You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@enapupe yup yup, I'll pair up the two. These are likely to go into 8.0 as the behavior probably constitutes a breaking change, or at least it has a chance to be "breaking".
I was chatting with @developit about this PR today and he suggested adding a check to see if the value being set is an object and if so, falling back to using a property setter. I tried to outline the expected behavior in this comment (sorry it's a bit long!)
Since this is opened against v8, and the original issue (#492) has been closed, I'm going to close this PR. If there is a another situation where this change would be beneficial in Preact X, open a new issue with that case, and we'll take a look.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wasn't able to run react tests against this change but I tried to change the logic as minimum as possible.
ref #492