AI is a Crock, by Robert Gore

AI answers questions, but it doesn’t ask them.

Never has humanity expended so much on an endeavor for which it will receive so little as the Artificial Intelligence (AI) project. Its design rests on the assumption that the human intelligence (HI) it is attempting to mimic and surpass is analogous to its own operating protocols. In other words, humans take in data and process it in definable ways that lead to understandable outputs, and that is the essence of HI.

AI designers reverse the scientific process of exploring reality and then defining, modeling, and perhaps deriving something useful from it, instead assuming that the reality of HI conforms to the AI model they’re building. It’s like expecting a clock to reveal the nature of time. This may seem surprising because among AI designers are some of the brightest people in the world. However, they demonstrate a profound lack of those qualities that might lead them to further understanding of HI: self-awareness, introspection, humility, wisdom, and appreciation of the fact that much of HI remains quite mysterious and may always remain so. Alas, some of them are just plain evil.

AI looks backward. It’s fed and assimilates vast amounts of existing data and slices and dices it in myriad ways. Large language models (LLMs) can respond to human queries and produce answers based on assimilated and manipulated data. AI can be incorporated into processes and systems in which procedures and outcomes are dependent on data and logically defined protocols for evaluating it. Within those parameters, it has demonstrated abilities to solve problems (playing complex games, medical diagnosis, professional qualification exams, improving existing processes) that surpass HI. There is, of course, value in such uses of LLMs and AI, but that value derives from making some of the more mundane aspects of HI—data assimilation, manipulation, and optimization for use—better. Does that value justify the trillions of dollars and megawatts being devoted to AI? Undoubtedly not.

THE GRAY RADIANCE DESCRIPTION, CHAPTER ONE

THE GRAY RADIANCE AMAZON LINK

What AI can’t and won’t touch are the most interesting, important, and forward-facing aspects of HI, because no one has yet figured out how those aspects actually work. They are captured by the question: How does the human mind and soul generate the new? How does curiosity, theorization, imagination, creativity, inspiration, experimentation, improvisation, development, revision, and persistence come together to produce innovation? It’s ludicrous to suggest that we have even a rudimentary understanding of where the new comes from. Ask innovators and creators how they generated a new idea and you’re liable to get answers such as: an inspiration awakened them at three in the morning, or it came to them while they were sitting on the toilet. Model that!

Continue reading

No Posting, 1/15-probably 2/8, for Ella Mae

My mother, Ella Mae Warner, passed away 12/22. Her funeral is 2/5. I am doing the eulogy. I have been handed a gift from God. My mom led an incredible life, and one of the things she did was take a memoir class. Her collected stories are around 500-700 pages. I had read some of them. Now I am reading each one, word by word . . . and rereading many of them. I know a great story when I see one. This one is beyond that, and well-written to boot. There’s no way I can do this justice if I don’t take this time. My mom is actually writing the eulogy, because much of it will be from her memoirs. I’ll do the best I can to keep up. I’ll post her eulogy when I get back. The service may be videotaped; my sister is making that decision. Here is the announcement I sent out:

My mom, Ella Mae Warner, passed away on December 22, 2025. She was born July 17, 1937 in Silverton, Colorado, the daughter of Enos and Edna May Michael. She had two brothers, Fred and Dickie, who have both passed away. She married my father, Ray Gore, in 1956. I was born in 1958 (after which, we moved to Los Alamos), my sister Judi in 1960, and my brother Jim in 1962.

Mom was a full-time mother for many years. She started a successful business in our home teaching the women of Los Alamos sewing techniques (she was an excellent seamstress). Later, she worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory and at several LANL contractors.

Mom and dad divorced in 1983. In 1995, mom married Charley Warner. They lived in Rio Rancho, New Mexico. Charley died in 2007. On Thanksgiving, 2023, mom fell and broke her hip. She was unable to regain mobility and moved into a nursing home. She died peacefully at the nursing home.

A memorial service will be held Thursday, February 5, 10 a.m. at Rio Rancho United Methodist Church, 1652 Abrazo Rd NE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124. In lieu of flowers, please donate to Watermelon Ranch in Rio Rancho (www.wmranch.org) in memory of Ella Mae Warner. That is the no-kill animal shelter where mom got Yoda, her beloved dog. My brother and his wife, Cyndie, have been caring for Yoda and brought her to the nursing home to visit mom almost every weekend.

Everyone who knew my mother knows how much we are going to miss her. We hope you will be able to attend the service.

Robert

The glow

h/t The Burning Platform

Clickbait Diplomacy, by T.L. Davis

T.L. Davis has a refreshing habit one finds occasionally in the alternative media but not often enough. When confronted with facts that admit of alternative interpretations, or when facts are ambiguous, he says so and argues accordingly. I’ve known him personally for a long time. He has strong views, many of which I agree with, some of which I don’t, but the basic intellectual integrity always comes through. I repost most of his articles, and he’s cited a couple of mine. From Davis at tldavis.com:

Sometimes it isn’t what is being said that’s important, but the volume of the message that tells the truth. From out of almost nowhere, the X message from liberals is that somehow the actions of ICE are totalitarian and dystopian, but when the FBI came after grandmothers praying in front of the capitol on January 6th, that wasn’t. They still call January 6th an insurrection, knowing that it wasn’t. This is all media hype that the left and bots have been able to manufacture for a long time and it works, if the point is to destabilize the nation, pit one group against another.

