Category Archives: advice

How to find blogs with similar topics?

How to find blogs with similar topics?

  1. How do you find WordPress blogs that are similar to yours? I tried using the search bar on the top right but it either only gives results for my own blog or it says that there are 0 results in the archive… do you guys just web and forum surf?

My answer:


I click on the tags/categories under my posts and it opens a page with all other posts using that same tag.

I also just search using Google, by going to their search blogs section and typing in the topic phrase

I’m back again. I just checked out your blog to see what your topic was.

Okay, the last post I see, is tagged as:

young-adult, romance, realistic fiction, anna and the french kiss, stephanie perkins, france, paris

by clicking on each of these tags I found:

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/young-adult/ (many, many, many blogs listed)

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/romance/ (again, many blogs, several the same as for the last tag)

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/realistic-fiction/ (only a few blogs using this tag)

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/anna-and-the-french-kiss/ (only a few blogs, but more than the last tag)

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/stephanie-perkins/ (about the same as last 2)

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/paris/ (several blogs, but none really relevant to yours)

https://en.wordpress.com/tag/france/ (same as last tag)

Suggested tags for you to add to this post (to generate more readers):

books, book review, YA fiction

From a quick look at your blog, it seems to focus mostly on book reviews, so you should be using the phrase-tag “book review” in almost every post, but I do not see you using it in ANY post at all, and yet all but 3 of your front page posts should have this tag in them.

You do have very topic specific tags, which match well with each book, this is very good (most book review blogs simply add the tag “book review” and NOTHING else!) You want to try to have a mix of common high traffic tags used by a lot of other bloggers (such as “book review”) as well as very niche topic tags, not commonly used by other bloggers (such as “fluid writing”, a phrase you used in your review). This gives you a wider range of readers.

As a general rule it is best to err on the side of “too many” tags rather than “not enough” tags. The more tags you have the more search results your blog will come up in and the more readers you will get. On my own blog, I try to have no less than 10 tags per post and if I can think of that many, it’s not unusual for me to put as many as 30 tags on a single post. The more the merrier when it comes to tags, but just be sure they are on topic for your post.

But anyways, yeah, tag your posts, than click on those tags, and you’ll see who else is using the same topics as you.

Oh, and I tried using the search bar at the top of the page – it appears that it ONLY searches within whatever blog you are viewing when you typed your search terms. I’m not sure if there is some way to change that in the settings or not.

Hope I explained all this okay and hope it helps you out. Good luck with you blogging!

~EK

Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

>Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

My responce to Buildings/Landmarks that don’t actually exist…

[quote=Strongbear;1959304]Suppose you’re writing a story which is set in the real world as opposed to some imaginary sci-fi realm. Now suppose you wanted to put a completely invented, currently non-existent building or landmark right smack in the middle of a particular location (eg if you stuck a 14th century historic-looking building somewhere in New York or Paris). How would you as either the reader or another writer respond to this? Would you simply accept this as believable since you would know that this building doesn’t exist in real life? And would it raise questions as to where someone either got planning permission or the necessary funds to suddenly erect it there (if you used the argument that it was a newly constructed landmark/building built in a 14th century style)?

And would you as a writer be deterred from creating such an imaginary place because of real-world constraints or would you still go for it?

Thoughts?[/quote]

been there, done that.

Old Orchard Beach, Maine is my very real hometown, The Twighlight Manor is my very fictional vampire infested medival castle built smack dab in the middle of it. I’ve never had any complaints with the series at all. Of course, I also moved Bar Harbor’s very real Thunder Hole to Old Orchard Beach, and no one has really noticed that it should not be where I put it either.

I guess, it’s because I know ever inch of Old Orchard, that I can write about it so well, but it’s a very small town, so most folks don’t know if there really is a Twighlight Manor in the town or not, and most folks know the Thunder Hole is in Maine, but unless they live here, most can’t tell you which town it’s in, so they don’t notice that I moved it some 300 miles away.

And the moral is? If you know the area well enough to write about it like you are the town historian, than folks are not going to question all the little fictional details you add in, at least not until they show up on your front door step and ask you for directions to your fictional landmark, that is. It’s the mark of a good writer when you can blend fiction with reality and your readers can’t tell the differance.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Average Amount of Hours it Takes to Write an Article

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I found this question on Absolute Write:

[quote=littlebee;1959632]Hi There!

I’m hoping someone may have some feedback on the average length of time (hrs.) it takes a writer to write a non-fiction article (500 words) that requires research. For instance, I have an assignment to write a short article on a historical figure. Other than the person’s name which I recognize, in order to write a piece on this person, I must read and understand this person’s life.

I’m wondering if it’s better to present a flat-rate vs. a per hour rate to a client. And as a general rule, does one just double the amt. if it’s a 1,000 word article instead (and the increments thereof if one does quote a hourly rate?). Thanks for any feedback and have a super weekend ahead! :-)[/quote]

Time for me varies on the article topic and how much I know before hand and how much research I end up doing.

Ok, 500 words, for a historical figure that I’m well aquanted with (have already studied and researched), would take me about 15 mins to a half hour to write.

But, 500 words for a historical figure, whom I’ve merely heard of, would take me about a week, because I would first Goole to see what other writers are already writing about him; than I’d head to the library and take out as many biographies as possible, usualy 2 adult novel-type bios and 5 or 6 children’s DK or picture book type bios. It would take be a week (maybe two if I found a lot of them) to read those books. After I finished my research, however, again, a 500 word article would take only 15 to 30 mins to write.

Also, I have only heard of being paid on a per word or per assignment basis. Per hour pay is a nice dream, but in the real world, no one wants to pay a writer more than a couple of pennies per word, so pay per hour is out of the question in their minds… I bet they’d demand pay per hour if they were the writer though!

EDIT: Just reading the comments now…

[quote=Billingsgate;1962628]

The trick in this case is to do the proper research, however long it takes to get the facts straight, write the 500 word article and get paid for it, then use the research to write even more articles, each targeted to different publications, focusing on different angles.

….

So use any commissioned work as a springboard for other work. It’s more inspiring to do the research when you know you’ll be getting paid for at least the first article.[/quote]

I totally agree with this. I do the same thing. I often write 10 or 15 articles all at once. Say for the historical figure already mentioned: I’d write the 500 word article, requested, than I write one on his childhood, another on some important event he was involved in, etc. etc.

Usualy the extra articles end up sitting on my harddrive for months and months before I find a use for them, but I almost always find a use for them in the end, so it’s good to write them while the info is fresh in your head, that way you’ll have them on hand in the furtue.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

>Average Amount of Hours it Takes to Write an Article

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I found this question on Absolute Write:

[quote=littlebee;1959632]Hi There!

I’m hoping someone may have some feedback on the average length of time (hrs.) it takes a writer to write a non-fiction article (500 words) that requires research. For instance, I have an assignment to write a short article on a historical figure. Other than the person’s name which I recognize, in order to write a piece on this person, I must read and understand this person’s life.

I’m wondering if it’s better to present a flat-rate vs. a per hour rate to a client. And as a general rule, does one just double the amt. if it’s a 1,000 word article instead (and the increments thereof if one does quote a hourly rate?). Thanks for any feedback and have a super weekend ahead! :-)[/quote]

Time for me varies on the article topic and how much I know before hand and how much research I end up doing.

Ok, 500 words, for a historical figure that I’m well aquanted with (have already studied and researched), would take me about 15 mins to a half hour to write.

But, 500 words for a historical figure, whom I’ve merely heard of, would take me about a week, because I would first Goole to see what other writers are already writing about him; than I’d head to the library and take out as many biographies as possible, usualy 2 adult novel-type bios and 5 or 6 children’s DK or picture book type bios. It would take be a week (maybe two if I found a lot of them) to read those books. After I finished my research, however, again, a 500 word article would take only 15 to 30 mins to write.

Also, I have only heard of being paid on a per word or per assignment basis. Per hour pay is a nice dream, but in the real world, no one wants to pay a writer more than a couple of pennies per word, so pay per hour is out of the question in their minds… I bet they’d demand pay per hour if they were the writer though!

EDIT: Just reading the comments now…

[quote=Billingsgate;1962628]

The trick in this case is to do the proper research, however long it takes to get the facts straight, write the 500 word article and get paid for it, then use the research to write even more articles, each targeted to different publications, focusing on different angles.

….

So use any commissioned work as a springboard for other work. It’s more inspiring to do the research when you know you’ll be getting paid for at least the first article.[/quote]

I totally agree with this. I do the same thing. I often write 10 or 15 articles all at once. Say for the historical figure already mentioned: I’d write the 500 word article, requested, than I write one on his childhood, another on some important event he was involved in, etc. etc.

Usualy the extra articles end up sitting on my harddrive for months and months before I find a use for them, but I almost always find a use for them in the end, so it’s good to write them while the info is fresh in your head, that way you’ll have them on hand in the furtue.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Average Amount of Hours it Takes to Write an Article

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

I found this question on Absolute Write:

[quote=littlebee;1959632]Hi There!

I’m hoping someone may have some feedback on the average length of time (hrs.) it takes a writer to write a non-fiction article (500 words) that requires research. For instance, I have an assignment to write a short article on a historical figure. Other than the person’s name which I recognize, in order to write a piece on this person, I must read and understand this person’s life.

I’m wondering if it’s better to present a flat-rate vs. a per hour rate to a client. And as a general rule, does one just double the amt. if it’s a 1,000 word article instead (and the increments thereof if one does quote a hourly rate?). Thanks for any feedback and have a super weekend ahead! :-)[/quote]

Time for me varies on the article topic and how much I know before hand and how much research I end up doing.

Ok, 500 words, for a historical figure that I’m well aquanted with (have already studied and researched), would take me about 15 mins to a half hour to write.

But, 500 words for a historical figure, whom I’ve merely heard of, would take me about a week, because I would first Goole to see what other writers are already writing about him; than I’d head to the library and take out as many biographies as possible, usualy 2 adult novel-type bios and 5 or 6 children’s DK or picture book type bios. It would take be a week (maybe two if I found a lot of them) to read those books. After I finished my research, however, again, a 500 word article would take only 15 to 30 mins to write.

Also, I have only heard of being paid on a per word or per assignment basis. Per hour pay is a nice dream, but in the real world, no one wants to pay a writer more than a couple of pennies per word, so pay per hour is out of the question in their minds… I bet they’d demand pay per hour if they were the writer though!

EDIT: Just reading the comments now…

[quote=Billingsgate;1962628]

The trick in this case is to do the proper research, however long it takes to get the facts straight, write the 500 word article and get paid for it, then use the research to write even more articles, each targeted to different publications, focusing on different angles.

….

So use any commissioned work as a springboard for other work. It’s more inspiring to do the research when you know you’ll be getting paid for at least the first article.[/quote]

I totally agree with this. I do the same thing. I often write 10 or 15 articles all at once. Say for the historical figure already mentioned: I’d write the 500 word article, requested, than I write one on his childhood, another on some important event he was involved in, etc. etc.

Usualy the extra articles end up sitting on my harddrive for months and months before I find a use for them, but I almost always find a use for them in the end, so it’s good to write them while the info is fresh in your head, that way you’ll have them on hand in the furtue.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Join Associated Content

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer?

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer? I feel that it is a matter of how well you feel you can do each of those jobs on your own.

Can you market your MS on your own? Do you feel comfortable sending out querry letters and such? How good are you at stiking up a contract with a publisher? Can you find the right editor to edit your MS? If you can answer yes to those questions, than you may no have any need for an agent.

How well do you know the English language? What are your grammar, pubctuation, and spelling skills? If you know the language well enough, than you may not need a private editor.

How well do you know the laws? Do you know the differance between copyrights, serial rights, movie rights, international rights, first print rights, reprint rights, work for hire, consignment pay, trademark laws, registraition laws, liability notification requirements, disclaimer laws, IRS laws, local business permit laws (some towns require a writer to have a business permit), income tax laws, and publisher rights? Though most writers well need a contract lawyer, if you know the ins and outs of the law, than you may be one of the few writers who can go it on your own.

No one can tell you to hire any of these people and no one can tell you that you do not need them. It is up to you to look at the advantages of hiring each, alongside the advantages of going it on your own. There is no right or wrong here, only what you feel is in your own best interests.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

>Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer?

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer? I feel that it is a matter of how well you feel you can do each of those jobs on your own.

Can you market your MS on your own? Do you feel comfortable sending out querry letters and such? How good are you at stiking up a contract with a publisher? Can you find the right editor to edit your MS? If you can answer yes to those questions, than you may no have any need for an agent.

How well do you know the English language? What are your grammar, pubctuation, and spelling skills? If you know the language well enough, than you may not need a private editor.

How well do you know the laws? Do you know the differance between copyrights, serial rights, movie rights, international rights, first print rights, reprint rights, work for hire, consignment pay, trademark laws, registraition laws, liability notification requirements, disclaimer laws, IRS laws, local business permit laws (some towns require a writer to have a business permit), income tax laws, and publisher rights? Though most writers well need a contract lawyer, if you know the ins and outs of the law, than you may be one of the few writers who can go it on your own.

No one can tell you to hire any of these people and no one can tell you that you do not need them. It is up to you to look at the advantages of hiring each, alongside the advantages of going it on your own. There is no right or wrong here, only what you feel is in your own best interests.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer?

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer? I feel that it is a matter of how well you feel you can do each of those jobs on your own.

Can you market your MS on your own? Do you feel comfortable sending out querry letters and such? How good are you at stiking up a contract with a publisher? Can you find the right editor to edit your MS? If you can answer yes to those questions, than you may no have any need for an agent.

How well do you know the English language? What are your grammar, pubctuation, and spelling skills? If you know the language well enough, than you may not need a private editor.

How well do you know the laws? Do you know the differance between copyrights, serial rights, movie rights, international rights, first print rights, reprint rights, work for hire, consignment pay, trademark laws, registraition laws, liability notification requirements, disclaimer laws, IRS laws, local business permit laws (some towns require a writer to have a business permit), income tax laws, and publisher rights? Though most writers well need a contract lawyer, if you know the ins and outs of the law, than you may be one of the few writers who can go it on your own.

No one can tell you to hire any of these people and no one can tell you that you do not need them. It is up to you to look at the advantages of hiring each, alongside the advantages of going it on your own. There is no right or wrong here, only what you feel is in your own best interests.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer?

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer? I feel that it is a matter of how well you feel you can do each of those jobs on your own.

Can you market your MS on your own? Do you feel comfortable sending out querry letters and such? How good are you at stiking up a contract with a publisher? Can you find the right editor to edit your MS? If you can answer yes to those questions, than you may no have any need for an agent.

How well do you know the English language? What are your grammar, pubctuation, and spelling skills? If you know the language well enough, than you may not need a private editor.

How well do you know the laws? Do you know the differance between copyrights, serial rights, movie rights, international rights, first print rights, reprint rights, work for hire, consignment pay, trademark laws, registraition laws, liability notification requirements, disclaimer laws, IRS laws, local business permit laws (some towns require a writer to have a business permit), income tax laws, and publisher rights? Though most writers well need a contract lawyer, if you know the ins and outs of the law, than you may be one of the few writers who can go it on your own.

No one can tell you to hire any of these people and no one can tell you that you do not need them. It is up to you to look at the advantages of hiring each, alongside the advantages of going it on your own. There is no right or wrong here, only what you feel is in your own best interests.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Should you hire an agent, a private editor, and-or a contract lawyer? I feel that it is a matter of how well you feel you can do each of those jobs on your own.

Can you market your MS on your own? Do you feel comfortable sending out querry letters and such? How good are you at stiking up a contract with a publisher? Can you find the right editor to edit your MS? If you can answer yes to those questions, than you may no have any need for an agent.

How well do you know the English language? What are your grammar, pubctuation, and spelling skills? If you know the language well enough, than you may not need a private editor.

How well do you know the laws? Do you know the differance between copyrights, serial rights, movie rights, international rights, first print rights, reprint rights, work for hire, consignment pay, trademark laws, registraition laws, liability notification requirements, disclaimer laws, IRS laws, local business permit laws (some towns require a writer to have a business permit), income tax laws, and publisher rights? Though most writers well need a contract lawyer, if you know the ins and outs of the law, than you may be one of the few writers who can go it on your own.

No one can tell you to hire any of these people and no one can tell you that you do not need them. It is up to you to look at the advantages of hiring each, alongside the advantages of going it on your own. There is no right or wrong here, only what you feel is in your own best interests.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

How Does One Start a Small Theater Group?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Here is a copy of a thread I started HERE.

On one of the older threads, I read this post:

[quote=Mandy-Jane;1117321]I’m involved in local theatre. My husband and I run our own theatre group, and we have about 20 members. He produces and acts, and this year he’s directing the show that we’re doing. My involvement tends to be more “administrative” I guess, due to the fact that I’m generally housebound with two young kids. I write the monthly newsletter that goes out to the group, and I help to organise advertising and promotion of our shows. At the moment I’m working on a program for our upcoming production. We also run a theatre festival every year, full of performances and workshops in all aspects of theatre. This year we’re running a writer’s competition for local writers to submit one act plays. The winner’s play will be workshopped and given a public reading. Very exciting (except that I can’t enter of course!) I agree with you Bison, and I did intend to respond, but of course I never did get around to it until now! Local theatre is very exciting, and almost compulsory for people like us wanting to improve our playwriting skills.[/quote]

I was in my first play at age 5. From that point on it was love at first sight. I did about a dozen or so more plays, and convinced my parents to take me to several live plays, a ballet, 2 Ice Capades shows, and an opera. I watched Great Preferomances on PBS. I siged up for ballet lessons and had a frilly pink tutu, but than my parants couldn’t afford the lessons, so I never became a dancer. All this happened before I was 12 years old.

By the time I was 16 I realized that my passion for live theater, was to create rather than perform, as I did more play writing and costume designing (and sewing) than I did actual acting. The result was I enrolled in a 2 year fasion design course.

As an adult I ended up become an saleswoman and an author, but theater still lurks in the back of my head, and I continue to write ballets and design costumes.

Than about 3 years ago, I wrote up a plan to start my own theater-dance group, and got stuck, when it hit me that, not one single person I knew had any interest in this idea at all.

Well, I wondering: How do you go about starting a theater group? or rather:

How do you go about starting a theater groupo, when you are a writer who writes ballet/dance-plays, but you have no friends or family interested in theater at all?

I do not know anyone who wants to be part of a stage group! How do I go about finding others to help out? I’d like to start a group where I would be the playwrite-stage director-costume designer. That means I’d need to find a chorographer, music writer, accountant/manager, a tailor, set makers, and of course the actor-dancers, plus anyone else I missed mentioning. AWK! How do I find those? Am I thinking “too big”?

For those of you who started or are in some way involved in small theater groups, how did you get started? How did you find others to join you? What advice can you give to someone just starting out?

Thanks!

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

>How Does One Start a Small Theater Group?

>
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Here is a copy of a thread I started HERE.

On one of the older threads, I read this post:

[quote=Mandy-Jane;1117321]I’m involved in local theatre. My husband and I run our own theatre group, and we have about 20 members. He produces and acts, and this year he’s directing the show that we’re doing. My involvement tends to be more “administrative” I guess, due to the fact that I’m generally housebound with two young kids. I write the monthly newsletter that goes out to the group, and I help to organise advertising and promotion of our shows. At the moment I’m working on a program for our upcoming production. We also run a theatre festival every year, full of performances and workshops in all aspects of theatre. This year we’re running a writer’s competition for local writers to submit one act plays. The winner’s play will be workshopped and given a public reading. Very exciting (except that I can’t enter of course!) I agree with you Bison, and I did intend to respond, but of course I never did get around to it until now! Local theatre is very exciting, and almost compulsory for people like us wanting to improve our playwriting skills.[/quote]

I was in my first play at age 5. From that point on it was love at first sight. I did about a dozen or so more plays, and convinced my parents to take me to several live plays, a ballet, 2 Ice Capades shows, and an opera. I watched Great Preferomances on PBS. I siged up for ballet lessons and had a frilly pink tutu, but than my parants couldn’t afford the lessons, so I never became a dancer. All this happened before I was 12 years old.

By the time I was 16 I realized that my passion for live theater, was to create rather than perform, as I did more play writing and costume designing (and sewing) than I did actual acting. The result was I enrolled in a 2 year fasion design course.

As an adult I ended up become an saleswoman and an author, but theater still lurks in the back of my head, and I continue to write ballets and design costumes.

Than about 3 years ago, I wrote up a plan to start my own theater-dance group, and got stuck, when it hit me that, not one single person I knew had any interest in this idea at all.

Well, I wondering: How do you go about starting a theater group? or rather:

How do you go about starting a theater groupo, when you are a writer who writes ballet/dance-plays, but you have no friends or family interested in theater at all?

I do not know anyone who wants to be part of a stage group! How do I go about finding others to help out? I’d like to start a group where I would be the playwrite-stage director-costume designer. That means I’d need to find a chorographer, music writer, accountant/manager, a tailor, set makers, and of course the actor-dancers, plus anyone else I missed mentioning. AWK! How do I find those? Am I thinking “too big”?

