Category Archives: fantasy

Redefining a fantasy race.

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On Absolute Right the question was asked: Redefining a fantasy race? Basicly what she wants to do is take gnomes of folklore create a new race of humans based on the folk lore of gnomes, totaly creating a differant race with the same name. Anyways, here is what I had to say on it:

I say go with it.

I do this sort of thing all the time. For example, my most used MC (who has appeared in more than 30 stories now and has his own website, https://www.myspace.con/etioleswanzen) is a Siren (an evil vampire-like type of mermaid from ancient myth). There is a story behind his creation:

I’ve always loved mermaids. How often do you see mermaids? All the time. How often do you see mermen? Not too often, but they do show up.

Now, how often do you see female sirens? Rarely. How often do you see a male siren? Never. Okay, that bothered me. I mean, what are they, amebeas? There has to be male sirens around somewhere in order to keep the race going, right?

Now here’s the biggie: How often do you see mermaids and sirens as they were originally potraied: evil blood-thirsty water sprites, that feed on human flesh, and caused great storms when angry? Never. Never! Everyone writes about cute cuddly lovey dovey happy mermaids that grant wishes and over all are way to human in mentality. This too bothered me, because sirens are not human, and they should not be expected to act or think or rationalize like humans.

Well, I created an entire “universe” based on this theory alone, and in the end, I developed a race of Sirens that, though they still somewhat reselmbed sirens of myth, they were now a totally unique race, created by me.

Well, for me, I just snubbed my nose at years of tradition and made my sirens to be the way I wanted them to be. Of course, I didn’t stop with changing just sirens either: My griffons are not griffons as tradtion knows them, neither are my Phookas, or my wizards for that matter.

As for the gnomes… I like the ideas, I say go with it.

One poster said:

If I recall, until Lord of the Rings, if you said ‘elves’ everyone would think of the little people who lived in mushrooms.

and as I only just discovered LOTR from the movies… I was stunned to see elves that were not of the tiny, Santa’s toy shop variety. Whenever I write about elves, they are less than 2 feet tall and live in hallow trees or Santa’s workshop. Tolkien’s elves are just too foriegn and unelf like to me. I don’t like them.

Of course I did grow up on a heavy dose of The Smurfs too, so blue skinned elves living in mushrooms is my other thought when I think elves.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

>Redefining a fantasy race.

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On Absolute Right the question was asked: Redefining a fantasy race? Basicly what she wants to do is take gnomes of folklore create a new race of humans based on the folk lore of gnomes, totaly creating a differant race with the same name. Anyways, here is what I had to say on it:

I say go with it.

I do this sort of thing all the time. For example, my most used MC (who has appeared in more than 30 stories now and has his own website, https://www.myspace.con/etioleswanzen) is a Siren (an evil vampire-like type of mermaid from ancient myth). There is a story behind his creation:

I’ve always loved mermaids. How often do you see mermaids? All the time. How often do you see mermen? Not too often, but they do show up.

Now, how often do you see female sirens? Rarely. How often do you see a male siren? Never. Okay, that bothered me. I mean, what are they, amebeas? There has to be male sirens around somewhere in order to keep the race going, right?

Now here’s the biggie: How often do you see mermaids and sirens as they were originally potraied: evil blood-thirsty water sprites, that feed on human flesh, and caused great storms when angry? Never. Never! Everyone writes about cute cuddly lovey dovey happy mermaids that grant wishes and over all are way to human in mentality. This too bothered me, because sirens are not human, and they should not be expected to act or think or rationalize like humans.

Well, I created an entire “universe” based on this theory alone, and in the end, I developed a race of Sirens that, though they still somewhat reselmbed sirens of myth, they were now a totally unique race, created by me.

Well, for me, I just snubbed my nose at years of tradition and made my sirens to be the way I wanted them to be. Of course, I didn’t stop with changing just sirens either: My griffons are not griffons as tradtion knows them, neither are my Phookas, or my wizards for that matter.