One cannot take these “people” (some of them are not) seriously, not because they have a different opinion, but because their opinions are guided by politics, not principle. I don’t like what ICE is doing in Minneapolis at every step, but they’re doing their jobs and when you have animated, brainwashed useful idiots all over the streets every day, there’s liable to be conflict and errors made. None of the left is calling for a pause in demonstrations to keep people safe, they are increasing the pressure to create mistakes. When people will not show proof of citizenship, knowing that ICE is there to determine and arrest illegals, that’s interference. There’s a thin line and it’s determined by the circumstances, this volatile situation is one of those circumstances when it changes.

Saying that, I am not likely to provide proof of citizenship on demand, or provide ID on a whim, but then, I’m not in Minneapolis during a surge of ICE agents with the intent of ridding the United States of illegals who have been defrauding the US Government and particularly taking my tax dollars and sending them to Somalia. I am more willing to cooperate there, where I will be aiding them by establishing my identity. That does not extend to being randomly pulled over on the street, however.

Continue reading

Iran Does Not Hate Americans… But it Has Legitimate Reasons to Do So, by Larry C. Johnson

You mean, there might be another side to the story? From Larry C. Johnson at sonar21.com:

During a Zoom meeting today I listened to a retired US General make the case for going to war against Iran… He was not advocating that Trump do so, but he provided a fascinating summary of how he, and most Americans, view Iran as a threat that must be destroyed. His basic charge is that Iran has killed thousands of Americans, especially US military personnel, and is an irredeemable terrorist state. Stay tuned… I’m going to show you how wrong that gentleman is.

When he finished talking, I asked for the floor and stated that Iran’s attacks on US personnel over the last 45 years were largely in response to US actions. What follows is a full explanation of my disagreement with his premise. I gave him the Reader’s Digest version… Here is the Full Monty.

Iran’s anger with the US begins in 1953, when the democratically elected President, Mohammad Mossadegh, was ousted from office in a CIA- and MI6-backed coup on 19 August 1953. The event is commonly referred to in Iran as the “28 Mordad” coup, after the corresponding date in the Iranian calendar.

Continue reading

The Fascist’s Guide to Business Success, by Paul Rosenberg

How to be a successful businessman, but not a success. From Paul Rosenberg at freemansperspective.com:

I was downtown last Thursday and ended up with an hour to kill before my train home, so I went down the station’s back stairs and around the corner to Jay’s Bar. It was almost six o’clock, so the crowd was a mix of corporate suits buying expensive vodka, tradesmen enjoying decent beer, and jobless neighborhood guys drinking cheap beer. I ordered something inoffensive and watched to see if any of my old Cypherpunk pals would show up.

But instead, my oldest nemesis showed up, whom I’ll call Jerry. I went to school with Jerry and whatever I did, he was always desperate to do better. The crazy thing was that we were almost the same guy: We played the same positions in sports; we were both crossing guards; and we were equally skilled at almost everything we did. We should have been buddies, but instead, Jerry was my permanent opponent. I never hated him and he never really hated me, but whatever I did, he had to do better.

I hadn’t run into Jerry in ten years, and the last time I saw him, he was trading coffee futures. We greeted each other; then, he sat down and ordered a better drink than mine. He asked what I was doing lately. I did not mention that I was writing – this job is strange enough without Jerry turning it into a win-lose game. Instead, I said that I was managing a few companies.

“Are they big companies?” he asked.

“Nah, they’re small.”

He got a disgusted look on his face, and I knew immediately what it was – he was disappointed that beating me wasn’t going to be a challenge.

Continue reading

How Greenland Became The Most Dangerous Real Estate on Earth, by Michael Kern

Trump’s proving that taking Greenland wasn’t just easily dismissed fantasy. The fantasy is that Greenland will yield the rare earths and other natural resources he envisions during his term of office, or even his lifetime if he makes himself dictator for life. Michael Kern with a cold splash of reality at oilprice.com:

  • The U.S. demand for control of Greenland is framed as an obligation of the NATO alliance, leading European diplomats to scramble for a deal that reaffirms Danish sovereignty while satisfying American political demands.
  • The supposed “win” of accessing Greenland’s vast potential rare-earth mineral wealth is undermined by the atrocious unit economics and massive infrastructure gap, which would require a significant subsidy from Europe to make mining commercially viable.
  • By threatening to coerce a NATO ally into ceding territory, the US risks defaulting on the “Rules-Based International Order” and losing the moral leverage to condemn Russian or Chinese expansionism.

