DOIs from Elsevier v Sci-Hub

I'm curious about which articles Elsevier selected in their case against Sci-Hub. These articles are described as "List of 100 Representative Elsevier Works Infringed by Sci‐Hub and LibGen". For each of these articles, Sci-Hub [was fined](https://newsroom.publishers.org/the-association-of-american-publishers-welcomes-major-judgement-against-sci-hub-pirate-site/) $150,000.

I extracted the list from [this document](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355308/88/elsevier-inc-v-sci-hub/): [`elsevier-dois.txt`](https://github.com/greenelab/scihub/files/1331204/elsevier-dois.txt). Here are the links to the 100 articles:

<details>
<summary>Expand to see articles</summary>

1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.014
2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.001
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.016
4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.178
5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.04.006
6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.03.074
7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.037
8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2013.04.008
9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.061
10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.02.019
11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.08.002
12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.083
13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013
14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.070
15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.03.041
16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.018
17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.020
18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.06.017
19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.043
20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.02.045
21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.05.018
22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.100
23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.08.002
24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.042
25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.001
26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.034
27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2013.09.007
28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.11.021
29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2015.05.024
30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2007.12.005
31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2013.11.038
32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.029
33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.035
34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.04.015
35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.04.043
36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.023
37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.010
38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.026
39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.02.009
40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.057
41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.10.015
42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2013.07.004
43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2015.07.001
44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.006
45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.017
46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2013.03.007
47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.09.020
48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2014.06.006
49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.027
50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.02.033
51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.034
52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.10.011
53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.002
54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.003
55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.11.004
56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.10.027
57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.002
58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.090
59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.019
60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.004
61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.09.001
62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.05.016
63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2014.03.010
64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2014.09.016
65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.055
66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.07.021
67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.016
68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.008
69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.016
70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.08.004
71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.04.004
72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.035
73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.04.010
74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.08.063
75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.07.011
76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.07.014
77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.071
78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.07.003
79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.072
80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.024
81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.004
82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.06.006
83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.02.007
84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2015.11.001
85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.100
86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.05.006
87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.103
88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.07.019
89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.02.005
90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.018
91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.04.116
92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2014.10.013
93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.033
94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.025
95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.06.022
96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.133
97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.052
98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.016
99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.06.005
100. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411549-1.00016-8
</details>


The [judgement](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355308/87/elsevier-inc-v-sci-hub/) references these "Copyrighted Works" stating:

> Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), Elsevier is awarded statutory damages against the Defendants for copyright infringement in the amount of $150,000 for each of the 100 infringed copyrights identified in Exhibit A to this Permanent Injunction, for a total of $15,000,000, which award shall bear interest from the date of this Permanent Injunction at the rate provided by law.


Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

DOIs from Elsevier v Sci-Hub #39

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

DOIs from Elsevier v Sci-Hub #39

Description

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions