CARVIEW |
– DRAFT –
RQTF meeting
21 May 2025
Attendees
- Present
- janina, jasonjgw, scott_h, stacey
- Regrets
- -
- Chair
- jasonjgw
- Scribe
- jasonjgw, janina, scott_h
Meeting minutes
<gb> Issue 16 not found
<gb> Issue 21 not found
<gb> Issue 17 not found
<gb> Issue 18 not found
<gb> Issue 19 not found
<gb> Issue 20 not found
<gb> Issue 16 not found
<gb> Issue 21 not found
<gb> Issue 17 not found
<gb> Issue 18 not found
<gb> Issue 19 not found
<gb> Issue 20 not found
Issue #16: Replace "overlays" as a section
<gb> Issue 16 not found
jason: asked to replace overlays as a section
not a product category, shoudl be discusison on more borader topic of browser extentsions
scott: Thought important to ack orgs turn to overlays to remediate
scott: Here in AU it's not necessrily a negative term
janina: Forthcoming CG report suggests AI not yet sufficient:
janina: https://
Janin: can reference findings of this report regarding AI relevance
jason: three actions potentially:
1. align terminology with community group report
2. make sure limitations of machine learning in remediation are clearly specified in this document
3. cite work of community group appropriately
revisit issue 16 when report comes out next week
Issue #21: Jumping to Overlays in "accessibility context" missies the real value of AI in Design and Development
<gb> Issue 21 not found
isue 21
diffent ways of machine learning bieng applied to accessibility are not currently here
possibility of restructure addressing it
janina: beleive our restructuring will cover this
janina: defer to next week to check with Josh
Issue #17:: Opportunity to disambiguate the term "AI"
<gb> Issue 17 not found
issue 17
disambiguate th term AI is discussed
janian: wants more time on defining, agreed we'd do more of this in teh introduction
stacey: good to be a bit more specific in plain language that we're talking about TTS, specific capability rathe rthan just 'AI'
janian: seems to be there
jason: difference between potential paplicaiotn of technology rather than discussing the technology itself
janina: we coudl go back to this issue once restructure complete and see what's covered or missing
jason: yes, woudl confirm examples match
janina: yes, will check this agian before publishing
zakin, next item
Issue #18: Sign language section: needs evidence, context, and explicit examples
<gb> Issue 18 not found
issue 18
sign language needs specific exmaples
stacey: relates to Section 3.10
as sits in WCAG Level AAA, not widely implemented
generative AI can provide translation services,
asking about what is evidence that AI can translat symbols,
what websites
and no dicussion on facial movements, acitons etc.
raja: general comment - use of AI broadly from emergencies, informaiton, communicating,
some use cases beneficial for generating messages where need ot know informaiton quicly that doesn't need as much emotion
thinking about the most important scenarios
Issue #19: Suggest Flow or groupings
<gb> Issue 19 not found
issue 19
askng if we shoudl ahve this structure din teh website devleopment cycle
stacey: document goes beyond tthe cycle
janina: quesiton to ask is what's our horizon in this documnt?
stacy: good to have both - today quesitons and tomorrow quesitons
jason: is this largely ocvered in teh restructure?
janian: more faminiar terminology
stacey: PDLC could be useful with ai and accessibility but is that this document
janina: wil respond loking at restructure, and reivew on near and long-term applicaibility
Diagnostics
Maybe present: janian, Janin, jason, raja, scott, stacy
All speakers: janian, Janin, janina, jason, raja, scott, stacey, stacy
Active on IRC: janina, jasonjgw, scott_h, stacey