CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
cache-control: max-age=43200
server: Combust/Plack (Perl)
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
content-length: 2135
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:44:46 GMT
traceparent: 7f81907df6c4aeaa79f8b20f2e894810
strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000
Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? - nntp.perl.org
Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2008
nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About

Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?
From:
Rick DelaneyDate:
July 5, 2008 08:05Subject:
Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?Message ID:
20080705150519.GC26356@bort.caOn Jul 05 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * Jan Dubois <jand@activestate.com> [2008-07-04 17:55]: > > I think the "Foo->method" call should generate a warning that > > it is being resolved as "Foo()->method" > > Let’s not do that. It’s the only sane way to make aliased.pm > work. (<https://search.cpan.org/dist/aliased/>) If the warning went in the peephole optimizer instead of the tokenizer (which I think would be easier to implement anyway) then it wouldn't be a problem for aliased. That is, if aliased implented things with constant subs, which it should anyway, then they would already be constant-folded and no warning would occur. -- Rick Delaney rick@bort.ca
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Tom Christiansen
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by demerphq
- strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
- RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Eric Wilhelm
- RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Rick Delaney
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jonathan Rockway
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Alexandr Ciornii
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
- RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by merlyn
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
- RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jesse Vincent
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Elliot Shank
- RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
- RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Nicol
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Glenn Linderman
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Paul Fenwick
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Dr.Ruud
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Golden
- Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About