CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 03:06:05 GMT
content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8
content-encoding: gzip
content-location: 49.html
vary: negotiate,Accept-Encoding
tcn: choice
last-modified: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 16:17:51 GMT
cache-control: max-age=21600
expires: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:06:05 GMT
x-backend: www-mirrors
x-request-id: 98baa8f67d17c1b3
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; includeSubdomains; preload
content-security-policy: frame-ancestors 'self' https://cms.w3.org/ https://cms-dev.w3.org/; upgrade-insecure-requests
cf-cache-status: BYPASS
set-cookie: __cf_bm=yKND9iYRyTeAqZKmFmFD_eNFxpnBGrOpAEbIzXnhz5Y-1759979165-1.0.1.1-VnmjbZALUS.N1unMahNemR57smnZrG1a9fMG0g7.LKIq_dGk5diQu.iNSI5d0NxkztzuQNc9RrYAMvnm4H4LwXLvVuHhROci0DkbNHwKmns; path=/; expires=Thu, 09-Oct-25 03:36:05 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98baa8f67d17c1b3-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
ISSUE-49:
Relationship of URI schemes to protocols and operations - Technical Architecture Group Tracker
Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Peter Linss <w3c@linss.com>, Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>, Chairs, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 49.html,v 1.1 2019/11/04 16:18:15 carcone Exp $
Technical Architecture Group Issue Tracking
ISSUE-49: Relationship of URI schemes to protocols and operations
schemeProtocols-49
Relationship of URI schemes to protocols and operations
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2005-02-07
- Description:
There are many situations in which there appeared to be confusion in the Web community regarding the architectural relationship between URI schemes and network protocols.
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-31 on Noah Mendelsohn to produce a new version of URI Schemes and Web Protocols - due 2007-08-24, closedACTION-67 on Dan Connolly to Wrangle an invitation for Noah to the W3C/IETF liason call - due 2007-10-25, closed- Related emails:
- Draft minutes from 2012-11-08 (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2012-11-28)
- Re: TAG Minutes for Nov. 8 (from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 2012-11-28)
- optional reading for HTTP semantics discussion (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2010-06-04)
- Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-10-13)
- Re: Alternative dereference behavior (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-09-30)
- Re: Alternative dereference behavior (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2009-09-28)
- Re: Alternative dereference behavior (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-09-28)
- Re: TAG F2F Shepherd Responsibilities (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-06-11)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp on 2009-04-02)
- Where to discuss http+srv (RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49)) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-30)
- RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-29)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-27)
- Setting TAG Priorities - Review of discussion and planning to date (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-22)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from fluffy@cisco.com on 2009-03-07)
- Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-25)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-02-24)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from fluffy@cisco.com on 2009-02-24)
- RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-02-24)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from fluffy@cisco.com on 2009-02-24)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from timbl@w3.org on 2009-02-24)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from tlr@w3.org on 2009-02-24)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from fluffy@cisco.com on 2009-02-23)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from tlr@w3.org on 2009-02-23)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-02-23)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from eran@hueniverse.com on 2009-02-23)
- Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from fluffy@cisco.com on 2009-02-23)
- http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-02-23)
- minutes: TAG face-to-face meeting, 9-11th December 2009 MIT in Cambridge MA, USA (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-01-07)
- Re: Request for Agenda items for TAG Telcon of 18th December 2008 (from connolly@w3.org on 2008-12-15)
- [tag] <none> (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2008-11-20)
- TAG Telcon Agenda for 20th Nov 2008: tagSoupIntegration-54; uriBasedPackageAccess-61; schemeProtocol-49; Safe Javascript; Dec F2F Planning; AOB (from skw@hp.com on 2008-11-19)
- TAG Weekly (from on 2007-01-23)
- TAG Weekly (from on 2007-01-23)
- TAG Weekly (from on 2006-09-26)
- (from on 2005-12-05)
- TAG face-to-face meeting, 5-6 December 2005 (from on 2005-12-05)
- [schemeProtocols-49] New draft of proposed "URI Schemes and Web Protocols" Finding (from <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> on 2005-11-21)
- TAG weekly teleconference (from on 2005-10-04)
- TAG Telcon of 23 August 2005 (from on 2005-08-23)
- TAG telcon (from on 2005-06-28)
- Minutes of TAG face-to-face meeting, 14-16 June 2005, Cambridge, MA, USA (from on 2005-06-15)
- TAG Weekly (from on 2005-05-31)
- [schemeProtocols-49] New issue on relationship of URI schemes to protocols and operations (from <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> on 2005-03-14)
- (from on 2005-03-08)
- (from on 2005-02-22)
- Possible new TAG Issue: relationship of URI schemes to protocols (from <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> on 2005-02-07)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Peter Linss <w3c@linss.com>, Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>, Chairs, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 49.html,v 1.1 2019/11/04 16:18:15 carcone Exp $