|
We all know the official story of September 11th:
four jetliners
were hijacked by groups of four and five Arabic men armed with box cutters,
who proceeded to fly three of the four jets into the
Twin Towers
and the
Pentagon.
Subsequently the World Trade Center Towers,
weakened by the impacts and fires,
collapsed into piles of rubble.
The FBI had compiled a list of hijackers within three days,
and it was so obvious that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the
operation from caves in Afghanistan, that there was no need
to seriously investigate the crime or produce evidence.
The "retaliatory" attack on the Taliban would soon commence.
Is this story true?
Its central assumptions have never been tested by an official government body
whose members lack obvious conflicts of interest.
There are numerous
red flags
in the official story,
which requires a long series of
highly improbable coincidences.
Questioning that story
is an act of responsible citizenship.
9-11 Research focuses on the facts of the attack
and analysis of the official explanation.
|
The companion site 911Review.com
provides a broader view,
including historical context
and the use of disinformation to conceal the truth.
|
|
|
Recommended sites
|
9-11 Research is an investigation and analysis
of the events of September 11, 2001.
It archives physical evidence of the crimes,
such as photographs and videos,
provides referenced reports of events relating to the crime,
and offers detailed analysis of theories of the attack,
especially those advanced by the official FEMA and NIST investigations.
Widely recognized for the quality of work it presents,
9-11 Research has been deceptively portrayed by media icons such as
Scientific American
and Popular Mechanics
as promoting the very methods and ideas it works to expose
as smokescreens to genuine investigation of the crimes of 9/11/01.
|
