HTTP/2 200 cache-control: max-age=43200 server: Combust/Plack (Perl) vary: Accept-Encoding content-encoding: gzip content-length: 1824 content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 last-modified: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 03:49:42 GMT date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 03:49:42 GMT strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000 Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2008

Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge

Thread Previous | Thread Next

Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com> writes:
> I wonder if people just want to be able to add
> 
>     perl -MSome::Module -pe  '....'
> 
> and get (or not get) the special processing.
I don't think so. At least, not with a lot of trickery.
The <> handling and magic is deeply tied into perl. It concerns <>,
ARGV, $ARGV, ARGVOUT, eof and eof(). To replace all this (often
strange and undocumented) functionality with the simple use of a
module would be, eh, real magic.
For the time being, I've given up on this traject.
-- Johan

Thread Previous | Thread Next

• Re: Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Johan Vromans
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by chromatic
• Re: Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight againstspam deluge) by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Johan Vromans
• Re: Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Ben Morrow
• Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge (was: Senatorial (Senescent?) reflective pause) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge (was: Senatorial(Senescent?) reflective pause) by Tim Bunce
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge (was: Senatorial (Senescent?) reflective pause) by jm
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge (was: Senatorial (Senescent?) reflective pause) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge (was: Senatorial (Senescent?) reflective pause) by jvromans
• Diamond iteration (was: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Diamond iteration (was: Fighting the Good Fight against spamdeluge) by Abigail
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Roland Giersig
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Johan Vromans
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by chromatic
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by H.Merijn Brand
• Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Johan Vromans
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Roland Giersig
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by jvromans
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Johan Vromans
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by Roland Giersig
• Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Johan Vromans
• Re: Iterator::Diamond (Was: Re: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by David Nicol
• Re: Diamond iteration (was: Fighting the Good Fight against spam deluge) by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Diamond iteration (was: Fighting the Good Fight against spamdeluge) by H.Merijn Brand