HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 02:03:58 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu) Last-Modified: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 15:32:01 GMT ETag: "366e-63bb40ac49343-gzip" Accept-Ranges: bytes Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Length: 3833 Content-Type: text/html

Content-Type: text/shitpost

Mark Dominus (陶敏修) mjd@plover.com RSS Atom I have another blog that doesn't suck. 25 recent entries Bulk liquid food transport Sister cities? Frequently asked questions about signal handling in C The silliest town name in the United States Don't get all up in my grill Jehovah's Witnesses schism More pizza heresy Followup to a Stack Exchange comment from 2014 Actors with odd names Is this a coincidence? Thing I believe About that aphorism Potamus Dark side of the Moon How to tell apart the languages of Nigeria? Carl Gauß' hat Well-ordering blah The Sun's Wish Passing thought Sisters Skinks Modok Croatian puzzle I have had this conversation more than once Archive: 2023 JF 2022: JFMAMJ   JASOND 2021: JFM 2020: JFMAMJ   JASOND 2019: JFMAMJ   JASOND 2018: JFMAMJ   JASOND 2017: ND Comments disabled

Subject: The Vampire Flying Frog Path: you​!your-host​!walldrug​!epicac​!thermostellar-bomb-20​!twirlip​!wescac​!berserker​!plovergw​!shitpost​!mjd Date: 2017-11-14T15:32:59 Newsgroup: alt.sex.vampire-frogs Message-ID: <5c09215891f65539@shitpost.plover.com> Content-Type: text/shitpost Today I got briefly excited because I learned that there is a Vampire Flying Frog. But it turns out to be disappointing. I have no serious objections to two of the three, but the frog is not actually vampiric. Its tadpoles have two fang-like protuberances. PATHETIC! It doesn't actually fly, either, but I'll give it a pass, on the same exemption that is used by the flying fox and the flying squirrel. The flying fish has a separate exemption.