| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 301
server: nginx
date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:54:18 GMT
content-type: application/rss+xml; charset=UTF-8
location: https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
x-hacker: Want root? Visit join.a8c.com/hacker and mention this header.
host-header: WordPress.com
link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/"
vary: accept, content-type, cookie
last-modified: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:54:17 GMT
etag: "ada98a02a0c50fea837c3069b98cb869"
x-redirect-by: WordPress
x-ac: 2.bom _dca MISS
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000
server-timing: a8c-cdn, dc;desc=bom, cache;desc=MISS;dur=410.0
HTTP/2 200
server: nginx
date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:54:18 GMT
content-type: application/rss+xml; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-hacker: Want root? Visit join.a8c.com/hacker and mention this header.
host-header: WordPress.com
link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/"
vary: accept, content-type, cookie
last-modified: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:54:18 GMT
etag: W/"727983c4c6c28314b39efd75cb7d0f5c"
content-encoding: gzip
x-ac: 2.bom _dca MISS
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000
server-timing: a8c-cdn, dc;desc=bom, cache;desc=MISS;dur=822.0
Comments for Project Implicit
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:45:27 +0000
hourly
1
https://wordpress.com/
-
Comment on The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations by bnosek
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/the-surprisingly-limited-malleability-of-implicit-racial-evaluations/#comment-78
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:45:27 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-78
In reply to Colleen.
-
Comment on The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations by Colleen
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/the-surprisingly-limited-malleability-of-implicit-racial-evaluations/#comment-77
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:31:40 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-77
I would like to see an IAT where we are trained from the beginning to associate good with black and bad with white, instead of the other way around. I just took the race and gender tests. In both cases, I had to make the “expected” associations 3 times prior to the “unexpected” associations. That is if we the researchers expectations are that we are all racist and sexist.
]]>
-
Comment on Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 U.S. presidential election by The Mind, The Science. Part Seven. « Law & Mind Sciences
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/implicit-race-attitudes-predicted-vote-in-the-2008-u-s-presidential-election/#comment-75
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:07:20 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-75
[…] there are several intriguing discussions of the various uses of IAT tests, for instance a discussion of IAT’s predictive value on the 2008 presidential election. The blog also links to new IAT […]
]]>
-
Comment on The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations by Vali
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/the-surprisingly-limited-malleability-of-implicit-racial-evaluations/#comment-67
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:47:23 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-67
I`m not sure what do you want prove or find, maesure with IAT! Please explain! Thank you!
]]>
-
Comment on Implicit stereotypes predict sex differences in science and math achievement by Caroline Simard: "Daring to Discuss Women in Science:" A Response to John Tierney | Click e-News
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-65
Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:00:22 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-65
[…] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents […]
]]>
-
Comment on Implicit stereotypes predict sex differences in science and math achievement by Caroline Simard: "Daring to Discuss Women in Science:" A Response to John Tierney
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-64
Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:38:40 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-64
[…] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents […]
]]>
-
Comment on Implicit stereotypes predict sex differences in science and math achievement by Tech & Science » Caroline Simard: "Daring to Discuss Women in Science:" A Response to John Tierney
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-63
Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:11:14 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-63
[…] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents […]
]]>
-
Comment on The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations by resveratrol
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/the-surprisingly-limited-malleability-of-implicit-racial-evaluations/#comment-60
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:07:25 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-60
Good work, your articles are very interesting, i am glad that i googled your blog
]]>
-
Comment on Predictive validity meta-analysis of the Implicit Association Test is published by KK
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/predictive-validity-meta-analysis-of-the-implicit-association-test-is-published/#comment-58
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:05:18 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-58
These tests are incapable of determining wether someone is discriminating of the specified subject matter. A lot more is going on in these tests than positive or negative associations with the specific subject in question. For example why might someone prefer heterosexuality over homosexuality or vice versa? Rather than discriminating bias could it possibly be that they prefer one over the other because they can have sex with them. One may associate homosexuality with the words painful and tragic because they or someone they know is gay and had painful or tragic experiences related to their homosexuality. This does not mean they prefer heterosexuals or have any bias towards homosexuals. A dark skinned person may prefer other dark skinned people because that is who they grew up surrounded by not because they are racist against whites. The series of photos to determine white and black preferences aren’t even in color. Hello! A lot of white people have african features and a lot of black people have caucasian features. There was one photo of a man of african heritage that had caucasian features but no people of european descent with african features. You also have to consider that facial expressions wear into a persons features over time. If you spend most of your time smiling you get smile wrinkles and frowning vice versa. Whether a person looks friendly or not can cause people to have positive or negative associations with them. A better test would have shown color photos of same aged children. I can’t stress enough that the photos should be in COLOR. This is a poor test and has no validity in accurately assessing peoples biases. I can’t believe that Harvard is funding this project. I thought the Ivy League was more “discriminating” about what they sign their names to.
]]>
-
Comment on Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 U.S. presidential election by Racial Attitudes in the Presidential Race « The Situationist
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/implicit-race-attitudes-predicted-vote-in-the-2008-u-s-presidential-election/#comment-53
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:03:13 +0000
https://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-53
[…] From Project Implicit Blog: […]
]]>
The order of the associations in each task is random. Your getting three in the same order in a row happens 1 out of 4 times. See FAQ #1 for a complete answer to this question.
]]>