HTTP/2 200 cache-control: max-age=43200 server: Combust/Plack (Perl) vary: Accept-Encoding content-encoding: gzip content-length: 2147 content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 last-modified: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 00:25:03 GMT date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 00:25:03 GMT strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000 Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2008

Re: strictly no indirect object syntax?

Thread Previous | Thread Next

On Thu, July 3, 2008 3:52 am, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:01:29 +0100, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote:
> karuda has to be better in /something/. Personally I would love to see
> indirect object notation die completely, but that would break too much.
Which is good reason to have a lexically scoped pragma to disable it.
>> I'm not convinced that it should go on use strict as a new stricture.
And strict is the natural choice for such a pragma, IMO.
We could have a fabulous bike-shedding (it's been verbed, I saw recently)
about what to call it...I offer use strict "method_calls" as a starting
point.

Thread Previous | Thread Next

• strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Eric Wilhelm
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Rick Delaney
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jonathan Rockway
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Alexandr Ciornii
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by merlyn
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jesse Vincent
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Elliot Shank
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Nicol
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Glenn Linderman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Paul Fenwick
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Dr.Ruud
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Golden
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Tom Christiansen
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by demerphq