Exporters From Japan

HOME
ABOUT
- RESULTS
- differences
- BENEFITS
- HISTORY
- TEAM
- LOCATION
- FACILITIES
- BANKING
- MEMBERSHIPS
- APPROVALS
- LICENCES
- SUPPLIERS
- SPONSORSHIPS
- MEDIA
- PRIVACY
AUCTIONS
SHIPPING
FEES
- TS REWARDS
TOOLS
guides
FAQ
CONTACT
- CONNECT

VEHICLES
BRAND
- JAPANESE CARS
  - DAIHATSU
  - EUNOS
  - FORD
  - HONDA
  - ISUZU
  - LEXUS
  - MAZDA
  - MITSUBISHI
  - MITSUOKA
  - NISSAN
  - SUBARU
  - SUZUKI
  - TOYOTA
- GERMAN CARS
- AMERICAN CARS
- BRITISH CARS
- ITALIAN CARS
- FRENCH CARS
- SWEDISH CARS
- KOREAN CARS
TYPE
- mobility
- VENDING
- instruction
- TAXIS
- AMBULANCES
- FIRE ENGINES
- HEARSES
- LIMOUSINES
- COMMERCIAL
CLASS
FUEL
TRUCKS
minitrucks
- DAIHATSU
- HONDA
- MAZDA
- MITSUBISHI
- NISSAN
- SUBARU
- SUZUKI
- DUMP
- CRANE
- CAMPER
- REFRIGERATED
- 4WD
- NEW
BUSES
MOTORHOMES
- YAHOO!
- RAKUTEN
- DEALER

PARTS
- FREE REPORT
- PARTS CONTAINERS
- PARTS SYSTEMS
- PARTS PROTECTION
- BODY SHELLS
- DISMANTLING
- ONLINE PARTS
- NEW PARTS
- INTERIOR PARTS
- EXTERIOR PARTS
  - BONNETS
  - BUMPERS
  - GRILLES
  - FENDERS
  - DOORS
  - TRUNKS
  - SPOILERS
  - LIGHTS
  - EMBLEMS
  - CAMERAS
- ENGINES
- TRANSMISSIONS
- WHEELS & TYRES
  - WHEELS
  - TYRES
CUTS
PERFORMANCE PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
MOTORBIKE PARTS
- MOTORBIKE ENGINES
- MOTORBIKE ACCESSORIES

MOTORBIKES
MARINE
FORKLIFTS
MACHINERY
AGRICULTURAL
OTHER
COUNTRY
- AUSTRALIA
- CANADA
- KENYA
- MYANMAR
- NEW ZEALAND
- PAKISTAN
- TANZANIA
- UNITED STATES

CARVIEW

MOTORHOMES

Select Language

HTTP/2 200 date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 21:47:42 GMT content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8 content-encoding: gzip content-location: 100.html vary: negotiate,Accept-Encoding tcn: choice last-modified: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:43:06 GMT cache-control: max-age=21600 expires: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 03:47:42 GMT x-backend: www-mirrors x-request-id: 98b8d6910f4b58e1 strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; includeSubdomains; preload content-security-policy: frame-ancestors 'self' https://cms.w3.org/ https://cms-dev.w3.org/; upgrade-insecure-requests cf-cache-status: BYPASS set-cookie: __cf_bm=mmAGS5mMaT0eeywwl2lnhLTivFdJXJnYv2HCIB39L3Y-1759960062-1.0.1.1-kffmr6dkFTsNE9VzYHJVtdXHQspqpeQkKPQk5Sud0Jd_Bb4eSHuzKNKWKDi1wROdx6NrpmexNPSti3F.iGu3XfBT5XN21YrXoq_NBK0dTo8; path=/; expires=Wed, 08-Oct-25 22:17:42 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None server: cloudflare cf-ray: 98b8d6910f4b58e1-BLR alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400 ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? - Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Tracker

Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracking

Summary
Issues:
- Raised
- Open
- Pending Review
- Closed
- Postponed
- All
- Create
Actions:
- Open
- Overdue
- Closed
- Pending Review
- Raise
Users
- My Tracker
Products
Agenda planning
Recent activity

Edit this issue

ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does?

Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Opened on:

2014-08-18

Description:

SPARQL has a path expression language and LD-Patch has path expression
language. They have different expressiveness, but when they are
saying the same thing, we're probably agreed they should use the same
syntax.

It seems like the use of slash may be the same. For example, "start
with node <a> then follow the <p1> property twice, then the <p2>
property once".

In SPARQL that looks like:

<a> <p1>/<p1>/<p2>

in LD-Patch that looks like:

<a> /<p1>/<p1>/<p2>

The semantics are (arguably) the same; the syntax is extremely similar,
differing only in the leading slash.

So, are the semantics really the same -- in which case the syntax
should be aligned -- or are the semantics somehow importantly
different?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: Slice semantics, and rdf:first and rdf:rest considered harmful Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2014-11-26)
Re: Slice semantics, and rdf:first and rdf:rest considered harmful Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-26)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2014-11-26)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from sandro@w3.org on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2014-11-25)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from andrei@w3.org on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-24)
Re: Updated LD Patch specification (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2014-11-24)
Updated LD Patch specification (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-21)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-11-20)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from andy@apache.org on 2014-08-23)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-20)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from andy@apache.org on 2014-08-20)
Re: [LD Patch] Links to alternatives (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-19)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from sandro@w3.org on 2014-08-19)
AUTO: Bart van Leeuwen is niet aanwezig / Bart van Leeuwen is out of the office. (returning 29-08-2014) (from Bart_van_Leeuwen@netage.nl on 2014-08-19)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from andy@apache.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from andy@apache.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from andy@apache.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from sandro@w3.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from andy@apache.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from sandro@w3.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from sandro@w3.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from sandro@w3.org on 2014-08-18)
Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from alexandre@bertails.org on 2014-08-18)
ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-08-18)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: Keep leading slash required, making use of spaces consistent in the examples in the spec.
See https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-11-24#resolution_2

Arnaud Le Hors, 5 Dec 2014, 17:38:57

Display change log

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 100.html,v 1.1 2015/08/17 04:43:06 denis Exp $

HOME
ABOUT
AUCTIONS
SHIPPING
FEES
TOOLS
HOW
FAQ
CONTACT

Original Source | Taken Source