I found a blog post I drafted over a year ago, about complicated reactions to the 2008 elections, about compromise, and about cutesy sappy websites. I had just discovered “from 52 to 48 with love,” which posits a universal primary patriotism that could trump all other ideology — but still totally captivated me. In my reaction I wrote, “Maybe I just believe that Barack Obama can do the rhetorical work of creating a big tent narrative, and cutesy adolescents in front of webcams just look kind of silly. And I’m hoping that Obama is smart enough to tether that big tent facing left, if probably not in left field to begin with, and will bring all the 52 and 48 people in that direction there with him.” That day I was relishing recent victories on drug policy, reproductive justice, immigration, and affirmative action, along with Democratic victories in every branch. I started to recoup from that utter despair from 2004, when I believed that the country hated us enough to re-elect a shitty president. (Maybe parts of us were still hated in the 2008 voting booths, but at least it was contained to certain initiatives).
I have been so deeply saddened by the past 2 months, partly because of my own involvement in a 52-48 electoral loss, and partly because Obama’s tent I am under now may have once looked leftward but seems susceptible to the faintest rightward wind. It is appalling that 52 points can be enough to elect a president or mayor but not enough to hold up health care reforms like expanded Medicare and a public option against an undemocratic filibuster process. I am horrified by the plan for the troop buildup in Afghanistan and the template for fighting an all too familiar kind of war.
This feeling of being unmoored in these last months has been exacerbated by being in Connecticut — home of insurance money and Joe Lieberman of the ever-dwindling “Connecticut for Lieberman” party. The commercials about health care reform are endless, and mostly anti-reform. They speak of uncontrolled costs, irresponsible spending, and declines in quality of care, and are usually narrated by elderly people who are probably on government-run health care. These commercials air as frequently as political ads in the days before an election, and they make feel every time like I have lost. My parents are about to see their insurance monthly payments top $1,800, with a $3,000 deductible. No other plan would take my mother for less money with her pre-existing conditions. This does not even include non-covered health services (co-pays, hospital stays) which rack up pretty quickly, often exceeding $1,000 in a month. I don’t think this new health care plan will help very much at all for them, and it makes me furious. If this is what it looks like to compromise over the divide between 52 and 48, or 58 and 42, I cannot really write a love letter to the other side pledging to smile while I take these shells that may, one day, incubate real reform.* My mother is aspiring to live to see the day of government healthcare (only 2 years until her social security disability will qualify her for Medicare) and I really wanted that day to come sooner.
My first protest led by organized labor changed my life — chants could rhyme and be clever! walking in circles in front of someone’s door felt powerful! — and also targeted Joe Lieberman 8 years ago. “Where’s Joe? We don’t know! In the White House? Hell, no!” I am galvanized about Joe Lieberman, about the NY Democratic State Senators who voted against marriage equality, about a filibuster process that allows such a small number to hold up the progress of meaningful and life-changing reforms. The connections between process (overturning term limits, changing the meaning of filibuster, creating a new individualistic self-serving political party) and a lack of real progress are all too clear. All this also makes me want to know more about a parliamentary system of governance. Something has got to give here.
*This reminds me of the video of the octopus with the coconut, hauling it away to use it in an unspecified way. I find this to be an instructive metaphor for assembling tools and preparing for the future.

