HTTP/2 200 cache-control: max-age=43200 server: Combust/Plack (Perl) vary: Accept-Encoding content-encoding: gzip content-length: 2386 content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 last-modified: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 21:37:30 GMT date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 21:37:30 GMT strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000 Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2008

Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?

Thread Previous | Thread Next

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:13:35 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> I'm prepared to alter all my code for this to
> 
> 	print { $fh } data;
> 
> Which is the documented alternative, and looks (almost) as good as the
> common use of your example.
That's still indirect object syntax, and for print (and presumably
other builtins) it's still special cased to compile to the print
opcode, not an actual method call:
• [syeeda:~] nothingmuch % perl -MO=Concise -e 'print { $fh } "foo"'
8  <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC ->(end)
1     <0> enter ->2
2     <;> nextstate(main 2 -e:1) v:{ ->3
7     <@> print vKS ->8
3        <0> pushmark s ->4
5        <1> rv2gv sKR/1 ->6
-           <@> scope sK ->5
-              <0> ex-nextstate v ->4
-              <1> ex-rv2sv sK/1 ->-
4                 <$> gvsv(*fh) s ->5
6        <$> const(PV "foo") s ->7
-e syntax OK
• [syeeda:~] nothingmuch % perl -MO=Concise -e 'typo { $fh } "foo"'
8  <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC ->(end)
1     <0> enter ->2
2     <;> nextstate(main 2 -e:1) v:{ ->3
7     <1> entersub[t1] vKS/TARG ->8
3        <0> pushmark s ->4
-        <@> scope lKM ->5
-           <0> ex-nextstate v ->4
-           <1> ex-rv2sv sKM/1 ->-
4              <$> gvsv(*fh) s ->5
5        <$> const(PV "foo") sM ->6
6        <$> method_named(PV "typo") ->7
-e syntax OK
-- 
  Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch@woobling.org>
https://nothingmuch.woobling.org  0xEBD27418

Thread Previous | Thread Next

• strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Eric Wilhelm
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Rick Delaney
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jonathan Rockway
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Alexandr Ciornii
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by merlyn
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jesse Vincent
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Elliot Shank
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Nicol
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Glenn Linderman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Paul Fenwick
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Dr.Ruud
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Golden
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Tom Christiansen
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by demerphq