| CARVIEW |
Thanks Blaze.
]]>“Thanks to the brave work of freelance journalist Gemma O’Doherty a new important information has now surfaced to the public. This brave woman has sued the Irish government over the COVID-19 lockdowns and during the process she also demanded that Ireland’s HSE prove that COVID-19 even exists.
To our surprise the HSE issued a statement where they basically said that they do not have records of the virus being isolated and therefore they do not have any proof that COVID-19 exists.
Yet on which premise do we have a “vaccine” now one may ask if the virus has never been isolated and shown under the microscope as proof that this is it, this is your COVID boogeyman.”
Which follows in the wake of this:
“During a recent interview with NBC news — covering the recent WHO investigation into the origin of the COVID-19 “virus” in China — the leading epidemiologist with the Chinese government, Dr. Wu Zunyou, admitted that they — the Chinese — have never isolated the virus, which means that the supposed genome of the COVID-19 virus that Chinese researchers published in January 2020 — and which the West has allegedly used to make the COVID vaccines — is completely fraudulent”
COVID-19 has never been proven to exist. It’s a mirage brought about by the PCR test which scientists already know is “useless”:
]]>Dear BB: I totally agree that that paragraph (of Russ’) is brilliant. Beautifully composed. I would only add that it is not only that the West sees itself as a
“decrepit, sick old man on the verge of death”. It actually IS that, increasingly. Sometimes I’m glad that I’m getting old, so I will be checking out before things really go to hell. Meanwhile, do whatever little bit I can.
Hello, Bronze Blaze! Thanks for your reply.
I wrote that “the great majority of covid dissidents — sadly — come from a strange, unsophisticated place which I will characterize (imperfectly, I admit) as the realm of right-wing/populist conspiracy theory.”
You replied: “No they do not. The Off Guardian is one of the most consistent opponents of Covidiocy from the start, and it’s a left wing website. There are numerous others as well.”
No, I’m sorry, but there are not numerous others. There are very few others. I base my view on long, nearly-daily attention to this very issue, from the start of the crisis a year ago. I have been searching HARD, right from the start, for left allies in covid dissent. They almost do not exist.
NEARLY 100% of all left, progressive and socialist sites, pundits, and platforms (e.g. youtube channels, major twitter accounts) are 100% behind the mainstream covid narrative. It pains me that that is true, but it IS true. You will find virtually no covid dissent in that sphere, with rare exceptions. Furthermore, if you attempt to speak to them with a dissenting view, they will either ignore you or react violently and then block you. This has happened to me repeatedly over the last year, so I speak from extensive bitter experience.
You wrote: “The reason it SEEMS like only “unsophisticated” people reject the Covid hoax is that they’re the only ones speaking up without first self-censoring.”
I am not talking about their view on covid. I am talking about their views generally. They tend to be unsophisticated and none too intelligent. They buy-in to shallow and easily-debunked stuff such as bullshit climate denialism. I am speaking of a generality, of course. Surely there are exceptions. But generally, what I am saying is true.
You wrote: “in leftist circles the Jonathan Cooks of the world generally set the tone for everyone, performing a kind of unofficial censorship, limiting and circumscribing the range of acceptable opinions.”
I agree.
I wrote: ““Submerged” and “drowned out” are his over-reaction and overstatement of an actual problem, such as claims that the virus does not exist at all, that NO viruses exist at all, and that all of virology is itself a big hoax, and that ALL vaccines are useless and worse, and that vaccines represent a “depopulation” agenda, and even that ALL of modern medicine is useless and worse.”
Then you wrote: “Have you actually done even the slightest modicum of research into this,”
Answer: Do you mean each of the (very different) items I listed? Yes, I’ve done a modicum on some, much more than a modicum on others.
You wrote: “or are you just assuming you already know the truth, therefore you don’t have to lift a finger to learn anything new?”
Answer: no, I am usually not assuming I already know the truth, unless I have already dug really deeply into a subject and have finally arrived at a conclusion I believe to be reasonably stable. For one example, the idea that “ALL of modern medicine is useless and worse”. There is a great abundance of evidence that that idea is false, and indeed even crazy. It is beyond any reasonable doubt.
You wrote: “I have delved heavily into this subject with an open mind,”
Answer: which subject? I mentioned several.
You wrote: “and I’ve gone from being a true believer in vaccines to an anti-vaxxer,”
Answer: I have never been a true believer in vaccines. I am a skeptic. Not an anti-vaxxer, but I am becoming more strongly anti-anti-vaxx. The anti-anti-vaxx people are often quite crazy, branding anyone with even simple questions about vaccine safety (for example) as “anti-vaxx”.
You wrote: “there is substantial evidence that almost all improvements in human health and longevity attributed to vaccination came about because of improvements in general…”
Answer: yes yes yes. I was reading Illich back in 1975, friend. And a lot else besides, in the intervening years. All that you say is true, about public health infrastructure, nutrition, etc. being more important than vaccines.
However, it is also not the last word. Vaccines HAVE saved lives. Some vaccines have been useful indeed. You could perhaps argue that (as yet ill-defined) long-term side effects might outweigh the benefits. Perhaps. But with difficulty, at best.
The whole vaccine issue is big and complex, and I hereby admit that I have not done adequate homework on it. I’m procrastinating because I know that to come up with a high-quality holistic view of the matter will take me many months of full-time study. Maybe I will get around to it, but I have a LOT of things I want to study and that is just one of them.
You wrote: “Have you not ever glanced at the scientific papers criticizing the PCR test as essentially useless”
More than “glanced”, friend! I am well aware of that whole issue. But the likelihood that this illness has been over-diagnosed by faulty PCR tech surely does NOT mean that the virus does not exist, and it very likely does not mean that “there is no pandemic at all”, as you wrote. You are going from the serious problem of PCR test inaccuracy to sweeping, unjustified conclusions. Sorry.
Stefan Lanka’s ideas are interesting but a long way from proven. We’ll see. I have an open mind, but not so far open that my brains are spilling out.
Thanks again for your reply.
]]>I would expect the same to be true of all establishment religion, whose organizations are just as inextricably entangled with the globalist technocratic governments as any other system NGO.
]]>Mostly reproduction, but apparently you can convert. I think learning the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect is the hardest part. Still, it’s the fastest growing population in the USA.
]]>Yes, I used that for a time – but then those pages came up blank too. I use a first generation iPad, anonymous, no contract in an attempt to block these problems. My iPad should not take either updates nor downloads, but somehow the WordPress updated itself into a new format which blocked all writing pages including going into old drafts. There has been a progression in deterioration of my WordPress. First the Reader went. Then the ability to add tags. Now this. Just by luck I found I could get a writing page by going back days into my History. If/when that goes I expect I will have to find another platform.
]]>