| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 301
date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 22:53:30 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
location: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Oct/0013.html
cf-ray: 98b936f308de8a2a-BLR
cache-control: max-age=21600
expires: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 04:53:30 GMT
x-backend: www-mirrors
x-request-id: 98b936f308de8a2a
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; includeSubdomains; preload
content-security-policy: frame-ancestors 'self' https://cms.w3.org/ https://cms-dev.w3.org/; upgrade-insecure-requests
cf-cache-status: EXPIRED
set-cookie: __cf_bm=mN7LH4WbpKyFzRTbm1MCN4VlBUm2B6wnrr3ZfXpazdc-1759964010-1.0.1.1-Zg5SeaAJhJ4Pg55uvrEaRr5UZcIDGl2nHfY5YUQDyIRdDuIwxe.725T4fS5WDGKL8rVPvwhkAknJExEvrQARgi8ZoOxGzq9nlJ_zDjqjUQE; path=/; expires=Wed, 08-Oct-25 23:23:30 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: cloudflare
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
HTTP/2 200
date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 22:53:31 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:09:40 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 22:53:30 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98b936f85fd98087
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: MISS
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98b936f85fd98087-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
additional PROV responses from Paul Groth on 2012-10-27 (public-prov-comments@w3.org from October 2012)
additional PROV responses
- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:53:34 +0200
- To: "Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D." <Freimuth.Robert@mayo.edu>
- Cc: public-prov-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJCyKRq9zOik8zggo8YDc9ZYyP5ogZ05R9StzoOPa3kOkBZffg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Bob, Again, thank you for your help with making PROV a better specification. Below you'll find the last set of responses for the various issues that you raised. Each issue is linked back to the response. If you can provide an acknowledgement that our comment is satisfactory or if not - why. As you know this is an important part of the W3C process. As before you can just list whether your response in a reply to this email. Thanks, Paul - 1.1.29 ISSUE-524 (Bundle/Collection)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-524_.28Bundle.2FCollection.29> - 1.1.30 ISSUE-519 and ISSUE-523 (Influence Inheritance)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-519_and_ISSUE-523_.28Influence_Inheritance.29> - 1.1.31 ISSUE-521 (Responsibility Activity)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-521_.28Responsibility_Activity.29> - 1.1.34 ISSUE-518 (PrimarySource)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-518_.28PrimarySource.29> - 1.1.35 ISSUE-499 (Generation vs Activity)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-499_.28Generation_vs_Activity.29> - 1.1.36 ISSUE-529 (Empty Collection)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-529_.28Empty_Collection.29> - 1.1.39 ISSUE-498 (Relation terminology)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-498_.28Relation_terminology.29> - 1.1.41 ISSUE-463 (Overall Feedback)<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-463_.28Overall_Feedback.29>
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 07:54:01 UTC