The United States will officially begin negotiations to dismantle the Western world’s operating system in just about 30 minutes or so…and oil prices are up just over 1% in anticipation. 

The meeting, which will take place at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, will include Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland. 

The official agenda serves up standard diplomatic fare: “Arctic security,” “strategic partnership,” and “resource development.”

Continue reading

Ukrainians Fight Back: Family, Friends, & Neighbors Start Standing Up For Men Being Dragged Off To War, by Remix News Staff

You find heroism in unexpected places. It’s certainly unexpected to the Ukrainian conscription goons. From Remix News Staff at rmx.news:

In one incident, locals directly intervened when recruiters forced a young man into their van

In Ukraine, ongoing forced conscription and violent practices by the military are provoking civilians to finally resist in unprecedented fashion: passersby, neighbors, and family members are blocking the recruiters’ path as they try to drag civilians off the streets.

Forced conscription is causing increasing fear and distrust among civilians, reports Magyar Nemzet, but many are also no longer standing idly by: More and more footage shows passersby, neighbors, and family members stepping in when the TCK recruitment authorities show up.

People are now openly confronting the authorities, with a few lucky ones escaping conscription. Sadly, other videos show men being forced into vehicles by recruiters or beaten to death.

This past summer, József Sebestyén, a Hungarian from Transcarpathia, died during his forced conscription. The Ukrainian authorities tried by all means to cover up his case.

Continue reading

Tyrants, by Lars Møller

What makes a tyrant? From Lars Møller at americanthinker.com:

Autism article image

From Wikimedia Commons: Execution of Louis XVI (Charles Monnet, 1794)

History is replete with revolutionary figures who transformed society through “vision”, “vanity”, and “violence”—a vicious triad covering the strategy of being ideologically uncompromising, outmaneuvering rivals, and eliminating political opposition, respectively.

Maximilien Robespierre and Vladimir Lenin stand out as architects of radical political transformation. Bridging the cultural divide, their leadership styles and psychological profiles show striking similarities. Both men were pedantic ideologues driven by an unshakable belief in their own moral and intellectual superiority.

A comprehensive personality profiling of Robespierre and Lenin requires an analytical framework that transcends ideological taxonomy and historical contingency. While both men operated under conditions of revolutionary crisis, their responses to this strain were neither inevitable nor merely situational. Rather, the extremes of savagery that they authorized, rationalized, and sustained reflect enduring psychological structures that shaped their political conduct. Revolutionary atrocity, in this sense, is best understood, not as an accidental excess of upheaval but as an expressive manifestation of personality under pressure.

Continue reading

Fantasy “Loan” for Ukraine Gets Adjusted Again as EU Faces Priorities Reality Check, by Simplicius

“The fact they’re “bright” enough to twig that there can be no troops in Ukraine without Russia’s paradoxical consent suggests that their plans to introduce these troops are nothing more than performative theater to keep Ukrainian morale from catastrophically collapsing, while the purveyors of these plans know full well it will never happen.” From Simplicius at simplicius.substack.com:

Eurocrats are scrambling for a perceptually ‘sensible’ policy, as their Ukrainian project continues to crumble before their eyes.

The latest information suggests that the much-vaunted €90B “loan” that was the highlight and ‘triumph’ of von der Leyen’s rotten caucus last month—and which itself was actually a miserable downgrade from the now-memory-holed far-larger requested amount—has become another abject lesson in theatrical deception.

Major outlets now report that the so called “loan” will only provide Ukraine ~€30B, while the remaining €60B goes directly to European “arms manufacturers”.

https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/european-defense-companies-in-line-to-benefit-from-bulk-of-eus-105-billion-ukraine-loan-22d826ad

And from Bloomberg:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-14/eu-s-90-billion-ukraine-loan-to-mostly-support-european-firms

As one TG summary writes:

THE EUROPEAN UNION DECEIVED UKRAINE: Out of the promised 90 billion euros, the EU will allocate only 30 to Kyiv (15 per year), and 60 will be kept in the EU for the needs of European defense industry enterprises. Earlier, Kyiv was promised a loan of 90 billion euros in direct credits (45 per year), and the money for weapons was supposed to be provided separately from other sources.

Everyone in Ukraine wants to profit, and no one except Russia cares about its prosperity, not even its own leadership. Europeans are planning to build their own defense industry and army at Ukraine’s expense, then seize its assets to pay off debts.

Zelensky is complaining about the €90bn. What’s he going to do now?

Meanwhile, the anti-EU bloc grows with Slovakia’s announcement that it will be ending all aid to Ukraine and will not participate in the EU’s €90B phony-crony “loan”.

EU Commission planners must have read the writing on the wall about how little their pitiful funding games will actually yield for Ukraine in the long term because suddenly they’ve changed their tone. After a top official had urged that the EU must eventually “talk to Putin” it is now being reported that EU is being pressured internally to create an official negotiator role for a kind of EU envoy to Russia on the issue of Ukraine:

Continue reading

Trust him

h/t The Burning Platform