As for the gnomes… I like the ideas, I say go with it.

One poster said:

If I recall, until Lord of the Rings, if you said ‘elves’ everyone would think of the little people who lived in mushrooms.

and as I only just discovered LOTR from the movies… I was stunned to see elves that were not of the tiny, Santa’s toy shop variety. Whenever I write about elves, they are less than 2 feet tall and live in hallow trees or Santa’s workshop. Tolkien’s elves are just too foriegn and unelf like to me. I don’t like them.

Of course I did grow up on a heavy dose of The Smurfs too, so blue skinned elves living in mushrooms is my other thought when I think elves.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Redefining a fantasy race.

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On Absolute Right the question was asked: Redefining a fantasy race? Basicly what she wants to do is take gnomes of folklore create a new race of humans based on the folk lore of gnomes, totaly creating a differant race with the same name. Anyways, here is what I had to say on it:

I say go with it.

I do this sort of thing all the time. For example, my most used MC (who has appeared in more than 30 stories now and has his own website, https://www.myspace.con/etioleswanzen) is a Siren (an evil vampire-like type of mermaid from ancient myth). There is a story behind his creation:

I’ve always loved mermaids. How often do you see mermaids? All the time. How often do you see mermen? Not too often, but they do show up.

Now, how often do you see female sirens? Rarely. How often do you see a male siren? Never. Okay, that bothered me. I mean, what are they, amebeas? There has to be male sirens around somewhere in order to keep the race going, right?

Now here’s the biggie: How often do you see mermaids and sirens as they were originally potraied: evil blood-thirsty water sprites, that feed on human flesh, and caused great storms when angry? Never. Never! Everyone writes about cute cuddly lovey dovey happy mermaids that grant wishes and over all are way to human in mentality. This too bothered me, because sirens are not human, and they should not be expected to act or think or rationalize like humans.

Well, I created an entire “universe” based on this theory alone, and in the end, I developed a race of Sirens that, though they still somewhat reselmbed sirens of myth, they were now a totally unique race, created by me.

Well, for me, I just snubbed my nose at years of tradition and made my sirens to be the way I wanted them to be. Of course, I didn’t stop with changing just sirens either: My griffons are not griffons as tradtion knows them, neither are my Phookas, or my wizards for that matter.

As for the gnomes… I like the ideas, I say go with it.

One poster said:

If I recall, until Lord of the Rings, if you said ‘elves’ everyone would think of the little people who lived in mushrooms.

and as I only just discovered LOTR from the movies… I was stunned to see elves that were not of the tiny, Santa’s toy shop variety. Whenever I write about elves, they are less than 2 feet tall and live in hallow trees or Santa’s workshop. Tolkien’s elves are just too foriegn and unelf like to me. I don’t like them.

Of course I did grow up on a heavy dose of The Smurfs too, so blue skinned elves living in mushrooms is my other thought when I think elves.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

testing tags

having a problem getting posts to show up… testing to see if tags are working yet

>Good reason for large numbers of people disappearing?

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On the NaNoWriMo Forums the question was asked:

[quote=jamers503]I am doing my NaNo in December this year because November was a lousy time this year. Too many other things.

So, this year my novel is going the post-apocalyptic route. I didn’t want it to, but it did. The plot is a large-scale, highly-destructive meteor shower blankets the earth and knocks pretty much everything out. Power, satellites, all organization. Now, my 4 MCs survived the initial shower and were in the country. They’re hiking back to the city (pop. about 150,000, for the sake of the story) to find out what’s going on. not everything is craters, though about 50% of the landscape was hit. Meaning 50% of houses, cars, people, etc. But I want less people in my novel.

Any ideas on something that would severely reduce the number of people encountered?
———-

2007 – Untitled, but gonna win

2006 – Tucker Martine (50,180)

[/quote]

My first thought is, what about aliens? Could they have whisked away tons of people just before the event?