For those of you who started or are in some way involved in small theater groups, how did you get started? How did you find others to join you? What advice can you give to someone just starting out?

Thanks!

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

How Does One Start a Small Theater Group?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Here is a copy of a thread I started HERE.

On one of the older threads, I read this post:

[quote=Mandy-Jane;1117321]I’m involved in local theatre. My husband and I run our own theatre group, and we have about 20 members. He produces and acts, and this year he’s directing the show that we’re doing. My involvement tends to be more “administrative” I guess, due to the fact that I’m generally housebound with two young kids. I write the monthly newsletter that goes out to the group, and I help to organise advertising and promotion of our shows. At the moment I’m working on a program for our upcoming production. We also run a theatre festival every year, full of performances and workshops in all aspects of theatre. This year we’re running a writer’s competition for local writers to submit one act plays. The winner’s play will be workshopped and given a public reading. Very exciting (except that I can’t enter of course!) I agree with you Bison, and I did intend to respond, but of course I never did get around to it until now! Local theatre is very exciting, and almost compulsory for people like us wanting to improve our playwriting skills.[/quote]

I was in my first play at age 5. From that point on it was love at first sight. I did about a dozen or so more plays, and convinced my parents to take me to several live plays, a ballet, 2 Ice Capades shows, and an opera. I watched Great Preferomances on PBS. I siged up for ballet lessons and had a frilly pink tutu, but than my parants couldn’t afford the lessons, so I never became a dancer. All this happened before I was 12 years old.

By the time I was 16 I realized that my passion for live theater, was to create rather than perform, as I did more play writing and costume designing (and sewing) than I did actual acting. The result was I enrolled in a 2 year fasion design course.

As an adult I ended up become an saleswoman and an author, but theater still lurks in the back of my head, and I continue to write ballets and design costumes.

Than about 3 years ago, I wrote up a plan to start my own theater-dance group, and got stuck, when it hit me that, not one single person I knew had any interest in this idea at all.

Well, I wondering: How do you go about starting a theater group? or rather:

How do you go about starting a theater groupo, when you are a writer who writes ballet/dance-plays, but you have no friends or family interested in theater at all?

I do not know anyone who wants to be part of a stage group! How do I go about finding others to help out? I’d like to start a group where I would be the playwrite-stage director-costume designer. That means I’d need to find a chorographer, music writer, accountant/manager, a tailor, set makers, and of course the actor-dancers, plus anyone else I missed mentioning. AWK! How do I find those? Am I thinking “too big”?

For those of you who started or are in some way involved in small theater groups, how did you get started? How did you find others to join you? What advice can you give to someone just starting out?

Thanks!

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

How Does One Start a Small Theater Group?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Here is a copy of a thread I started HERE.

On one of the older threads, I read this post:

[quote=Mandy-Jane;1117321]I’m involved in local theatre. My husband and I run our own theatre group, and we have about 20 members. He produces and acts, and this year he’s directing the show that we’re doing. My involvement tends to be more “administrative” I guess, due to the fact that I’m generally housebound with two young kids. I write the monthly newsletter that goes out to the group, and I help to organise advertising and promotion of our shows. At the moment I’m working on a program for our upcoming production. We also run a theatre festival every year, full of performances and workshops in all aspects of theatre. This year we’re running a writer’s competition for local writers to submit one act plays. The winner’s play will be workshopped and given a public reading. Very exciting (except that I can’t enter of course!) I agree with you Bison, and I did intend to respond, but of course I never did get around to it until now! Local theatre is very exciting, and almost compulsory for people like us wanting to improve our playwriting skills.[/quote]

I was in my first play at age 5. From that point on it was love at first sight. I did about a dozen or so more plays, and convinced my parents to take me to several live plays, a ballet, 2 Ice Capades shows, and an opera. I watched Great Preferomances on PBS. I siged up for ballet lessons and had a frilly pink tutu, but than my parants couldn’t afford the lessons, so I never became a dancer. All this happened before I was 12 years old.

By the time I was 16 I realized that my passion for live theater, was to create rather than perform, as I did more play writing and costume designing (and sewing) than I did actual acting. The result was I enrolled in a 2 year fasion design course.

As an adult I ended up become an saleswoman and an author, but theater still lurks in the back of my head, and I continue to write ballets and design costumes.

Than about 3 years ago, I wrote up a plan to start my own theater-dance group, and got stuck, when it hit me that, not one single person I knew had any interest in this idea at all.

Well, I wondering: How do you go about starting a theater group? or rather:

How do you go about starting a theater groupo, when you are a writer who writes ballet/dance-plays, but you have no friends or family interested in theater at all?

I do not know anyone who wants to be part of a stage group! How do I go about finding others to help out? I’d like to start a group where I would be the playwrite-stage director-costume designer. That means I’d need to find a chorographer, music writer, accountant/manager, a tailor, set makers, and of course the actor-dancers, plus anyone else I missed mentioning. AWK! How do I find those? Am I thinking “too big”?

For those of you who started or are in some way involved in small theater groups, how did you get started? How did you find others to join you? What advice can you give to someone just starting out?

Thanks!

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Can a Book be Both Traditionaly Published AND POD Self-Published?

https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=1568601425&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

In responce the THIS THREAD on Absolute Write Water Cooler,

[quote=Heath;1943105]Is there a downside to doing POD while at the same time courting an agent?

