| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 301
server: nginx
date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:37:38 GMT
content-type: application/rss+xml; charset=UTF-8
location: https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
x-hacker: Want root? Visit join.a8c.com/hacker and mention this header.
host-header: WordPress.com
link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/"
vary: accept, content-type, cookie
last-modified: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:37:38 GMT
etag: "c04e07e5bc1c152fc1ac9e11daafb7ec"
x-redirect-by: WordPress
x-ac: 3.bom _dca MISS
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000
server-timing: a8c-cdn, dc;desc=bom, cache;desc=MISS;dur=466.0
HTTP/2 200
server: nginx
date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:37:39 GMT
content-type: application/rss+xml; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-hacker: Want root? Visit join.a8c.com/hacker and mention this header.
host-header: WordPress.com
link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/"
vary: accept, content-type, cookie
last-modified: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:37:38 GMT
etag: W/"c04e07e5bc1c152fc1ac9e11daafb7ec"
content-encoding: gzip
x-ac: 1.bom _dca MISS
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000
server-timing: a8c-cdn, dc;desc=bom, cache;desc=MISS;dur=427.0
Comments for pdfLibrary
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com
selected texts in pdf format
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:52:09 +0000
hourly
1
https://wordpress.com/
-
Comment on derrida / force of law by elif
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/derrida-force-of-law/#comment-49
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:52:09 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/derrida-force-of-law/#comment-49
Thank you for the great job! We need more people like you. I appreciate your effort.
]]>
-
Comment on derrida / force of law by Legal Articles
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/derrida-force-of-law/#comment-44
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:43:38 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/derrida-force-of-law/#comment-44
Legal Articles…
-
Comment on austin / performative utterances by Pedro Posada
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/austin-performative-utterances/#comment-42
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:38:45 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/austin-performative-utterances/#comment-42
Thanks
]]>
-
Comment on agamben / form of life by Whatever Future: Interview with Alexander R. Galloway
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-32
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:04:42 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-32
[…] own contribution to an older political discourse by evolving existing concepts such as the “form-of-life” or the “whatever singularity,” in addition to developing new ones such as the […]
]]>
-
Comment on agamben / form of life by JohnRQ
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-31
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:47:04 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-31
классный у вас блог, мне очень нравится
]]>
-
Comment on heidegger / art and space by torben
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/heidegger-art-and-space/#comment-27
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:23:48 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/heidegger-art-and-space/#comment-27
thanks for making this text available,
]]>
-
Comment on agamben / form of life by antonas
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-25
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:47:20 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-25
In reply to Homework « Imperfect Composition.
-
Comment on agamben / form of life by Homework « Imperfect Composition
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-24
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:28:56 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-24
[…] One recurrent problem encountered by this theoretical tradition, however, is the problem of agency. Much of the theory is an attempt to account for the divergent particularities of power relations under capitalism (or ‘empire’), and it is difficult to see where or rather how there is room for collective projects except for the forms of ’swarming’ and ‘networked resistance’ that we discussed in class so far. This is a major problem. I think as an ontology of specificity (of that which shapes bodies, subjects, and inter-subjectivity, thus community, at the micro level), the theory works in a descriptive sense, but it also undermines more collective understandings of politics through its refusal of older forms of commonality. Or, rather, the theory does not seem to be being used to enrich our understandings of actually-existing forms of commonality besides generic notions of the ‘multitude.’ Isn’t there room here for using this theory for unpacking, but also in some ways affirming, the forms of commonality present in classic categories of social thought at the level of organization or at the level of identity beyond just very generic instances of ‘multitude’: ie, at level of the ‘party,’ the ‘collective,’ the ‘movement,’ or the ‘indigenous,’ ‘the worker,’ ‘women,’ ‘queer,’ or even perhaps ’species’ (but that is perhaps getting too generic, and indeed some of the theory is focused on unpacking notions about ‘forms of life‘)? […]
]]>
-
Comment on agamben / form of life by Movements, financial crisis, and the theory of the multitude « Bourgeois Sociology
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-21
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:24:57 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/agamben-form-of-life/#comment-21
[…] One recurrent problem encountered by this theoretical tradition, however, is the problem of agency. Much of the theory is an attempt to account for the divergent particularities of power relations under capitalism (or ‘empire’), and it is difficult to see where or rather how there is room for collective projects except for the forms of ’swarming’ and ‘networked resistance’ that we discussed in class so far. This is a major problem. I think as an ontology of specificity (of that which shapes bodies, subjects, and inter-subjectivity, thus community, at the micro level), the theory works in a descriptive sense, but it also undermines more collective understandings of politics through its refusal of older forms of commonality. Or, rather, theory does not seem to be being used to enrich our understandings of actually-existing forms of commonality besides generic notions of the ‘multitude.’ Isn’t there room here for using this theory for unpacking, but also in some ways affirming, the forms of commonality present in classic categories of social thought at the level of organization or at the level of identity beyond just very generic instances of ‘multitute’: ie, at level of the ‘party,’ the ‘collective,’ the ‘movement,’ or the ‘indigenous,’ ‘the worker,’ ‘women,’ ‘queer,’ or even perhaps ’species’ (but that is perhaps getting too generic, and indeed some of the theory is focused on unpacking notions about ‘forms of life‘)? […]
]]>
-
Comment on Virilio The Vision Machine by Nathan
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/virilio-the-vision-machine/#comment-15
Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:57:44 +0000
https://pdflibrary.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-15
nice to see more bloggers participating in the revolution of open knowledge. more here too.
]]>
[…]derrida / force of law « pdfLibrary[…]…
]]>very interested about “netwrked resistance”, please add links when you can
]]>