| CARVIEW |
Select Language
Qualitative Comparisons on NVS
Compared to baselines, we obtain: 1) more coherent fusion from input views, 2) superior reconstruction from limited image overlap, 3) enhanced geometry reconstruction in non-overlapping regions.
Comparisons of Cross-dataset Generalization
Our model can better zero-shot transfer to out-of-distribution data than SOTA pose-required methods. MVSplat and pixelSplat struggle to smoothly merge the underlying geometry and appearance of different input views, whereas our NoPoSplat renders competitive and holistic novel views due to the design that outputs Gaussians in a canonical coordinate system
BibTeX
@article{ye2024noposplat,
title = {No Pose, No Problem: Surprisingly Simple 3D Gaussian Splats from Sparse Unposed Images},
author = {Ye, Botao and Liu, Sifei and Xu, Haofei and Xueting, Li and Pollefeys, Marc and Yang, Ming-Hsuan and Songyou, Peng},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24207},
year = {2024}
}