by Mr Penguin | Jan 14, 2026 |
Sponsor of anti-crypto legislation
The new bill would require crypto ATM’s to implement KYC, delay transactions for 72-hours, limit transaction sizes, and implement blockchain analytics.
Come out and testify against this anti-consumer anti-liberty bill at the committee hearing being held on Tuesday January 27th:
Address: 107 N. Main St., Concord, NH 03301
For more information: https://bills.nhliberty.org/bills/2026/SB482
by Mr Penguin | Jan 14, 2026 |
Popular support for NH Independence
In about a week from now a hearing will be held to establish a New Hampshire Independence Committee to study the means by which independence will be established in New Hampshire.
NH House Bill 1441 Public Hearing: 01/23/2026 01:00 pm GP 228
https://gc.nh.gov/house/legislation/billinfo.aspx?id=1935&sy=
“(Title) establishing a commission to study the economic, legal, and sociological aspects of New Hampshire exerting its sovereign state rights.”
Organizers are asking people to turn out in droves to support the legislation:
“Currently Albertans are turning out by the hundreds to sign an independence referendum. We have legislation already proposed. All you have to do is support it. :)”
The state house address is:
107 North Main Street, Concord, NH 03301
The temporary state house address is:
1 Granite Place
Concord, NH 03301
“I would draw your attention to following notice of the hearing on HB1441 – a NH independence study commission – which has been scheduled for Friday, January 23, at 1 PM, at Granite Place in Concord. ‘Granite Place’ is the temporary replacement for the Legislative Office Building while it is being refurbished over the course of this legislative year.”
To keep informed of updates on New Hampshire independence join the mailing list at NHexit.org
by Mr Penguin | Jan 8, 2026 |
Tax Fight Flyer
Today a hearing for the dismissal of a lawsuit was brought before the Rockingham Superior court. Citizens sued over the improper and unfair property assessment values and an inability to get a fair shot with tax abatement during the appeals processes.
Each side argued its case with a mathematician brought in to explain the illegal nature of the taxation. This however wasn’t the time, though provided a bit of context for the court. Today was primarily to defend the state’s argument that the lawsuit should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Fore more information click the more button below and watch the video of the hearing.
(more…)
by Highline | Nov 17, 2025 |
Judge Patrick W. Ryan has issued an order regarding my Motion To Refrain From Authorizing Physical Force to Demand Respect and Motion To Dismiss.
The Judge has agreed to allow me to sit and not force me to respect the State of New Hampshire. I like this Judge already. He, personally as a New Hampshire judicial officer, I will stand up for and show respect.
The Judge has also agreed to give me five minutes to make my constitutional argument that Part I, Article 10 is implicated with the continued enforcement of victimless crimes when state officers are above the same laws everyone else must follow.
I will ask that the Judge swear me in so I may offer testimony regarding my experiences as a non-lawyer representative representing Jason Talley in 2011/2012.
The hearing is at 9:15AM on 12/05/25 at the Keene District Court.
by ridley | Nov 13, 2025 |
Federal restrictions on just one thing in the 1980s…led to over 10,000 birth defects.
Instead of political regulating, what are some better options for facing the dangers of AI?
While out exercising earlier this year, I spotted a movie crew at work and stopped to watch. Apparently the only onlooker, I attracted as much attention from the crew as it did from me…and one of the participants came over to say hi.
“It’s probably my last chance to see a human film crew in action,” I told him.
(more…)
by Highline | Nov 1, 2025 |
Does Part I, Article 10 of the New Hampshire Constitution mean anything other than feel good rhetoric to those of us who want fair government?
Let us find out: Motion For Interlocutory Transfer.
-/-
But wait — it gets worse.
In 1975, the NH Supreme Court (State v. Miller) quietly expanded police arrest power to any violation — even spitting on the sidewalk. Miller said violations stay in the “criminal process” — so cops can arrest, even though there’s no jail, no criminal record, no real harm. But Miller never asked the 1784 question: “Where in the Constitution does it say you can seize a free man for a fine?” Answer: Nowhere.
Part I, Article 10 says no arrest but for crime or breach of the peace.
The Framers didn’t write “submit to any badge with probable cause.”
They wrote: “Submission to arbitrary power is slavish and absurd.” This case isn’t just about my petition.
It’s about whether New Hampshire will keep arresting people for being human. Stay tuned. The Attorney General’s response is coming. And when it does — we’ll show them 1784 in high definition.
by Highline | Oct 27, 2025 |
Today I file a lawsuit against the New Hampshire Attorney General under the premise that state law mandates what the Constitution describes as “absurd” and “slavish.” You’re not a slave to the criminal gang, are you?
Here is my Petition For A Declaratory Judgement that New Hampshire’s resisting arrest statute is unconstitutional as it forbids non-violent resistance when you’re being arrested on illegal charges.
I’m not a trained lawyer… so I make mistakes.
Your critique is more than welcome!
I just wanted to add, although I didn’t make this argument in my petition, New Hampshire is a state that has codified an affirmative defense to physically wrestling an officers gun away from him or her if they’re willfully making a false arrest.
Oh yes they have (section III.)
If you can physically take control of a police officers gun who is making a bad arrest legally, I’d say my argument is rather tame: going limp or passive resistance should be legal to an illegal arrest.
Logical question for you high IQ people out there: How can the State criminalize non-violent refusal to a felony… while immunizing violent defense against the same act?
