw/through (3)
- throes/throws (1)
- throne/thrown (2)
- tic/tick (3)
- to/too/two (65)
- toe/tow (8)
- track/tract (2)
- troop/troupe (1)
- vain/vein (4)
- vial/vile (1)
- vice/vise (1)
- waddle/wattle (2)
- waist/waste (6)
- wait/weight (1)
- waive/wave (3)
- ware/wear/where (9)
- wary/weary (1)
- way/weigh (2)
- weak/week (1)
- weather/whether (2)
- wet/whet (2)
- whit/wit (1)
- whose/who's (42)
- wreak/wreck (7)
- yoke/yolk (2)
- your/you're (85)
- Conjunctions (29)
- Contractions (144)
- Correlative Conjunctions (87)
- both…and (14)
- either…or (19)
- neither…nor (40)
- not only…but also (15)
- Department of Redundancy Dept. (349)
- Errors of Fact (1,341)
- Grammar Myths (8)
- Jargon (1)
- Links (22)
- Metaphors (7)
- Missing Words (821)
- Misspellings (4,730)
- Modifiers (284)
- Adjectives (162)
- Adverbs (68)
- Misplaced Modifiers (50)
- Numbers (57)
- Plurals (346)
- Possessives (502)
- Pronouns (363)
- Punctuation (2,190)
- Apostrophes (849)
- Colons (23)
- Commas (278)
- Dashes (17)
- Exclamation Points (11)
- Hyphens (991)
- Parentheses (35)
- Periods (93)
- Question Marks (174)
- Quotation Marks (314)
- Semicolons (44)
- Subject-Verb Agreement (706)
- Titles (105)
- Uncategorized (622)
- Unnecessary Words (874)
- Verbs (917)
- Words (2)
- Wrong words (3,093)
- apostrophe bad grammar bad spelling capitalization comma Commonly confused words consistency editing extra word factual error factual errors factual mistake factual mistakes funny typo funny typos funny writing errors funny writing mistakes grammar grammar errors grammar mistakes homophone homophones hyphen inconsistency incorrect grammar incorrect punctuation incorrect spelling it's journalism Lauren Tuck misplaced punctuation missing apostrophe missing hyphen missing punctuation missing word misspelled celebrities misspelling omg! plural possessive pronoun proofreading Punctuation punctuation errors punctuation mistakes question mark quotation mark redundancy repeated word Shine spelling spelling error spelling mistake Subject-Verb Agreement The Ticket The Upshot typo typos unnecessary punctuation unnecessary word verb writing wrong word Yahoo! Yahoo! Celebrity Yahoo! front page Yahoo! Makers Yahoo! Movies Yahoo! Music Yahoo! News Yahoo! omg! Yahoo! Shine Yahoo! Sports Yahoo! Style Yahoo! TV
January 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
After reading this
April 14, 2017 — LauraAfter reading this, I realized that the Yahoo! Style writer doesn’t know what a dangling participle is:
According to that sentence, paramedics revived the child — which would be a little challenging since they allegedly performed that miracle after arriving at her location.
The dangling participial phrase “after reviving the child” requires a subject, which the reader expects to find immediately after the phrase. Thus, the writer (and her accomplice, the editor) told us it was paramedics. The correct wording would be something like: After the officer revived the child.
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
The only publicly misused punctuation
October 9, 2016 — LauraOK, so I lied. There is no single punctuation character that is publicly misused. Every punctuation character is misused in public, especially on Yahoo!. This time the punctuation is a hyphen and the site is Yahoo! Finance:
The rule: Don’t put a hyphen between an adverb ending in -LY and the word it modifies.
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Who stitched this together?
June 25, 2016 — LauraWhoever stitched together this sentence for Yahoo! Sports did a pretty good job, if you ignore the misspelling and the missing hyphen in the compound adjective gruesome-looking:
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Uniquely unprepared to edit
May 16, 2016 — LauraThe editors at the Yahoo! front page seem uniquely unqualified to perform their jobs. They just can’t remember that there’s no hyphen between an adverb ending in -LY (like, oh, say, maybe uniquely) and the word that follows it:
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Carefully editing planning was necessary
April 11, 2016 — LauraHere’s what the folks at Yahoo! Style could use: Some carefully planned editing. Or at least careful proofreading so that an adjective, and not an adverb, is used to modify a noun:
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Nice try, but wrong
April 5, 2016 — LauraI gotta give the Yahoo! Celebrity writer credit for trying to use hyphens in a compound modifier. But not too much credit, because he got it wrong:
He tried to combine “five-second to eight-second technical issue,” which is admirable. But the result isn’t quite right. The correct use of hyphens is: five- to eight-second technical issue.
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Dis-graceful
January 29, 2016 — LauraIf this were written by a third-grader, the mistakes might be understandable. But coming from a professional writer for Yahoo! Style, they’re downright disgraceful:
Someone writing about fashion should know that paillettes needs two L’s; they are a type of sequin. And when the plural word is the subject of the sentence, it requires a plural subject. And Lord help her (because no one at Yahoo! will), the writer actually thinks that graceful is a suitable modifier for the verb floats. It is not; the adverb gracefully is.
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Make your own candle holder holder
October 28, 2015 — LauraEven if the writer for Yahoo! Makers managed to spell Smoky Mountain correctly, this brief excerpt would be problematic:
Why did she use the adverb cheaply? It apparently modifies available, but have you ever heard of anything that was “cheaply available,” and not merely cheap?
But the worst mistake is the terminology she used to describe this DIY project. She calls the objects “candlestick holders,” but candlesticks are candle holders. So, you’d be making holders for candle holders. She’s obviously confused a candle with a candlestick.
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
What were the outfits wearing?
October 23, 2015 — LauraI have a question for the writer for Yahoo! Celebrity: What does a scantily clad outfit wear?
And I have another question: Why is there a hyphen between the adverb scantily and the word it modifies (clad)? And one more question: Was Ms. Jenner scantily clad or were her outfits?
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Did it immediately kick in?
October 17, 2015 — LauraDid your inner Grammar Cop immediately kick in when you read this from the Yahoo! front page?
Rate this:
Share this:
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Contact Terribly Write
Send your tips and comments to terriblywrite[at]yahoo.comTerribly Funny 2008
Terribly Funny 2009
Terribly Funny 2010
Archives
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Terribly Write 