CARVIEW |
December 07, 2006
Reading with Edward Tufte
Today, a group of thirteen Vertigo folks, including myself, attended Edware Tufte's one-day course on Presenting Data and Information in San Francisco. The course is $360 for the day, but that includes all four of Tufte's books, which are currently going for about $141 new on Amazon. We had a group of more than ten, so we received the 25% group discount. The net cost is about $130 for a day with Tufte.
Once you start Tufte's course, you'll immediately realize why all four books are included in the course cost.
It's not due to any particular generosity on Tufte's part-- he uses the books as high-resolution handouts. Tufte only uses projectors and computers for a handful of images and movies. Everything else begins with a scholarly "please turn to page (n) of your books".
And they are truly wonderful books. I've been a Tufte fan for years, so I already owned a set, but it's worth attending his course just to get the books.
His writing is fantastic, but it can be dry at times. I was surprised to find that Edward Tufte is a funny, animated speaker. We spent all morning reading through about a half-dozen sections in his last three books. Although I've read them all before, it was illuminating to have Tufte guide us through the reading selections and provide running commentary. It complemented the text nicely. He brought out a lot of nuances in the text that I completely glossed over in my initial read. The latter half of the day was split between sparklines and avoiding the pitfalls of PowerPoint. As usual, everything was presented directly from the books.
Should you attend a Tufte course? If you can swing it, and if there's one in your area, I definitely recommend it. There's nothing in the course you couldn't get directly from the books yourself, but the material is always more effective when it's presented by a good teacher.
As you enter the course, you're provided a folded four-page handout. One of the highlights in this handout is a section titled "An Education for Analytical Design". It's a cheat sheet of sorts, and you know how I love cheatsheets. I'll reprint it here exactly as Tufte entered it, adding hyperlinks for easier browsing:
An Education for Analytical DesignFundamentals Josef Albers, Interaction of Color Robert Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style Joseph Lowman, Mastering the Techniques of Teaching Scott McCloud, Understanding Comics Marcel Minnaert, Light and Color in the Outdoors Donald Norman, The Design of Everyday Things Strunk and White, The Elements of Style, the last chapter on style (read once a year) Norman J.W.Thrower, Maps and Civilization Edward Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information Edward Tufte, Envisioning Information Edward Tufte, Visual Explanations Edward Tufte, Beautiful Evidence
Advanced Readings Rudolf Arnheim, Visual Thinking William Cleveland, The Elements of Graphing Data and his Visualizing Data Eduard Imhoff, Cartographic Relief Presentation Stewart Brand, The Clock of the Long Now: Time and Responsibility Alan Cooper, About Face Ben Shneiderman, Designing the User Inteface Philip Greenspun, Philip and Alex's Guide to Web Publishing
Videos Video and book: Powers of Ten (watch video) by Philip Morrison and Phylis Morrison and The Office of Charles and Ray Eames; Sorting out Sorting (watch video) by Ronald Baecker; Project MATHEMATICS! (watch videos) by Tom M. Apostol and James F. Blinn
Internet www.google.com (also searches images!) www.aldaily.com www.bookfinder.com www.asktog.com www.amazon.com setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu www.junkbusters.com www.photo.net www.science.nasa.gov www.musanim.com (to order the Music Animation Machine videotape)
Computer Programs For serious data analysis, use a high-end statistics package such as Origin 6.0, SYSTAT 8.0, Datadesk, STATA, SAS, SPSS, SigmaPlot, S-PLUS. See sparklines essay on Ask ET forum for more on production issues.
Courses Writing, general science, statistics (data analysis, research design), applied mathematics, cartography, medical illustration, architecture, publishing, typography, color, book design, film-making, computers, scientific visualization
Personal Favorites Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, et al., A Pattern Language; Robert Merton, On the Shoulders of Giants; Evelyn Waugh, Scoop; Italo Calvino novels; Gore Vidal literary essays; The Paris Review Interviews; Writers at Work (15 volumes); Paul Klee, Notebooks; Richard P. Feynman, "Surely You Are Joking, Mr. Feynman," and "What Do You Care What Other People Think"
Some 20th Century Classics of Information ArchitectureThat should be enough to keep us busy for a while. And be sure to check out the hilarious Viz-o-Matic video that E.T. showed during the class, too!Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram, 1912. Relating the brightness of stars to their spectrum and temperature, this diagram showed the unexpected, brought together many dimensions of information into a coherent pattern, and has remained relevant for understanding the evolution of stars for nearly a century now. The diagram also accommodates the modern intensifying of information: the first plot contained 300 stars; recent diagrams show data from 93,000 stars.
Harry Beck, The London Underground Map, 1933. Beck's diagram of the seven lines of the London Underground, though geographically inaccurate, provides a coherent overview of a complex system. With excellent color printing, classic British railroad typography, and, in the modern style, only horizontal, vertical, and 45 degree lines, the map became a beautiful organizing image of London. Despite 65 years of revisions due to the extensions of the Underground and bureaucratic tinkering with the design, the map nicely survives to this day. European and American knock-offs did not succeed.
Roger Tory Peterson, A Field Guide to The Birds, 1934. This book exemplifies the modern field guide, visually demonstrating to every reader the richness of biological diversity by means of "diagnostic marks" (pointers indicating small but telltale differences among birds). With some 5.5 million copies in print, the book got tens of millions of people outdoors looking at birds -- and also thinking about how to preserve the diversity and complexity of nature.
Jan Tschichold and Penguin Books, 1947-1949. These inexpensive paperbacks brought the classics -- and a good many current books as well -- to the mass market. Tschichold set a consistent design for the Penguin books, with clear, elegant, timeless typography that endlessly serves the content.
Swiss Mountain Maps, Bundesamt Fur Landestopographie. Beautiful layering and separation, excellent three-dimensional effects (shading, contour lines, labels), superb resolution. The best national maps (of course, the Swiss have good content to work with!).
James D. Watson and Francis Crick, Molecular Structure for DNA, 1953. The double helix of DNA, a distinctly high resolution design, is Nature's information architecture for all life forms. Since the two strands of the helix are complimentary, the very architecture suggests how DNA replicates itself and how genetic information is communicated from generation to generation.
NASA, Global Temperature Maps, 1960. For nearly 40 years, satellites have continuously measured the temperature of the Earth's surface and atmosphere. High resolution visual displays provide the only way to comprehend these multidimensional data files of trillions of numbers that help to assess the longrun history of global temperature change.
The OAG Pocket Flight Guide. A thousand pages of tiny type published each month on thin paper, this nice pocket book shows approximately 200,000 flight schedules. The guide gives control of the information -- and therefore greater choice -- to individual travellers, protecting them from the biases of travel agents and airlines. Used at the airport, this high resolution classic of information display also assists recovery from delayed or cancelled flights. Requires reading-glasses for those of a certain age.
Douglas Engelbart and Xerox Parc, The Graphical User Interface, 1965-1981. Until 10-15 years ago, the main way that humans interacted with computers was by remembering and typing. Now we look and point -- at words and images, links, icons, menus, windows. The graphical user interface has given the computer to everyone (with enough money) and, combined with the laser printer, has led to more printed paper per capita than ever in human history! The quality of interface design may have peaked around 1990; too many computer screens today are overrun with operating system imperalism, featuritis, marketeering banners, and overproduced gimmicks.
Maya Lin, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, 1985. From a distance the 58,000 dead soldiers arrayed on the black granite yield a visual measure of what 58,000 means, as the letters of each name blur into a gray shape. When the viewer approaches, these shapes resolve into individuals. The focus is on the tragic information; absent are the marble paraphernalia of other official monuments -- big porticoes, steps and stairs, and the kitschy hyper-realistic generic soldiers.
The Internet and Email, 1990-. The greatest dispersion and intensification of information since the printing of books with moveable type in Korea and China around 650. Weaknesses: recency bias, short attention span, low credibility of many documents, low resolution in space and time.
Chris Sells also attended the same one-day Tufte course in summer 2004 and posted his detailed thoughts here:
https://www.sellsbrothers.com/spout/default.aspx?content=archive.htm#My_Day_With_Edward_Tufte
Jeff Atwood on December 8, 2006 02:15 PMSpeaking as someone who works with a bunch of visualization folks, that Viz-o-Matic video is absolutely priceless. I'll have to show that one around the office.
Tyrannicus on December 8, 2006 06:09 PMDo you think that reading his books beforehand made your day more useful, and if so do you think that maybe the included-cost books should be distributed some time before the actual class is held? Or maybe a better question (avoiding monetary issues), would you recommend reading them before attending?
Ben on December 8, 2006 07:44 PM> maybe the included-cost books should be distributed some time before the actual class is held
Technically, they are; the class starts at 10 am, but you can register starting at 8:45 am. The handout indicates that you're supposed to do a bit of reading in the books before the class. Just a few introductory bits.
If you have a choice, I think it's best to come into the class with no exposure at all to Tufte's books. That way you maximize the impact of the material he covers.
Jeff Atwood on December 9, 2006 02:53 PMI wrote this some months ago in Stephen Few's discussion board:
(...) What I find interesting in Tufte is that he builds a theory of information visualization based (among some other things) on some very strong aesthetic principles from minimalism (Mies van der Rohe). The result is very coherent and it gives you a strict and normative way of looking at graphs ("maximize data/ink ratio"; "maximize data density"; "no chart junk", etc.). But design is, by its very nature, a subjective answer. You can't always back it with scientific evidence. You can't anticipate all the logical consequences of your design theory and some of them will collide with scientific findings, sooner or later.(...)
I also see myself as a Tufte fan but are there any other options? Tufte gives us something unique: an holistic theory and metrics to evaluate the results (the full monty...). No one else does that, only some random guidelines. I suspect that Tufte's theory is too positivist and works better inside a simplified reality. I am glad we have him around, but I think we need an alternative view (just in case...).
He is Marx, not Leonardo.
Personally, I find Tufte's work to be beautiful and engaging, but it only scratches the surface of visualisation. I think that Lee Wilkinson's book, The Grammar of Graphics, provides a much stronger theoretical framework, albeit without the emphasis on beauty.
I don't think Tufte provides a holistic theory at all - more of a set of guidelines to follow. Do this, don't do that, etc, but provide very little help for actually figuring out how to display your data to gain insight into the underlying phenomenon.
Hadley on December 10, 2006 07:41 AMHadley, Wilkinson's book is, well... a Grammar. It is very useful, but doesn't prevent you from designing bad charts (he says so somewhere in the book). Likewise, you can't write a good novel just because you know all about the English grammar. For a "stronger theoretical framework" I would skip Wilkinson and go to the source, Jacques Bertin's Semiology of Graphics. Needlessly cryptic, his theoretical framework may be boring from time to time, but you will never draw a futile chart again. For him there is no art in visualization, either.
If you google for visualization guidelines, you will find hundreds of random stuff. Tufte's guidelines are metrics for his aesthetics theory. You will always understand where a guideline comes from because the foundations are very coherent.
Jorge Camoes on December 10, 2006 10:01 AMI attended this same Tufte lecture back in October and was disappointed. My entire thoughts are here: https://www.gearbits.com/archives/2006/10/edward_tufte_se_1.html
Craig on January 3, 2007 07:30 AMTufte is like the Al Gore of the design world: he doesn't debate, nor even answer questions. His courses are a rip-off, akin to buying a hard-cover book and book-on-tape of your favorite author, at the same time.
He doesn't know computers at all, and he thinkgs that computer displays are low resolution. Compared to what? Paper, of course.
Wanna see his definition of good web design? Go to his forum:
https://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/
...which has more text that a typical Slashdot thread. Is that Times New Roman? Yep, it is.
Avoid his pretentious lectures if at all possible. And for god sakes, please don't ask any questions during his all-day lecture. That's just rude.
viz-o-matic is now at https://www.tc.cornell.edu/nr/shared/ctc-main/about/Viz-o-matic.wmv
JCL on November 6, 2008 05:16 AMI went to that course in SF. After his 10th time railing against Microsoft and blaming the Space Shuttle Discovery disaster on PowerPoint, I was pretty much done with the guy. He comes off as an arrogant douchebag. Blaming PowerPoint for Disovery is moronic and akin to blaming the Holocaust on Charles Darwin.
I don't recommend his lectures. Unless you're a Mac fanboy. Then, I'm sure you'll love them.
Dave on December 7, 2008 10:14 PMWent to the December session in San Francisco and came out of it with learning two things:
1. A lot of great little tidbits about design
2. Edward Tufte is a an arrogant, dogmatic man whose intolerance for any views other than his own compromises his intellecutal integrity.
I personally witnessed a poor woman get a tongue lashing during his "office hours" (in which he answers questions and autographs his books at the same time as he is brilliant enough to do both simultaneously) simply because she dared to question one of his particularly extreme views.
Even if the question was "dumb" as he said it was (and it wasn't - she made a good point), she was a fan and a seminar participant and deserved to be treated with more respect and courtesy.
He has good things to say but I am very uncomfortable endorsing anyone who has such contempt for legitimate inquiry and criticism.
Slim on January 6, 2009 04:47 PMContent (c) 2009 Jeff Atwood. Logo image used with permission of the author. (c) 1993 Steven C. McConnell. All Rights Reserved. |