I have a number of people wanting to read my book “when it’s published,” and I thought, why not just publish it by POD and keep looking for an agent. It would be out there, I could test the waters to some degree, and still proceed as I’m going.

Is there a downside to that strategy? I realize the book is already “out there,” but I wouldn’t be mentioning it to the agent unless it came up, and I would pull it off POD once I get represented.[/quote]

I wrote this:

First printing rights is for books

First serial rights is for magazines

It’s basicly the same for both and I’ve heard publishers cross over and use just “first rights” for both books and magazines, as is been done here on this thread.

If you self-publish via POD than you have printed up this book’s “first edition” and when you finally find an agent and the agent finally finds you a traditional publisher, you will only be able to offer “second edition” (aslo known as “reprint”) rights. As a general rule, unless the book as sold over 10,000 copies a publisher will not buy second rights.

The average book sells just 500 copies. (at the average 4% royalty of wholesale price that averages out to : $1,000 – $1,500 total pay for you the author for the entire life of the book)

Rarely does a first book make over $2,000 for it’s author.

The average life of a book is 3 months. (meaning the publisher pulls it off the shelves and stops selling it just 3 months after it went to print)

In order to keep you book in print past those 3 months it must become a “bestseller”.

In order to become a bestseller, you must sell an astronomical total of 10,000 copies in that 3 months time.
https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=0471799521&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
Most publishers DO NOT promote your book. The books that become bestsellers, had an author that put a lot of their time and money into marketing the book themselves. Most books, regardless of publisher, sell only as many books as THE AUTHOR promotes. This is true wither you publish via Scholastic Books (with it’s 100 new titles each month, including Harry Potter) or Twighlight Manor Press and it’s 10 books every other year.

Basicly all a book publisher does is list your book in their catalog and hope that book stores choose to stock it on their shelves.

Books (such as Harry Potter — traditional published— and Eragon —self-published—) get famous, not from the publisher’s promotion, but from THE AUTHOR’S having gone out there and told everyone under the sun how great their book was and paying large amounts of their own money (we are talking hundreds of thousands of dollars of the author’s private pocket money, mony they already had BEFORE book’s release, in the case of such authors J.K.Rowlings, Palini, Steven King, etc.) for advertising in such newspapers as The New York Times. Eragon, a self published book, became an over night best seller because of a single one day full page ad in The New York Times, that cost Palini’s parents over $14,000! Within a few weeks he had big name book publishers begging to sell the reprint editions.

So you see. What you the author are willing (or can afford) to pay for a marketing campaign, is going to determin how many book you sell, not who you choose for a publisher. Keep in mind that when you see ads for book, either in newspapers or on tv, those ads were paid for by the author him-herself, NOT the publisher.

Most writers, once hit in the face with the harsh reality of these facts, never attempt to write a second book, which is why there are so many one book authors out there.

On the other hand a self-published POD book never goes out of print and you earn 100% of the profits off the retail price.

If you are willing to promote and market your book hard enough, you’ll make more money in the long run by self-publishing, because you can keep selling your book for the next 10 or 20 years.
https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=093849743X&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

If you want to do as you suggest and do both POD self publish AND traditional publish, than you MUST do it the other way around. Traditional publish first and POD later.

Your best bet is to hold off on the POD right now, and focus on finding that agent. Let the traditional publisher buy the first edition rights, get paid your advance and your royalties, let them sell the first edition, than next year after the book has gone out of print, you bring it back out as a POD reprint and continue to sell it for the rest of your life. (A lot of authors do this and after writing 4 or 5 books, they have a pretty steady monthly income coming in.)

I hope this helps.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=1568601468&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

>Can a Book be Both Traditionaly Published AND POD Self-Published?

>https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=1568601425&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

In responce the THIS THREAD on Absolute Write Water Cooler,

[quote=Heath;1943105]Is there a downside to doing POD while at the same time courting an agent?

I have a number of people wanting to read my book “when it’s published,” and I thought, why not just publish it by POD and keep looking for an agent. It would be out there, I could test the waters to some degree, and still proceed as I’m going.

Is there a downside to that strategy? I realize the book is already “out there,” but I wouldn’t be mentioning it to the agent unless it came up, and I would pull it off POD once I get represented.[/quote]

I wrote this:

First printing rights is for books

First serial rights is for magazines

It’s basicly the same for both and I’ve heard publishers cross over and use just “first rights” for both books and magazines, as is been done here on this thread.

If you self-publish via POD than you have printed up this book’s “first edition” and when you finally find an agent and the agent finally finds you a traditional publisher, you will only be able to offer “second edition” (aslo known as “reprint”) rights. As a general rule, unless the book as sold over 10,000 copies a publisher will not buy second rights.

The average book sells just 500 copies. (at the average 4% royalty of wholesale price that averages out to : $1,000 – $1,500 total pay for you the author for the entire life of the book)

Rarely does a first book make over $2,000 for it’s author.

The average life of a book is 3 months. (meaning the publisher pulls it off the shelves and stops selling it just 3 months after it went to print)

In order to keep you book in print past those 3 months it must become a “bestseller”.

