| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:37:25 GMT
Server: Apache
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
Pragma: no-cache
Content-Encoding: gzip
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=d1305b3ce34abd9647f01b3eb8effc20; path=/
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
A growing boy - Scandinavia and the World

Between adding stars and removing strips, America has the most changed flag in the world.
Illustrated by honshi__x3
France Young America
53 Comments:

A growing boy
Between adding stars and removing strips, America has the most changed flag in the world.
Credits
Written by Dayvi.Illustrated by honshi__x3
France Young America
13th June 2025
Tjalve



7 months ago #9889047
6
1
I wonder if J.D. Vance has ever thanked France for the support USA got during the War of Independence.
show replies
7 months ago #9889018
4
1
A neighbor used to hang a flag on his fence that consisted of a US flag and a pro skin-blob slogan.
The flag had 11 stripes, (not 13), and 38 stars, (not 50).
It stayed up for the better part of a year.
Conclusion: Skin-blob supporters can't count.
The flag had 11 stripes, (not 13), and 38 stars, (not 50).
It stayed up for the better part of a year.
Conclusion: Skin-blob supporters can't count.
7 months ago #9888959
2
1
Most changed flag, yet one of the oldest continuous governments
show replies
7 months ago #9889037
2
0
@CorruptUser
Eh, Tynwald, Tonga, & the Papacy are older.
It really matters what how you define continuous government. However, by at least *one* definition, it qualifies as the oldest, as I recall.
That said, that's only current. Other historical governments may be longer.
And considering how things are looking, it may be losing that 'current' status over the next few months/years.
Eh, Tynwald, Tonga, & the Papacy are older.
It really matters what how you define continuous government. However, by at least *one* definition, it qualifies as the oldest, as I recall.
That said, that's only current. Other historical governments may be longer.
And considering how things are looking, it may be losing that 'current' status over the next few months/years.
7 months ago #9889035
1
0
The current 50 stars version will soon be turning 65 years old, by far the longest iteration it has ever had, followed by the 48 stars version used during both World Wars.
show replies
7 months ago #9889087
0
0
@VictorMortimer That whole point of DC was so no state could hold the National Capital. For Puerto Rico it will depend on if they ever vote to become of state instead of remaining a US territory (or vote to become fully independent), and then it would have to be approved by congress.
Honestly, I think there's a higher chance of new states forming off current ones, similar to what happened to Virginia during the Civil War.
Honestly, I think there's a higher chance of new states forming off current ones, similar to what happened to Virginia during the Civil War.
show replies
7 months ago #9889106
1
0
@rtlstien Well, I believe that when Texas joined, they had a clause saying that they could split into a maximum of 5 states if they wanted to. And I guess that clause is still there.
The problem is however the same as it was before the civil war.
Before the civil war, states joined in pairs. A slave state and a free state. The reason being that slave states would not accept a new free state, and free states would not accept a new slave state. But if one of each joined at the same time, it was acceptable for both.
And now, Republican states won't accept a new Democratic state, and Democratic states won't accept a new Republican state.
So I think now, if Texas and California both want to split up at the same time, that might actually be possible.
When it comes to DC, I fully agree with you. DC should never become a state.
However, I think they should have ONE senator. That would make an odd number of senators, and make sure that you won't get a deadlock in the senate.
The problem is however the same as it was before the civil war.
Before the civil war, states joined in pairs. A slave state and a free state. The reason being that slave states would not accept a new free state, and free states would not accept a new slave state. But if one of each joined at the same time, it was acceptable for both.
And now, Republican states won't accept a new Democratic state, and Democratic states won't accept a new Republican state.
So I think now, if Texas and California both want to split up at the same time, that might actually be possible.
When it comes to DC, I fully agree with you. DC should never become a state.
However, I think they should have ONE senator. That would make an odd number of senators, and make sure that you won't get a deadlock in the senate.
7 months ago #9889048
0
0
@electrica Well, I suppose he WAS white, both when he had 15 stars and when he had 33 stars.
It's only when he got 50 stars that his colour started to change.
It's only when he got 50 stars that his colour started to change.
Add comment: Please Sign in or create an accout to comment.



Support the comic on 








