CARVIEW

MOTORHOMES

Select Language

HTTP/2 200 date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 22:40:13 GMT content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 cf-ray: 95ec47de8affc1c4-BLR cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC last-modified: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:33:24 GMT vary: Accept-Encoding x-content-type-options: nosniff strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; preload server: cloudflare content-encoding: gzip [sig-policy] report on prop-050: IPv4 address transfers

[sig-policy] report on prop-050: IPv4 address transfers

To: sig-policy at apnic dot net
Subject: [sig-policy] report on prop-050: IPv4 address transfers
From: Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:44:14 +0900
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
List-archive: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC)
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Below is a summary of discussion on the proposal to date. We
encourage you to continue discussion on the mailing list before
APNIC 25.
Discussion statistics
---------------------
Posted to Policy SIG mailing list:             22 January 2008
Number of posts:                               20
Number of people participating in discussions: 7
Economy of origin of participants:             3 from Australia
                                               3 from Japan
                                               1 from outside AP
Summary of discussion to date
-----------------------------
    - Will organisations that have previously acquired transferred
      addresses come forward and register those transfers if this
      proposal is passed?
    - A desire to have transferred space routed will encourage
      registration under this proposed policy.
    - Registration of resources is one of the key reasons for the
      success and stability of the routing system so far.
    - The proposal allows a prefix to be swapped for another prefix,
      meaning a prefix doesn't need to leave the RIR pool it
      originally came from.
        - For this to work, however, there must be sufficient
          remaining unallocated space in the registry pools.
    - When all IPv4 space has been allocated by the RIRs, there will
      be an increase in NAT use, so why limit the smallest address
      transfer size to /24?
    - An organisation anywhere in the world is free to become a
      member of APNIC. Therefore, any organisation could be a
      recipient of APNIC-delegated space.
    - An organisation that transfers address space to another
      organisation under this proposal could not receive a new
      allocation or assignment from APNIC but could receive a
      transfer of space from another APNIC member.
    - The proposal allows an organisation to transfer part of its
      address block while keeping the rest of it.
Full details of the proposal can be found at:
    https://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-050-v002.html

Original Source | Taken Source