Looting gone wrong… people do weird things when they panic… like there’s no electricity, but folks are runing into what’s left of WalMart and stealing PlayStation 3’s anyways, and a riot breaks out, cause there is only one left in the store so one guy goes nuts and kills the rest of the mob with a machine gun, he’d looted out of the local army barracks? After he’s killed everyone and a run off with the PS3, he realizes that without electricity he can’t use it anyways…. weird stuff like that could decrease the surplas population quite a bit.

Disease… if you’ve got a lot of dead bodies laying in the streets, it won’t be very long before the people who survived, start to get boubonic plauge and other such diseases…. an outbreak of plauge could kill off 6 million people in less than a month… it did it before in the 1600’s.

The general stupidity of city folk, will kill off quite a few of them. No electricity = no hospitals, no gas stations, no food coming into cities, no tap water, and no heat. People will have to eat wild plants for food, most can’t tell a dandylion from a daisy, and how many city folks know you can eat dandylions? Here’s a question: how many city folks know that you can eat grass? Corn, wheat, rye, oat, and all other grains, are just grass seed… could YOU tell which grass seed was which? No heat is a biggie… in Maine 5 people die each year from gas poisoning, because they do not know to not use a gas heater indoors. And 10 families end up hospitailized because they do not know the same thing. And 30 families lose their homes, because they didn’t know not to light a wood fire with gas and burned their houses down. Farmers and country folk know better because they live with out electricity, 40% of the year anyways… city folk, are quite frankly stupid when it comes to basic survival skills and living off the land.

Apocolyptic religons, that sacrific the unworthy? People in a panic tend to go off on religous frenzies.

Vegitation destroied, so surviors start eating the weaker people?

Wild animals have nothing to eat, so start attacking people.

Zombies?

Vampires?

Werewolves?

————-

Publishing Your Novel? Read This First!
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Good reason for large numbers of people disappearing?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On the NaNoWriMo Forums the question was asked:

[quote=jamers503]I am doing my NaNo in December this year because November was a lousy time this year. Too many other things.

So, this year my novel is going the post-apocalyptic route. I didn’t want it to, but it did. The plot is a large-scale, highly-destructive meteor shower blankets the earth and knocks pretty much everything out. Power, satellites, all organization. Now, my 4 MCs survived the initial shower and were in the country. They’re hiking back to the city (pop. about 150,000, for the sake of the story) to find out what’s going on. not everything is craters, though about 50% of the landscape was hit. Meaning 50% of houses, cars, people, etc. But I want less people in my novel.

Any ideas on something that would severely reduce the number of people encountered?
———-

2007 – Untitled, but gonna win

2006 – Tucker Martine (50,180)

[/quote]

My first thought is, what about aliens? Could they have whisked away tons of people just before the event?

Looting gone wrong… people do weird things when they panic… like there’s no electricity, but folks are runing into what’s left of WalMart and stealing PlayStation 3’s anyways, and a riot breaks out, cause there is only one left in the store so one guy goes nuts and kills the rest of the mob with a machine gun, he’d looted out of the local army barracks? After he’s killed everyone and a run off with the PS3, he realizes that without electricity he can’t use it anyways…. weird stuff like that could decrease the surplas population quite a bit.

Disease… if you’ve got a lot of dead bodies laying in the streets, it won’t be very long before the people who survived, start to get boubonic plauge and other such diseases…. an outbreak of plauge could kill off 6 million people in less than a month… it did it before in the 1600’s.

The general stupidity of city folk, will kill off quite a few of them. No electricity = no hospitals, no gas stations, no food coming into cities, no tap water, and no heat. People will have to eat wild plants for food, most can’t tell a dandylion from a daisy, and how many city folks know you can eat dandylions? Here’s a question: how many city folks know that you can eat grass? Corn, wheat, rye, oat, and all other grains, are just grass seed… could YOU tell which grass seed was which? No heat is a biggie… in Maine 5 people die each year from gas poisoning, because they do not know to not use a gas heater indoors. And 10 families end up hospitailized because they do not know the same thing. And 30 families lose their homes, because they didn’t know not to light a wood fire with gas and burned their houses down. Farmers and country folk know better because they live with out electricity, 40% of the year anyways… city folk, are quite frankly stupid when it comes to basic survival skills and living off the land.