In order to become a bestseller, you must sell an astronomical total of 10,000 copies in that 3 months time.
https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=0471799521&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
Most publishers DO NOT promote your book. The books that become bestsellers, had an author that put a lot of their time and money into marketing the book themselves. Most books, regardless of publisher, sell only as many books as THE AUTHOR promotes. This is true wither you publish via Scholastic Books (with it’s 100 new titles each month, including Harry Potter) or Twighlight Manor Press and it’s 10 books every other year.

Basicly all a book publisher does is list your book in their catalog and hope that book stores choose to stock it on their shelves.

Books (such as Harry Potter — traditional published— and Eragon —self-published—) get famous, not from the publisher’s promotion, but from THE AUTHOR’S having gone out there and told everyone under the sun how great their book was and paying large amounts of their own money (we are talking hundreds of thousands of dollars of the author’s private pocket money, mony they already had BEFORE book’s release, in the case of such authors J.K.Rowlings, Palini, Steven King, etc.) for advertising in such newspapers as The New York Times. Eragon, a self published book, became an over night best seller because of a single one day full page ad in The New York Times, that cost Palini’s parents over $14,000! Within a few weeks he had big name book publishers begging to sell the reprint editions.

So you see. What you the author are willing (or can afford) to pay for a marketing campaign, is going to determin how many book you sell, not who you choose for a publisher. Keep in mind that when you see ads for book, either in newspapers or on tv, those ads were paid for by the author him-herself, NOT the publisher.

Most writers, once hit in the face with the harsh reality of these facts, never attempt to write a second book, which is why there are so many one book authors out there.

On the other hand a self-published POD book never goes out of print and you earn 100% of the profits off the retail price.

If you are willing to promote and market your book hard enough, you’ll make more money in the long run by self-publishing, because you can keep selling your book for the next 10 or 20 years.
https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=093849743X&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

If you want to do as you suggest and do both POD self publish AND traditional publish, than you MUST do it the other way around. Traditional publish first and POD later.

Your best bet is to hold off on the POD right now, and focus on finding that agent. Let the traditional publisher buy the first edition rights, get paid your advance and your royalties, let them sell the first edition, than next year after the book has gone out of print, you bring it back out as a POD reprint and continue to sell it for the rest of your life. (A lot of authors do this and after writing 4 or 5 books, they have a pretty steady monthly income coming in.)

I hope this helps.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

https://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=spacedock13-20&o=1&p=8&l=bpl&asins=1568601468&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Can a Book be Both Traditionaly Published AND POD Self-Published?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

In responce the THIS THREAD on Absolute Write Water Cooler,

[quote=Heath;1943105]Is there a downside to doing POD while at the same time courting an agent?

I have a number of people wanting to read my book “when it’s published,” and I thought, why not just publish it by POD and keep looking for an agent. It would be out there, I could test the waters to some degree, and still proceed as I’m going.

Is there a downside to that strategy? I realize the book is already “out there,” but I wouldn’t be mentioning it to the agent unless it came up, and I would pull it off POD once I get represented.[/quote]

I wrote this:

First printing rights is for books

First serial rights is for magazines

It’s basicly the same for both and I’ve heard publishers cross over and use just “first rights” for both books and magazines, as is been done here on this thread.

If you self-publish via POD than you have printed up this book’s “first edition” and when you finally find an agent and the agent finally finds you a traditional publisher, you will only be able to offer “second edition” (aslo known as “reprint”) rights. As a general rule, unless the book as sold over 10,000 copies a publisher will not buy second rights.

The average book sells just 500 copies. (at the average 4% royalty of wholesale price that averages out to : $1,000 – $1,500 total pay for you the author for the entire life of the book)

Rarely does a first book make over $2,000 for it’s author.

The average life of a book is 3 months. (meaning the publisher pulls it off the shelves and stops selling it just 3 months after it went to print)

In order to keep you book in print past those 3 months it must become a “bestseller”.

In order to become a bestseller, you must sell an astronomical total of 10,000 copies in that 3 months time.

Most publishers DO NOT promote your book. The books that become bestsellers, had an author that put a lot of their time and money into marketing the book themselves. Most books, regardless of publisher, sell only as many books as THE AUTHOR promotes. This is true wither you publish via Scholastic Books (with it’s 100 new titles each month, including Harry Potter) or Twighlight Manor Press and it’s 10 books every other year.

Basicly all a book publisher does is list your book in their catalog and hope that book stores choose to stock it on their shelves.

Books (such as Harry Potter — traditional published— and Eragon —self-published—) get famous, not from the publisher’s promotion, but from THE AUTHOR’S having gone out there and told everyone under the sun how great their book was and paying large amounts of their own money (we are talking hundreds of thousands of dollars of the author’s private pocket money, mony they already had BEFORE book’s release, in the case of such authors J.K.Rowlings, Palini, Steven King, etc.) for advertising in such newspapers as The New York Times. Eragon, a self published book, became an over night best seller because of a single one day full page ad in The New York Times, that cost Palini’s parents over $14,000! Within a few weeks he had big name book publishers begging to sell the reprint editions.

So you see. What you the author are willing (or can afford) to pay for a marketing campaign, is going to determin how many book you sell, not who you choose for a publisher. Keep in mind that when you see ads for book, either in newspapers or on tv, those ads were paid for by the author him-herself, NOT the publisher.

Most writers, once hit in the face with the harsh reality of these facts, never attempt to write a second book, which is why there are so many one book authors out there.

On the other hand a self-published POD book never goes out of print and you earn 100% of the profits off the retail price.

