| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:12:00 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cf-ray: 95f1f4b10f3ff473-BLR
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
last-modified: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:33:33 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-content-type-options: nosniff
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; preload
server: cloudflare
content-encoding: gzip
[sig-policy] prop-042: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criter
[sig-policy] prop-042: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criter
- To: sig-policy at apnic dot net
- Subject: [sig-policy] prop-042: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
- From: Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:21:49 +0900
- Cc:
- List-archive: <https://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- Organization: Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC)
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
prop-042: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposal was presented at the APNIC 23 Policy SIG but failed to
reach consensus as opinion was divided on the issue. Therefore, we
are returning the proposal to the mailing list for further
discussion.
Proposal details
----------------
The proposal suggests removing the need to have a plan to make 200
/48 assignments in two years from the initial IPv6 allocation
criteria and replacing it with:
- a plan to make a reasonable number of assignments in two
years
Before APNIC 23, an alternative replacement was suggested:
- a plan to make assignments in two years
Discussion at APNIC 23
----------------------
- Opinion was divided on whether the criteria of a plan to
make 200 assignments in two years was preventing LIRs from
requesting IPv6 address allocations.
- Of the two possible replacement texts, those who supported
changing the criteria preferred the replacement criteria of
"a plan to make assignments in two years".
Next steps
----------
We would like to hear your opinions on this proposal. Here are
some questions that may help start discussion:
- Is this proposal addressing a real need or problem?
- How do you feel about the points made in the APNIC 23
discussions?
- Do you have any alternative solutions that you feel would be
more appropriate?
For more information on the policy proposal, go to:
https://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-042-v001.html
regards,
Toshi
--
Toshiyuki Hosaka
- Prev by Date: RE: [sig-policy] IPv4 countdown policy proposal
- Next by Date: [sig-policy] Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document
- Previous by thread: [sig-policy] Policy SIG meeting yesterday
- Next by thread: [sig-policy] Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document
- Index(es):