Apocolyptic religons, that sacrific the unworthy? People in a panic tend to go off on religous frenzies.

Vegitation destroied, so surviors start eating the weaker people?

Wild animals have nothing to eat, so start attacking people.

Zombies?

Vampires?

Werewolves?

————-

Publishing Your Novel? Read This First!
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Good reason for large numbers of people disappearing?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On the NaNoWriMo Forums the question was asked:

[quote=jamers503]I am doing my NaNo in December this year because November was a lousy time this year. Too many other things.

So, this year my novel is going the post-apocalyptic route. I didn’t want it to, but it did. The plot is a large-scale, highly-destructive meteor shower blankets the earth and knocks pretty much everything out. Power, satellites, all organization. Now, my 4 MCs survived the initial shower and were in the country. They’re hiking back to the city (pop. about 150,000, for the sake of the story) to find out what’s going on. not everything is craters, though about 50% of the landscape was hit. Meaning 50% of houses, cars, people, etc. But I want less people in my novel.

Any ideas on something that would severely reduce the number of people encountered?
———-

2007 – Untitled, but gonna win

2006 – Tucker Martine (50,180)

[/quote]

My first thought is, what about aliens? Could they have whisked away tons of people just before the event?

Looting gone wrong… people do weird things when they panic… like there’s no electricity, but folks are runing into what’s left of WalMart and stealing PlayStation 3’s anyways, and a riot breaks out, cause there is only one left in the store so one guy goes nuts and kills the rest of the mob with a machine gun, he’d looted out of the local army barracks? After he’s killed everyone and a run off with the PS3, he realizes that without electricity he can’t use it anyways…. weird stuff like that could decrease the surplas population quite a bit.

Disease… if you’ve got a lot of dead bodies laying in the streets, it won’t be very long before the people who survived, start to get boubonic plauge and other such diseases…. an outbreak of plauge could kill off 6 million people in less than a month… it did it before in the 1600’s.

The general stupidity of city folk, will kill off quite a few of them. No electricity = no hospitals, no gas stations, no food coming into cities, no tap water, and no heat. People will have to eat wild plants for food, most can’t tell a dandylion from a daisy, and how many city folks know you can eat dandylions? Here’s a question: how many city folks know that you can eat grass? Corn, wheat, rye, oat, and all other grains, are just grass seed… could YOU tell which grass seed was which? No heat is a biggie… in Maine 5 people die each year from gas poisoning, because they do not know to not use a gas heater indoors. And 10 families end up hospitailized because they do not know the same thing. And 30 families lose their homes, because they didn’t know not to light a wood fire with gas and burned their houses down. Farmers and country folk know better because they live with out electricity, 40% of the year anyways… city folk, are quite frankly stupid when it comes to basic survival skills and living off the land.

Apocolyptic religons, that sacrific the unworthy? People in a panic tend to go off on religous frenzies.

Vegitation destroied, so surviors start eating the weaker people?

Wild animals have nothing to eat, so start attacking people.

Zombies?

Vampires?

Werewolves?

————-

Publishing Your Novel? Read This First!
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Dragons and DragonRiders

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On the NaNoWriMo Forums one poster asks the question:

Does having dragonriders make my novel automatically cliche/unmarketable?

After reading the entire rather long post, my first thought was:

    Dragonriders! hmmm… cool art on the covers of the Pern books! Yay for fantasy art!

My second thought was…

    huh? I can’t believe I bought all those books for the cover art! I hve yet to read one of them!

Than my thoughts turned too:

    Eragon… great movie, I’ll have to read the book someday.