If you are willing to promote and market your book hard enough, you’ll make more money in the long run by self-publishing, because you can keep selling your book for the next 10 or 20 years.

If you want to do as you suggest and do both POD self publish AND traditional publish, than you MUST do it the other way around. Traditional publish first and POD later.

Your best bet is to hold off on the POD right now, and focus on finding that agent. Let the traditional publisher buy the first edition rights, get paid your advance and your royalties, let them sell the first edition, than next year after the book has gone out of print, you bring it back out as a POD reprint and continue to sell it for the rest of your life. (A lot of authors do this and after writing 4 or 5 books, they have a pretty steady monthly income coming in.)

I hope this helps.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Can a Book be Both Traditionaly Published AND POD Self-Published?

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

In responce the THIS THREAD on Absolute Write Water Cooler,

[quote=Heath;1943105]Is there a downside to doing POD while at the same time courting an agent?

I have a number of people wanting to read my book “when it’s published,” and I thought, why not just publish it by POD and keep looking for an agent. It would be out there, I could test the waters to some degree, and still proceed as I’m going.

Is there a downside to that strategy? I realize the book is already “out there,” but I wouldn’t be mentioning it to the agent unless it came up, and I would pull it off POD once I get represented.[/quote]

I wrote this:

First printing rights is for books

First serial rights is for magazines

It’s basicly the same for both and I’ve heard publishers cross over and use just “first rights” for both books and magazines, as is been done here on this thread.

If you self-publish via POD than you have printed up this book’s “first edition” and when you finally find an agent and the agent finally finds you a traditional publisher, you will only be able to offer “second edition” (aslo known as “reprint”) rights. As a general rule, unless the book as sold over 10,000 copies a publisher will not buy second rights.

The average book sells just 500 copies. (at the average 4% royalty of wholesale price that averages out to : $1,000 – $1,500 total pay for you the author for the entire life of the book)

Rarely does a first book make over $2,000 for it’s author.

The average life of a book is 3 months. (meaning the publisher pulls it off the shelves and stops selling it just 3 months after it went to print)

In order to keep you book in print past those 3 months it must become a “bestseller”.

In order to become a bestseller, you must sell an astronomical total of 10,000 copies in that 3 months time.

Most publishers DO NOT promote your book. The books that become bestsellers, had an author that put a lot of their time and money into marketing the book themselves. Most books, regardless of publisher, sell only as many books as THE AUTHOR promotes. This is true wither you publish via Scholastic Books (with it’s 100 new titles each month, including Harry Potter) or Twighlight Manor Press and it’s 10 books every other year.

Basicly all a book publisher does is list your book in their catalog and hope that book stores choose to stock it on their shelves.

Books (such as Harry Potter — traditional published— and Eragon —self-published—) get famous, not from the publisher’s promotion, but from THE AUTHOR’S having gone out there and told everyone under the sun how great their book was and paying large amounts of their own money (we are talking hundreds of thousands of dollars of the author’s private pocket money, mony they already had BEFORE book’s release, in the case of such authors J.K.Rowlings, Palini, Steven King, etc.) for advertising in such newspapers as The New York Times. Eragon, a self published book, became an over night best seller because of a single one day full page ad in The New York Times, that cost Palini’s parents over $14,000! Within a few weeks he had big name book publishers begging to sell the reprint editions.

So you see. What you the author are willing (or can afford) to pay for a marketing campaign, is going to determin how many book you sell, not who you choose for a publisher. Keep in mind that when you see ads for book, either in newspapers or on tv, those ads were paid for by the author him-herself, NOT the publisher.

Most writers, once hit in the face with the harsh reality of these facts, never attempt to write a second book, which is why there are so many one book authors out there.

On the other hand a self-published POD book never goes out of print and you earn 100% of the profits off the retail price.

If you are willing to promote and market your book hard enough, you’ll make more money in the long run by self-publishing, because you can keep selling your book for the next 10 or 20 years.

If you want to do as you suggest and do both POD self publish AND traditional publish, than you MUST do it the other way around. Traditional publish first and POD later.

Your best bet is to hold off on the POD right now, and focus on finding that agent. Let the traditional publisher buy the first edition rights, get paid your advance and your royalties, let them sell the first edition, than next year after the book has gone out of print, you bring it back out as a POD reprint and continue to sell it for the rest of your life. (A lot of authors do this and after writing 4 or 5 books, they have a pretty steady monthly income coming in.)

I hope this helps.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?
Do You and I Read the Same Books?
Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

black birdfall leaves centerblack bird

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

A Novel … ?

Why do so many novels state “A Novel” as part of the title? There has to be a good reason as no novel writer would want to insult thier readers’ intelligence by assuming that they the reader can nott figure it out on thier own. Right?

Well, I do not know if there is an “official” answer to that question or not, but here is what I think about it:

I like it when is says something like that, say on the bottom corner of the back cover or in some place easy to find but not in the way.

A Novel
A Gothic Novel
A Romance
A Tale of Adventure
A Collection of Short Stories
etc.

Why? Well, it tells me straight up what to expect and I as a reader know at a glance what the basic “idea” of the book is. When I see “A Novel”, I quickly asume that this is a slice-of-life story, that reads like a biography, but is really fiction.

What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this post. Leave a comment and share your views!

————-

SHIVER
Copper Cockeral
Publishing Your NaNo Novel?

Want to Give Me a Reward for Reaching 50k?
*I Love Phookas!*
Copper Cockeral

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape