would like to see some sort of progress. something to cheer for.

sq4n0h izyarskcefan

AND Credited you. ThanX. Excellent writing!

How’s about we talk to you about Guest Authoring?

F4SU6e qcfyojuggfvw

Help, I’ve been informed and I can’t become iganornt.

Why the hell have I been reading over 50 pages of theory a week for nearly three semesters in a Master’s program when I could have just come here and read what all those words were trying to tell me in two sentences?

I will likely quote you in a paper sooner rather than later. Should you object to this, you may see my attorney who has a forged copy of your consent filed with all due diligence beside the ones permitting me to end sentences on prepositions, to dangle modifiers and to drink four-day old still-steeping tea directly from the pot…

So much for my youthful idealism. He’s all just pie-in-the-sky anyway.

I miss you. Keep writing.

weird, because I’m pretty sure it was mentioning your name that got Julian Assange into all that trouble in Sweden.

I agree too that his message is what is important, and despite our strong want to pollute in spite of his shit personality…(trust me I wanna!) we need to look at the fact that he has done great things…and just leave it at that. I do think that if his legacy is sooo important to him, then he should polish up on his social graces because he will lose a lot of soldiers in his fight.

Lesson learned: Don’t idolize people that we only have a media picture of…take their ideas and outcomes for what they are (brilliant or not) and try not to imagine how perfect they are as people. Total wake up call for me!

Du Guesclin was executed on Monday September 2nd 1365. He was hung, trampled, drowned and finally drawn and quartered.

All sources I have found state he died in 1380, of dysentery.

Is this a nice fiction, having him die on the first Monday of September? It seems a trifle silly, as contradictary information is so easily found.

Regardless of whether Islam is the cause or just an ingredient of the violent behavior seen in the middle east, it is not causing purely good behavior. Neither is the Bible. Wormwood admitted that what the Bible says and what it MEANS to say are two different things…why? The answer is simple: Because we know today that the way things are is different from the way we used to think they were. The Bible/Quran couldn’t change, so we just changed how we read it. Great, good, awesome – we needed to do this or we were doomed to live in the dark ages forever.

However there is no doubt that the Quran either promotes, condones or enables the behaviors we see – violent behavior toward apostates, people who speak ill of Islam, women, homosexuals, etc. etc. Now these behaviors are explicitly mentioned in the quran and they APPEAR to be permitted/encouraged. So regardless of whether the behavior is cultural and written into the Quran, or religious and adopted into culture, the Quran is a problem and is not helping the culture move to a more peaceful norm.

The Bible is a less extreme example, but it is still a hinderance to modern morality. Defending these books is arguing to keep traces of ancient morality in our modern world. It is allowing passages that seem to condone slavery, discrimination, oppression. Whether we still observe these verses or not, it is dangerous to keep them around…we all know that they are misused, but they are defended as sacred all the same.