Well, when it comes to dragons and dragonriders, I love them, however, every dragon/dragonrider book I’ve ever started to read, I put away before I reached the end of the first chapter. So, I’ve never actually read a dragonrider story, and can’t say wither or not yours is cliche. Why have I never read one before? Well, I start reading and by the third or second page my mind goes:

    Great idea, but bad story.
    Great idea, but bad writing.
    Great idea, but why the hell are the dragons talking?
    Great idea, but why aren’t the dragons eating people?
    Great idea, but I just don’t see dragons the same way.

In other words, I love the whole idea of dragons and dragonriders, I just don’t like the way most writers handle them. For me, when I think dragon, I think: big, firebreathing, maneating, monster. Yet when I start reading these books, I am disapointed to find that the dragons are peaceful, talking, wish-granters or some other such lovey-dovey thing. In my mind, I think of dragons as being a lot like Jurrasic Park’s T-rex: big, mean, ruthless, ready to fight, eating everything in sight, and acting like a… like an animal. Dragons are animals after all, big dino-type lizards to be exact, so why do writers always potray them as gentle loving and acting way to much like humans? I want to see some dragons that actualy act like dragons, not dragons that act like humans, but I’ve yet to find and writers who write their dragons like that.

So, I will continue to love dragons and buy dragon books for the cover art, and someday I hope to run across a book that has dragons that fit my notions of what I think dragons are like.

I wouldn’t worry about cliches and such… just write from your heart and let your characters lead your story in the right direction. It’s your story, so write it your way.

————-

Publishing Your Novel? Read This First!
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Dragons and DragonRiders

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

On the NaNoWriMo Forums one poster asks the question:

Does having dragonriders make my novel automatically cliche/unmarketable?

After reading the entire rather long post, my first thought was:

    Dragonriders! hmmm… cool art on the covers of the Pern books! Yay for fantasy art!

My second thought was…

    huh? I can’t believe I bought all those books for the cover art! I hve yet to read one of them!

Than my thoughts turned too:

    Eragon… great movie, I’ll have to read the book someday.

Well, when it comes to dragons and dragonriders, I love them, however, every dragon/dragonrider book I’ve ever started to read, I put away before I reached the end of the first chapter. So, I’ve never actually read a dragonrider story, and can’t say wither or not yours is cliche. Why have I never read one before? Well, I start reading and by the third or second page my mind goes:

    Great idea, but bad story.
    Great idea, but bad writing.
    Great idea, but why the hell are the dragons talking?
    Great idea, but why aren’t the dragons eating people?
    Great idea, but I just don’t see dragons the same way.

In other words, I love the whole idea of dragons and dragonriders, I just don’t like the way most writers handle them. For me, when I think dragon, I think: big, firebreathing, maneating, monster. Yet when I start reading these books, I am disapointed to find that the dragons are peaceful, talking, wish-granters or some other such lovey-dovey thing. In my mind, I think of dragons as being a lot like Jurrasic Park’s T-rex: big, mean, ruthless, ready to fight, eating everything in sight, and acting like a… like an animal. Dragons are animals after all, big dino-type lizards to be exact, so why do writers always potray them as gentle loving and acting way to much like humans? I want to see some dragons that actualy act like dragons, not dragons that act like humans, but I’ve yet to find and writers who write their dragons like that.

So, I will continue to love dragons and buy dragon books for the cover art, and someday I hope to run across a book that has dragons that fit my notions of what I think dragons are like.

I wouldn’t worry about cliches and such… just write from your heart and let your characters lead your story in the right direction. It’s your story, so write it your way.

————-

Publishing Your Novel? Read This First!
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Vampires

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I found this question on NaNoWriMo Forums and felt I could not pass it by without throwing in my 2 cents:

[quote=Ginger Brown]Drinking blood when not a vampire. Just a good (if icky) source of iron, or would it actually do anything negative to you physically?
[/quote]

I’m wondering how you can drink blood and not be a vampire?

