Jory Lerback and Brooks Hanson present an analysis that reveals evidence of gender bias in peer review for scholarly publications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
AI in peer review: can artificial intelligence be an ally in reducing gender and geographical gaps in peer review? A randomized trial
Research Integrity and Peer Review Open Access 27 October 2025
-
Shifting landscapes of gender equity in oncology journals: a decade of authorship trends
Molecular Cancer Open Access 17 March 2025
-
The interplay of author and editor gender in acceptance delays: evidence from accounting journals
Scientometrics Open Access 27 February 2025
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
27,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
185,98 € per year
only 3,65 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
39,95 €
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Change history
06 February 2017
An earlier version of the graphic in this Comment mislabelled the bar for the acceptance rate for male first authors in their 70s.
References
Kaatz, A., Gutierrez, B. & Carnes, M. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 35, 371–373 (2014).
Holmes, M. A., O'Connell, S. & Dutt, K. Women in the Geosciences: Practical, Positive Practices toward Parity (Wiley, 2015).
Filardo, G. et al. Br. Med. J. 352, i847 (2016).
Buckley, H. L., Sciligo, A. R., Adair, K. L., Case, B. S. & Monks, J. M. NZ J. Ecol. 38, 335–339 (2014).
US National Science Foundation. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (NCSES Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System Publication, 2015); available at https://go.nature.com/2ie6agn
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women in the Laborforce: A Databook Report 1059 (2015).
Primack, R. B., Ellwood, E., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Marrs, R. & Mulligan, A. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2415–2418 (2009).
Williams, W. M. & Ceci. S. J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5360–5365 (2015).
Freeman, R. B. & Huang, W. J. Labor Econ. 33, S289–S318 (2015).
Dutt, K., Pfaff, D. L., Bernstein, A. F., Dillard, J. F. & Block, C. J. Nature Geosci. 9, 805–808 (2016).
Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S. & Meyer, J. A. Funct. Ecol. 30, 140–153 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supplementary information
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Scientists must fight for the facts 2017-Jan-24
Peer review: Troubled from the start 2016-Apr-19
Science and gender: Scientists must work harder on equality 2015-Dec-21
Nature journals offer double-blind review 2015-Feb-18
Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science 2013-Dec-11
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lerback, J., Hanson, B. Journals invite too few women to referee. Nature 541, 455–457 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/541455a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/541455a
This article is cited by
-
AI in peer review: can artificial intelligence be an ally in reducing gender and geographical gaps in peer review? A randomized trial
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2025)
-
Shifting landscapes of gender equity in oncology journals: a decade of authorship trends
Molecular Cancer (2025)
-
The interplay of author and editor gender in acceptance delays: evidence from accounting journals
Scientometrics (2025)
-
Gender Diversity in the Editorial Boards of Global Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals
Asian Bioethics Review (2025)
-
Enhancing the examination of obstacles in an automated peer review system
International Journal on Digital Libraries (2024)
