CARVIEW |
ujihisa / bfc
- Source
- Commits
- Network (1)
- Graphs
-
Branch:
master
click here to add a description
click here to add a homepage
-
Branches (1)
- master ✓
- Tags (1)
Pledgie Donations
Once activated, we'll place the following badge in your repository's detail box:
Brainf**c Compilers (BF to Ruby, C, Haskell, Scheme and LLVM) — Read more
name | age | message | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
.gitignore | Wed Dec 23 19:48:35 -0800 2009 | Implemented Ruby and C [ujihisa] |
![]() |
README.md | Sun Dec 27 14:11:35 -0800 2009 | Natural English * Thanks to Katie K.! [ujihisa] |
![]() |
bfc.rb | Sun Dec 27 15:19:17 -0800 2009 | bugfix. nested [] causes an error. [nanki] |
![]() |
echo.bf | Sun Dec 27 15:19:17 -0800 2009 | bugfix. nested [] causes an error. [nanki] |
![]() |
helloworld.bf | Wed Dec 23 19:48:35 -0800 2009 | Implemented Ruby and C [ujihisa] |
BFC: Brainf**k Compilers
bfc.rb
is a compiler written in Ruby, which can compile BF code to Ruby, C, Haskell and LLVM.
USAGE
$ ./bfc.rb --help
$ ./bfc.rb [-v|--version]
$ ./bfc.rb [-r|--ruby] helloworld.bf > helloworld.rb
$ ./bfc.rb [-c|--c] helloworld.bf > helloworld.c
$ ./bfc.rb [-h|--haskell] helloworld.bf > helloworld.hs
$ ./bfc.rb [-l|--llvm] helloworld.bf > helloworld.ll
$ ./bfc.rb [-s|--scheme] helloworld.bf > helloworld.scm
$ cat helloworld.bf | ./bfc.rb --ruby
$ ./bfc.rb [-r|--ruby|-c|--c|-h|--haskell|-l|--llvm] helloworld.bf --run
$ ./bfc.rb [-c|--c] helloworld.bf --without-while > helloworld.c
$ spec ./bfc.rb
AUTHOR
Tatsuhiro Ujihisa https://ujihisa.blogspot.com/
LICENCE
MIT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Without Nanki's bugfixes and advice, this project would have never finished. https://blog.netswitch.jp/
ANATOMY OF BFC
THE BRAINF**K LANGUAGE
According to Wikipedia, the programming language Brainf**k has the following 8 tokens that each have semantics. Here is the equivalent transformation from Brainf**k to C.
The bfc.rb
converts BF codes to each languages mostly based on the table.
C Translation Table in bfc.rb
:
',' => '*h=getchar();',
'.' => 'putchar(*h);',
'-' => '--*h;',
'+' => '++*h;',
'<' => '--h;',
'>' => '++h;',
'[' => 'while(*h){',
']' => '}'
Ruby Translation Table in bfc.rb
:
',' => 'a[i]=STDIN.getc.ord',
'.' => 'STDOUT.putc(a[i])',
'-' => 'a[i]-=1',
'+' => 'a[i]+=1',
'<' => 'i-=1',
'>' => 'i+=1',
'[' => 'while a[i]!=0',
']' => 'end'
They are straightforward enough not to be explained the detail.
In the same way, we can write translation tables for most programming languages except special languages including Haskell and Assembly languages.
TRANSLATING TO HASKELL
Translating BF to Haskell needs two tricks. Haskell was difficult to handle BF because:
- Variables in Haskell are not allowed to be re-assigned
++h
is impossible
- There's no feature like
while
statement
So I used IO Monad with biding same-name variables, and defined while
function.
Haskell Translation Table in bfc.rb
:
',' => 'tmp <- getChar; h <- return $ update (\_ -> ord tmp) i h;',
'.' => 'putChar $ chr $ h !! i;',
'-' => 'h <- return $ update (subtract 1) i h;',
'+' => 'h <- return $ update (+ 1) i h;',
'<' => 'i <- return $ i - 1;',
'>' => 'i <- return $ i + 1;',
'[' => '(h, i) <- while (\(h, i) -> (h !! i) /= 0) (\(h, i) -> do {',
']' => 'return (h, i);}) (h, i);'
And the definition of while
is:
while cond action x
| cond x = action x >>= while cond action
| otherwise = return x
This is short, but can handle loop with changing the value with larger scope like C's.
TRANSLATING TO C WITHOUT WHILE STATEMENTS
Unlike the effort on Haskell, it is impossible to write simple translation table for C when I can use only goto
for control flows instead of while
statements. So I made the compile to have label counters to make labels for goto
a lot.
Excerpt from bfc.c
:
when ','; '*h=getchar();'
when '.'; 'putchar(*h);'
when '-'; '--*h;'
when '+'; '++*h;'
when '<'; '--h;'
when '>'; '++h;'
when '['; "do#{counter += 1}:"
when ']'
"if (*h != 0) goto do#{counter}; else goto end#{counter};" <<
"end#{counter}:"
end
TRANSLATING TO LLVM
LLVM Assembly language is similar to Haskell to the extent of the prohibition of re-assignments, and not similar to Haskell to the extend of having do
syntax for Monad. So I decided to use pointers to store values. Also, LLVM needs many temporary variables which cannot be re-assigned, so I used counters again to use temporary constants.
The translation table with counters is too big to paste here, so I'll just show the definition of '+'
which means '++h'
in C.
when '+'
a = tc += 1; b = tc += 1; c = tc += 1; d = tc += 1
"%tmp#{a} = load i32* %i, align 4\n" <<
"%tmp#{b} = getelementptr [1024 x i8]* %h, i32 0, i32 %tmp#{a}\n" <<
"%tmp#{c} = load i8* %tmp#{b}, align 1\n" <<
"%tmp#{d} = add i8 1, %tmp#{c}\n" <<
"store i8 %tmp#{d}, i8* %tmp#{b}, align 1\n"
(where tc
is the abbreviation of tmp counter
.)
One more thing. LLVM is famous for its aggressive optimizations. For example, the result of the conversion from helloworld.bf
to LLVM Assembly Language is very long.
$ ./bfc.rb --llvm ./helloworld.bf | wc -l
2842
But once you optimize the assembly by opt
command of LLVM, the line of code will become shorter and more succinct.