Vampires are a very real thing, though reality is far differant from the undead fictional ones. The dictionary (and medical doctors too) say that a vampire is anyone (or any thing –animals included) that makes a habit of drinking blood. It’s actualy one of the more common mental illnesses, and yes, the correct medical term for it is: vampirism. From what I’ve read, real vampires are anorexnics and they drink blood as a way to purge themselves, because the stomach can not tolerate blood in it. It is the constant vomitng that also causes them to be very thin, have red-tinted eyes and very pale skin (both symptoms of malnutrition).

Fictional vampires are a completely differant matter:

In ancient mythology a vampire was a winged, horned, beast with leathery skin and a rather dragon-like appearance that not only drank the blood of humans and cows, but also ate their flesh as well.

As the years passed the myth evolved to say that they were not demon beasts, but rather evil men that came back to life after dieing.

In the Gothic Revival Period (Late Victorian era), everything changed with the writing of the book Dracula. However, it wouldn’t be until Bela Lugosi’s movie version of Dracula, that the general public would start thinking of vampires as demon-possessed-undeads.

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Vampires

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I found this question on NaNoWriMo Forums and felt I could not pass it by without throwing in my 2 cents:

[quote=Ginger Brown]Drinking blood when not a vampire. Just a good (if icky) source of iron, or would it actually do anything negative to you physically?
[/quote]

I’m wondering how you can drink blood and not be a vampire?

Vampires are a very real thing, though reality is far differant from the undead fictional ones. The dictionary (and medical doctors too) say that a vampire is anyone (or any thing –animals included) that makes a habit of drinking blood. It’s actualy one of the more common mental illnesses, and yes, the correct medical term for it is: vampirism. From what I’ve read, real vampires are anorexnics and they drink blood as a way to purge themselves, because the stomach can not tolerate blood in it. It is the constant vomitng that also causes them to be very thin, have red-tinted eyes and very pale skin (both symptoms of malnutrition).

Fictional vampires are a completely differant matter:

In ancient mythology a vampire was a winged, horned, beast with leathery skin and a rather dragon-like appearance that not only drank the blood of humans and cows, but also ate their flesh as well.

As the years passed the myth evolved to say that they were not demon beasts, but rather evil men that came back to life after dieing.

In the Gothic Revival Period (Late Victorian era), everything changed with the writing of the book Dracula. However, it wouldn’t be until Bela Lugosi’s movie version of Dracula, that the general public would start thinking of vampires as demon-possessed-undeads.

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

>Vampires

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I found this question on NaNoWriMo Forums and felt I could not pass it by without throwing in my 2 cents:

[quote=Ginger Brown]Drinking blood when not a vampire. Just a good (if icky) source of iron, or would it actually do anything negative to you physically?
[/quote]

I’m wondering how you can drink blood and not be a vampire?

Vampires are a very real thing, though reality is far differant from the undead fictional ones. The dictionary (and medical doctors too) say that a vampire is anyone (or any thing –animals included) that makes a habit of drinking blood. It’s actualy one of the more common mental illnesses, and yes, the correct medical term for it is: vampirism. From what I’ve read, real vampires are anorexnics and they drink blood as a way to purge themselves, because the stomach can not tolerate blood in it. It is the constant vomitng that also causes them to be very thin, have red-tinted eyes and very pale skin (both symptoms of malnutrition).

Fictional vampires are a completely differant matter:

In ancient mythology a vampire was a winged, horned, beast with leathery skin and a rather dragon-like appearance that not only drank the blood of humans and cows, but also ate their flesh as well.

As the years passed the myth evolved to say that they were not demon beasts, but rather evil men that came back to life after dieing.

In the Gothic Revival Period (Late Victorian era), everything changed with the writing of the book Dracula. However, it wouldn’t be until Bela Lugosi’s movie version of Dracula, that the general public would start thinking of vampires as demon-possessed-undeads.

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

>Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!

Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I just found this web site: Watt-Evans’ Laws of Fantasy

I love this list they had over there. What a great idea! It makes me want to go out and make up my own list of “laws for writing __________.”

