| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 02:50:30 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cf-ray: 95edb6850b6b1ec2-BLR
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
last-modified: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:33:23 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-content-type-options: nosniff
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; preload
server: cloudflare
content-encoding: gzip
[sig-policy] report on prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use addr
[sig-policy] report on prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use addr
- To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
- Subject: [sig-policy] report on prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use address space among LIRs
- From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:14:55 +0900
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- List-archive: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Dear SIG members
Below is a summary of discussion on the proposal to date. We
encourage you to continue discussion on the mailing list before
APNIC 25.
Discussion statistics
---------------------
Posted to Policy SIG mailing list: 28 January 2008
Number of posts: 3
Number of people participating in discussions: 3
Economy of origin of participants: 1 from Australia
1 from Nepal
1 from Zealand
Summary of discussion to date
-----------------------------
- This proposal and the IPv6 ULA addresses concept are similar.
- Networks in other regions are likely to want to use this shared
space. How could APNIC restrict use of the shared use addresses
to the Asia Pacific region?
- If the addresses were to be used globally, then the proposal
should perhaps be an IETF or IANA proposal.
- There would be the same problem of address collisions in the
proposed shared use addresses as there are in RFC 1918
addresses.
- It is unlikely that 'Redesignation of 240/4 from "Future Use"
to "Limited Use for Large Private Internets"' will happen as
it would require major infrastructure changes.
- Expanding private use addresses by designating one /8 as
'shared use' would increase pressure on the remaining IPv4 free
pool.
- If global uniqueness in addressing is desirable, LIRs should
help with the transition to IPv6.
- This proposal only delays the point at which decision makers
realise the situation is critical and results in a far smaller
timeframe in which to transition to IPv6.
Full details of the proposal can be found at:
https://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-058-v001.html
- Prev by Date: [sig-policy] report on prop-057: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
- Next by Date: [sig-policy] report on prop-055: Global policy for the allocation of the remaining IPv4address space
- Previous by thread: [sig-policy] report on prop-057: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
- Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] report on prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use address space among LIRs
- Index(es):