Modern communications mean most individuals today walk around with a beacon that transmits their location. Mobile phones register to a nearby tower as the owner moves through space and the phone company can collect that data in real time or retrospectively to physically place the phone with varying degrees of accuracy. Companies can also determine the owner of every handset within range of a particular tower. GPS enabled phones enable far more precise location placement. Many cars now have GPS devices installed some of which transmit the vehicle’s location to a centralized service. As the devices get cheaper and smaller law enforcement agencies can more easily attach GPS trackers to cars and individuals enabling precise round-the-clock surveillance without ever leaving the precinct. Location-based services including maps of nearby restaurants friend finders and other social networks collect location data as part of providing the service or for contextual advertising.
EFF is fighting to protect the privacy and prevent the misuse of this data that users of phones GPS transmitters and location-based services leak to providers and to the government. In our cell tracking and GPS tracking cases we advocate that the law protect this information by requiring police to get a search warrant before obtaining this sensitive data. We also work to ensure that location based service providers don’t abuse the information they collect on their customers or hand it off to other companies or the police without consent or probable cause.
-
June 16, 2015
-
June 15, 2015
-
May 7, 2015
-
February 9, 2015
-
January 2, 2015
-
December 23, 2014
-
November 18, 2014
-
October 29, 2014
-
October 15, 2014
-
October 6, 2014
- 1 of 11
- next ›
-
March 10, 2015
-
March 18, 2014
-
February 18, 2014
-
May 6, 2013
-
February 11, 2013
-
January 22, 2013
-
August 14, 2012
-
March 19, 2012
-
January 23, 2012
-
January 10, 2012
-
October 3, 2011
-
August 6, 2010
-
September 11, 2008
-
August 5, 2008
-
December 6, 2005
Pages
-
June 27, 2015
-
June 23, 2015
-
June 8, 2015
-
June 5, 2015
-
May 24, 2015
-
May 22, 2015
-
May 15, 2015
-
May 13, 2015
-
May 7, 2015
-
May 3, 2015
-
April 28, 2015
-
April 27, 2015
-
April 27, 2015
-
April 12, 2015
-
April 9, 2015
Pages
-
June 12, 2015
-
May 5, 2015
-
April 22, 2015
-
March 9, 2015
-
March 9, 2015
-
February 11, 2015
Amicus Brief filed on behalf of Northern California Chapter of Society of Professional Journalists in support of EFF and ACLU-SoCal’s appellate petition for writ of mandate in our case seeking access to a week’s worth of Los Angeles law enforcement ALPR license plate data.
-
February 10, 2015
Amicus Brief filed on behalf of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Los Angeles Times, California Newspaper Publishers Association, Californians Aware, and the McClatchy Company in support of EFF and ACLU-SoCal’s appellate petition for writ of mandate in our case seeking access to a week’s worth of Los Angeles law enforcement ALPR license plate data.
-
December 17, 2014
-
November 18, 2014
-
November 17, 2014
-
November 17, 2014
-
November 17, 2014
-
November 17, 2014
-
November 15, 2014
-
October 1, 2014
-
September 4, 2014
-
September 3, 2014
-
August 8, 2014
-
July 29, 2014
-
July 29, 2014
Pages
-
-
Police shouldn’t be able to get your sensitive location data – information that can reveal your religion, health, hobbies, and politics – on a whim.
-
EFF urged the high court of Massachusetts to protect the rights of passengers in cars that law enforcement are tracking with GPS surveillance technology, arguing that both the driver and the passenger of a car have legal standing to challenge the collection of sensitive location data gathered by
-
EFF filed an amicus brief with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, asking it to rule police must get a search warrant in order to access historical cell site information.
-
When the U.S.
-
Together with the ACLU and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, EFF filed an amicus brief arguing police needed to obtain a search warrant in order to monitor a car's location with a GPS device.
-
In January 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that Americans have constitutional protections against GPS surveillance by law enforcement, holding that GPS tracking is a "search" under the Fourth Amendment.
-
Police obtained 67 days worth of location information, detailing more than 11,000 specific cell site locations, to pinpoint defendant Quartavious Davis at various robberies without a search warrant.
-
California State Senator Mark Leno has introduced critical new legislation to update privacy laws around our electronic communications.