    Watt-Evans’ First Law of Fantasy: Stories are about people.

    Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy: People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

    Watt-Evans’ Third Law of Fantasy: The basic human motivations are universal.

    Watt-Evans’ Fourth Law of Fantasy: Everything other than the basic human motivations will vary, depending on the cultural setting.

    Watt-Evans’ Fifth Law of Fantasy: Magic, like everything else, has rules.

    Watt-Evans’ Sixth Law of Fantasy: If a story can be written without a fantasy element, then don’t bother with the fantasy element.

I esp. love the second law:

Watt-Evans’ Second Law of Fantasy:

    ~People are never wholly good or wholly evil, and therefore characters should never be wholly good or wholly evil.

It always bothers me when I find a character that is 100% totally pure evil. I mean, I love a bad guy, sure! But you gotta give me something to love!

When it comes to the good guy though… eeewh! 100% total goodness. Come on! No body it THAT good! I hate a goody two shoes hero that can’t do anything wrong. gag! A hero needs to have at least just a little bad in him if he’s gonna seem real to me. And besides… if he’s total good, than it won’t be believable when he starts kicking bad-boy as, right?

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

————-
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

What’s Your Story’s Controversy Score?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

[quote=Kyronae]I remember seeing this on the boards during previous years, but I can’t seem to find it this time around. So, here we go again!

On a scale of 1-10, rate your novel on its content in swearing, violence, sex and drugs (or any kind of substance abuse). Is this something you’d let your mother read? 🙂

Here’s mine:

Title: The Adrien Chronicles
Genre: Young Adult/ Urban Fantasy

Swearing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Violence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Sex 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Drugs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

[/quote]

Here’s mine:

Title: The Ruby HummingBird
Genre: Fantasy

Swearing: 0

    No swearing as of this time and not likly to be any in it at all. I do not like crude vocabulary in life or in books.

Violence: 8

    Violence is quiet high. It’s got Mayan religons complete with human sacrifices, Phookas (shapeshifting demons that eat human flesh), and a few scenes of torture. Not nessecarily gory, but there’s a lot of it and it can be disturbing at points.

Sex: 3

    Kissing “on-screen” multiple times, an attempted rape that doesn’t go beyound “kissing” before it’s prevented by a bystander, and some “off-screen” love making is hinted to but not seen “on-screen” .

Drugs: 6

    Religous leaders us frog toxins, incense, and herbs to induce trance-like states and preachings. Phooka-demon suffers from an addiction to mushrooms and frogs. Victims tortured by use of frog toxins.

Over all score:

    out of a possible 0 – 40

      15

    ————-
    Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
    Do You and I Read the Same Books?
    Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

    What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

    black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

    Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

    ————-
    Copper Cockeral
    Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
    Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
    Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
    Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
    Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

    What’s Your Story’s Controversy Score?

    black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

    [quote=Kyronae]I remember seeing this on the boards during previous years, but I can’t seem to find it this time around. So, here we go again!

    On a scale of 1-10, rate your novel on its content in swearing, violence, sex and drugs (or any kind of substance abuse). Is this something you’d let your mother read? 🙂

    Here’s mine:

    Title: The Adrien Chronicles
    Genre: Young Adult/ Urban Fantasy

    Swearing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Violence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Sex 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Drugs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    [/quote]

    Here’s mine:

    Title: The Ruby HummingBird
    Genre: Fantasy

    Swearing: 0

      No swearing as of this time and not likly to be any in it at all. I do not like crude vocabulary in life or in books.

    Violence: 8

      Violence is quiet high. It’s got Mayan religons complete with human sacrifices, Phookas (shapeshifting demons that eat human flesh), and a few scenes of torture. Not nessecarily gory, but there’s a lot of it and it can be disturbing at points.

    Sex: 3

      Kissing “on-screen” multiple times, an attempted rape that doesn’t go beyound “kissing” before it’s prevented by a bystander, and some “off-screen” love making is hinted to but not seen “on-screen” .

