HTTP/2 200 cache-control: max-age=43200 server: Combust/Plack (Perl) vary: Accept-Encoding content-encoding: gzip content-length: 2074 content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 last-modified: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 00:28:32 GMT traceparent: eb5a8d2f900c3edc3956becea529360d strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000 Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2008

RE: strictly no indirect object syntax?

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Alexandr Ciornii wrote:
> 2008/7/3 Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>:
> > Would it be viable to add a feature to the parser to outlaw invalid
> > object syntax? I'm not convinced that it should go on use strict as
> > a new stricture.
>
> I was thinking about this for some time. IMHO best way is making "use
> 5.012" die on indirect object syntax. Are there any cases when
> indirect object syntax is good?
    print $fh $data;
looks somewhat nicer than
    $fh->print($data);
But I guess it is a matter of personal taste.
Cheers,
-Jan

• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Tom Christiansen
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by demerphq
• strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Gabor Szabo
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Eric Wilhelm
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Rick Delaney
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jonathan Rockway
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Alexandr Ciornii
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jan Dubois
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by merlyn
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Jesse Vincent
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by chromatic
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Elliot Shank
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Abigail
• RE: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ed Avis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Reini Urban
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Nicol
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Glenn Linderman
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Paul Fenwick
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Bram
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Ben Morrow
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Dr.Ruud
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by David Golden
• Re: strictly no indirect object syntax? by Yuval Kogman