Suck

Hey, remember Suck? This article is ten years old and is about a defunct web site ten years older than that, but Suck was one of the best things to climb out of the slime of the primordial web, and this retro-retrospective made me all nostalgic.

Somewhere around a year in to Suck's lifetime I was on "vacation" and I read the whole site from the beginning in one sitting, and then sent them a rambling stream-of-consciousness fan letter that didn't have much in the way of sentence- or paragraph breaks. Carl said, "You read all of Suck? Even we don't have the courage to do that," and then he sent me a t-shirt.

The other day this guy was interviewing me and we talked about Suck and how it had managed to capture a snapshot of the festering shitstain that passed for "tech culture" -- "Way better than fucking Dilbert did", I said -- and we laughed a dejected laugh.

The Big Fish

Anuff learned that HotWired was hiring, and was soon invited for an interview with Steadman and Bayers. "I don't know what Carl saw in me, other than somebody who probably believed in too many things, and I think Carl relished the opportunity to crush those beliefs." [...]

Like Polly, the Suck office in Filler was a nastier, more contentious place than its real-world counterpart, but not by much. "I'd say a lot of it was driven by actual true stuff," says Anuff. "I don't know if it was verbatim true. Heather is one colicky baby. She was fighting with everybody. She used to go at it with Ana, with Carl, with me, with Terry, with Matt. Oh my god, Matt Beer. And then Ana, of course, is a terror, too. What a bunch of fucking babies. In some sense it was the most unprofessional group of crybabies, prima donnas, and problem employees. Everybody there was a problem. I don't even think I knew any better, because I was a problem too."

"The domain suck.com is for sale. To purchase, click here for more details."

Tags: doomed, firstperson, nscp, www

These companies are both destroying the personal lives of their employees and getting nothing in return.

Many people believe that weekends and the 40-hour workweek are some sort of great compromise between capitalism and hedonism.

You might think: but if you had prioritized those things, wouldn't your contributions have been reduced? Would Facebook have been less successful?

Actually, I believe I would have been more effective: a better leader and a more focused employee. I would have had fewer panic attacks, and acute health problems  --  like throwing out my back regularly in my early 20s. I would have picked fewer petty fights with my peers in the organization, because I would have been generally more centered and self-reflective. I would have been less frustrated and resentful when things went wrong, and required me to put in even more hours to deal with a local crisis. In short, I would have had more energy and spent it in smarter ways... AND I would have been happier. That's why this is a true regret for me: I don't feel like I chose between two worthy outcomes. No, I made a foolish sacrifice on both sides. [...]

Many people believe that weekends and the 40-hour workweek are some sort of great compromise between capitalism and hedonism, but that's not historically accurate. They are actually the carefully considered outcome of profit-maximizing research by Henry Ford in the early part of the 20th century. He discovered that you could actually get more output out of people by having them work fewer days and fewer hours. Since then, other researchers have continued to study this phenomenon, including in more modern industries like game development.

The research is clear: beyond ~40 -- 50 hours per week, the marginal returns from additional work decrease rapidly and quickly become negative. We have also demonstrated that though you can get more output for a few weeks during "crunch time" you still ultimately pay for it later when people inevitably need to recover. If you try to sustain crunch time for longer than that, you are merely creating the illusion of increased velocity. This is true at multiple levels of abstraction: the hours worked per week, the number of consecutive minutes of focus vs. rest time in a given session, and the amount of vacation days you take in a year.

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Tags: conspiracies, corporations, doomed, nscp

ceiling jwz is watching you defcon

Messages
Edit
Violet
So, how's hacking the planet going? Shout out to Crash Override and also Joey.
Funny thing: Defcon commandeered the "about" channel on the hotel TV network, and it's showing a documentary on Netscape: you are on my TV right now!
And you are talking about Hackers the movie...
I stand by my words on that movie. It is still awesome.
Now Point Break is on. "You tellin' me the FBI is gonna teach me how to surf?"
Utah! Get me two!
Delivered
Send

Tags: dnalounge, fanboys, firstperson, movies, nscp

Worst. Prisoner's Dilemma. Evar.

Hostage Situation:

Even if you're overoptimistic by a factor of five and it's only a 20% savings we'd hire you tomorrow to build that for us. You can have a plane ticket to wherever you want to work and the best hardware money can buy and real engineering support to deploy something you've already mostly built and proven. [...]

And we look at that and say: what if you've got nothing? How can we know, without something we can audit and test? Of course, all the supporting research is paywalled PDFs with no concomitant code or data either, so by any metric that matters -- and the only metric that matters here is "code I can run against data I can verify" -- it doesn't exist.

Those aren't metrics that matter to you, though. What matters to you is either "getting a tenure-track position" or "getting hired to do work in your field". And by and large the academic tenure track doesn't care about open access, so you're afraid that actually showing your work will actively hurt your likelihood of getting either of those jobs.

So here we are in this bizarro academic-research standoff, where I can’t work with you without your tipping your hand, and you can’t tip your hand for fear I won’t want to work with you. And so all of this work that could accomplish amazing things for a real company shipping real software that really matters to real people – five or six years of the best work you’ve ever done, probably – just sits on the shelf rotting away.

Previously, previously.

Tags: computers, copyright, doomed, nscp

The Emularity

@textfiles: "Somewhere @jwz and @BrendanEich just popped their eyes open in bed, like ancient sorcerers who realize the Dark Rock of Mothrir was unsealed"
Last week, on the heels of the DOS emulation announcement, one of the JSMESS developers, James Baicoianu, got Windows 3.11 running in a window with Javascript. [...]

That's Netscape 1.0n, released in December of 1994, running inside Windows 3.11, released in August of 1993, running inside of Google Chrome 39.0.2171.99 m, released about a week ago, on a Windows 7 PC, released in 2009.

Your turtles (who, I understand, go all the way down) will be wanting my http10proxy.

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Tags: computers, linux, mad science, nscp, retrocomputing

"THE BUILD IS BROKEN. BRENDAN BROKE THE BUILD."

Tinderbox was our second or third most important export, neck-and-neck with Bugzilla.

Farewell to Tinderbox, the world's 1st? 2nd? Continuous Integration server

In April 1997, Netscape Release Engineers wrote, and started running, the world's first? second? continuous integration server. Now, just over 17 years later, in May 2014, the tinderbox server was finally turned off. Permanently.

This is a historic moment for Mozilla, and for the software industry in general, so I thought people might find it interesting to get some background, as well as outline the assumptions we changed when designing the replacement Continuous Integration and Release Engineering infrastructure now in use at Mozilla.

Previously, previously, previously.

Tags: computers, nscp, retrocomputing

Firefox and MP3s

Dear Lazyweb, if you know why Firefox can no longer play the DNA Lounge audio archives, please let me know.

"Media resource http://cerebrum.dnalounge.com:8001/audio/2014/05-22d.mp3 could not be decoded."

Apparently adding DRM is just fine but continuing to be able to play MP3s is beyond the pale.

Previously, previously, previously.

Tags: dnalounge, firstperson, lazyweb, nscp, webcasting, www

Anachronism Proxy

Web Rendering Proxy

WRP is a HTTP proxy service that renders web pages in to GIF images associated with a clickable imagemap of the original web links. It allows to use historical and obsolete web browsers on the modern web.

See also my http10proxy.

Previously, previously, previously.

Tags: nscp, retrocomputing, www

PSA: Upgrade your Apple shit, seriously.

I've spoken with a few people recently who, if they were even aware of the recent Apple security bug, don't seem to appreciate the magnitude of it.

It's basically the worst security bug in the history of security bugs.

If you are using a Mac running 10.7 or later, an iPhone 4 or later, or an iPad 2 or later, you have to upgrade your OS, right now.

If, like me, you've been putting off upgrading from iOS 6 to iOS 7, bummer. You don't have a choice now.

Here's a site that may test whether you're vulnerable.

Jeff Weinstein said, "Thanks, Apple, for making the Netscape Random Number Seed bug look minor."

Someone else said, "If you want a tour of of the Oval Office, just write 'Mr. President' on your t-shirt. They probably haven't upgraded yet."

It's egregious enough that enemy action isn't entirely out of the question.

Tags: doomed, firstperson, mac, nscp, phones, security

W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards

Everything is terrible.

Here's the bad news: the World Wide Web Consortium is going ahead with its plan to add DRM to HTML5, setting the stage for browsers that are designed to disobey their owners and to keep secrets from them so they can't be forced to do as they're told. Here's the (much) worse news: the decision to go forward with the project of standardizing DRM for the Web came from Tim Berners-Lee himself, who seems to have bought into the lie that Hollywood will abandon the Web and move somewhere else (AOL?) if they don't get to redesign the open Internet to suit their latest profit-maximization scheme.

Danny O'Brien from the Electronic Frontier Foundation explains the wrangle at the W3C and predicts that, now that it's kosher to contemplate locking up browsers against their owners, we'll see every kind of control-freakery come out of the woodwork, from flags that prevent "View Source" to restricting embedded fonts to preventing image downloading to Javascript that you can't save and run offline. Indeed, some of this stuff is already underway at W3C, spurred into existence by a huge shift in the Web from open platform to a place where DRM-hobbled browsers are "in-scope" for the WC3.

Previously, previously.

Tags: big brother, computers, copyright, corporations, doomed, nscp, security, the future, tv, webcasting, www