    Drugs: 6

      Religous leaders us frog toxins, incense, and herbs to induce trance-like states and preachings. Phooka-demon suffers from an addiction to mushrooms and frogs. Victims tortured by use of frog toxins.

    Over all score:

      out of a possible 0 – 40

        15

      ————-
      Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
      Do You and I Read the Same Books?
      Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

      What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

      black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

      Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

      ————-
      Copper Cockeral
      Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
      Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
      Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
      Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
      Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

      What’s Your Story’s Controversy Score?

      black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

      [quote=Kyronae]I remember seeing this on the boards during previous years, but I can’t seem to find it this time around. So, here we go again!

      On a scale of 1-10, rate your novel on its content in swearing, violence, sex and drugs (or any kind of substance abuse). Is this something you’d let your mother read? 🙂

      Here’s mine:

      Title: The Adrien Chronicles
      Genre: Young Adult/ Urban Fantasy

      Swearing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

      Violence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

      Sex 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

      Drugs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

      [/quote]

      Here’s mine:

      Title: The Ruby HummingBird
      Genre: Fantasy

      Swearing: 0

        No swearing as of this time and not likly to be any in it at all. I do not like crude vocabulary in life or in books.

      Violence: 8

        Violence is quiet high. It’s got Mayan religons complete with human sacrifices, Phookas (shapeshifting demons that eat human flesh), and a few scenes of torture. Not nessecarily gory, but there’s a lot of it and it can be disturbing at points.

      Sex: 3

        Kissing “on-screen” multiple times, an attempted rape that doesn’t go beyound “kissing” before it’s prevented by a bystander, and some “off-screen” love making is hinted to but not seen “on-screen” .

      Drugs: 6

        Religous leaders us frog toxins, incense, and herbs to induce trance-like states and preachings. Phooka-demon suffers from an addiction to mushrooms and frogs. Victims tortured by use of frog toxins.

      Over all score:

        out of a possible 0 – 40

          15

        ————-
        Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
        Do You and I Read the Same Books?
        Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

        What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

        black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

        Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

        ————-
        Copper Cockeral
        Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
        Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
        Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
        Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
        Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.

        What’s Your Story’s Controversy Score?

        black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

        [quote=Kyronae]I remember seeing this on the boards during previous years, but I can’t seem to find it this time around. So, here we go again!

        On a scale of 1-10, rate your novel on its content in swearing, violence, sex and drugs (or any kind of substance abuse). Is this something you’d let your mother read? 🙂

        Here’s mine:

        Title: The Adrien Chronicles
        Genre: Young Adult/ Urban Fantasy

        Swearing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

        Violence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

        Sex 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

        Drugs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

        [/quote]

        Here’s mine:

        Title: The Ruby HummingBird
        Genre: Fantasy

        Swearing: 0

          No swearing as of this time and not likly to be any in it at all. I do not like crude vocabulary in life or in books.

        Violence: 8

          Violence is quiet high. It’s got Mayan religons complete with human sacrifices, Phookas (shapeshifting demons that eat human flesh), and a few scenes of torture. Not nessecarily gory, but there’s a lot of it and it can be disturbing at points.

        Sex: 3

          Kissing “on-screen” multiple times, an attempted rape that doesn’t go beyound “kissing” before it’s prevented by a bystander, and some “off-screen” love making is hinted to but not seen “on-screen” .

        Drugs: 6

          Religous leaders us frog toxins, incense, and herbs to induce trance-like states and preachings. Phooka-demon suffers from an addiction to mushrooms and frogs. Victims tortured by use of frog toxins.

        Over all score:

          out of a possible 0 – 40

            15

          ————-
          Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
          Do You and I Read the Same Books?
          Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?

          What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

          black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

          Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

          ————-
          Copper Cockeral
          Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
          Got Writer’s BlocK? Kill It Today!
          Need A Quiet Place To Write? Find Help Here!
          Need Help Creating Characters? Check This Out!
          Want to Do a Good Deed? Save the Goldeneagle.