Modern communications mean most individuals today walk around with a beacon that transmits their location. Mobile phones register to a nearby tower as the owner moves through space and the phone company can collect that data in real time or retrospectively to physically place the phone with varying degrees of accuracy. Companies can also determine the owner of every handset within range of a particular tower. GPS enabled phones enable far more precise location placement. Many cars now have GPS devices installed some of which transmit the vehicle’s location to a centralized service. As the devices get cheaper and smaller law enforcement agencies can more easily attach GPS trackers to cars and individuals enabling precise round-the-clock surveillance without ever leaving the precinct. Location-based services including maps of nearby restaurants friend finders and other social networks collect location data as part of providing the service or for contextual advertising.
EFF is fighting to protect the privacy and prevent the misuse of this data that users of phones GPS transmitters and location-based services leak to providers and to the government. In our cell tracking and GPS tracking cases we advocate that the law protect this information by requiring police to get a search warrant before obtaining this sensitive data. We also work to ensure that location based service providers don’t abuse the information they collect on their customers or hand it off to other companies or the police without consent or probable cause.
-
September 14, 2015
-
September 10, 2015
-
September 3, 2015
-
July 29, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
June 16, 2015
-
June 15, 2015
-
May 7, 2015
-
February 9, 2015
-
January 2, 2015
- 1 of 12
- next ›
-
August 31, 2015
-
August 3, 2015
-
March 10, 2015
-
March 18, 2014
-
February 18, 2014
-
May 6, 2013
-
February 11, 2013
-
January 22, 2013
-
August 14, 2012
-
March 19, 2012
-
January 23, 2012
-
January 10, 2012
-
October 3, 2011
-
August 6, 2010
-
September 11, 2008
Pages
-
September 24, 2015
-
September 14, 2015
-
September 4, 2015
-
September 4, 2015
-
September 3, 2015
-
September 3, 2015
-
August 26, 2015
-
August 24, 2015
-
August 14, 2015
-
August 6, 2015
-
July 29, 2015
-
July 22, 2015
-
July 18, 2015
-
July 7, 2015
-
July 6, 2015
Pages
-
August 31, 2015
-
August 5, 2015
-
July 30, 2015
-
July 29, 2015
-
July 29, 2015
-
July 29, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
July 28, 2015
-
June 12, 2015
-
May 5, 2015
-
April 22, 2015
-
March 9, 2015
-
March 9, 2015
Pages
-
-
Police shouldn’t be able to get your sensitive location data – information that can reveal your religion, health, hobbies, and politics – on a whim.
-
EFF urged the high court of Massachusetts to protect the rights of passengers in cars that law enforcement are tracking with GPS surveillance technology, arguing that both the driver and the passenger of a car have legal standing to challenge the collection of sensitive location data gathered by
-
EFF filed an amicus brief with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, asking it to rule police must get a search warrant in order to access historical cell site information.
-
Together with the ACLU and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, EFF filed an amicus brief arguing police needed to obtain a search warrant in order to monitor a car's location with a GPS device.
-
In January 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that Americans have constitutional protections against GPS surveillance by law enforcement, holding that GPS tracking is a "search" under the Fourth Amendment.
-
Defendant Aaron Graham was suspected in a series of armed robberies around Baltimore. Without a warrant, police obtained 221 days of historical cell site location information about Graham from Sprint, which detailed 29,000 location points, an average of 100 data points a day.
-
When the U.S.
-
A federal magistrate judge in San Jose, California denied a government request for historical cell site records, ordering the government to seek a search warrant for the information. The government appealed this order to U.S.
-
Police obtained 67 days worth of location information, detailing more than 11,000 specific cell site locations, to pinpoint defendant Quartavious Davis at various robberies without a search warrant.
-
California State Senator Mark Leno has introduced critical new legislation to update privacy laws around our electronic communications.