CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:36:51 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:26:10 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 05:36:51 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c3c32c2c129dfd
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: MISS
set-cookie: __cf_bm=2WZnuvQJXSENbHKL23i_HbXREG_pnfLK2z2cArS91dA-1760074611-1.0.1.1-aVK0m4UJ5ZPH6xieer_LTO0f1BWRWCcqUhOsjN_gSG4nMZ6cHJET_.KuLYdiXqnT4uVqsTab3uSOo3LhnSHM6U3.cVO2sL4NYEIyuzZdcPg; path=/; expires=Fri, 10-Oct-25 06:06:51 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98c3c32c2c129dfd-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
Attachments Use Cases Summary from David Fallside on 2003-09-17 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2003)
Attachments Use Cases Summary
- From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:50:12 -0700
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF825AEF8C.13E75420-ON88256DA4.007D35A3-88256DA4.007D723D@us.ibm.com>
Here is the consolidated list of use cases for attachments that we have been considering in XMLP WG. Please ref the UC numbers in the titles of any emails. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ======== UC-1, DEFERRED DISCUSSION UNTIL UC-9 UC-10 UC-11 A digital camera wishes to transmit image data over a wireless link using SOAP to a remote server. The binary image data (non-XML) accompanies the message. The digital camera represents a situation in which connections from the receiver to the sender may not be permitted due to device limitations or firewalls. (This is https://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-arch-scenarios-20020730/#S090.) ======== UC-2, IN PROGRESS. Original: An application that uses URI to deref resources, and assumes the only representation travels with the message Reformulation: An application wishes to send a URI in a message, and the receiver will dereference the URI. The sender chooses to "bundle" a representation of the resource in the message as well, so that the receiver may choose this representation when it dereferences the URI. This is useful in cases when the resource identified by the URI is inaccessible to the receiver, or the receiver wants to avoid the overhead of dereferencing the resource over the network, etc. (Original from https://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/03/06-minutes.html. Reformulation based on XMLP WG telcon IRC log from 17 Sept, 2003.) ======== UC-3, DROPPED, 10 Sept 2003. An application that uses middleware/SOAP-stack to deref resources, and assumes the only representation travels with the message. ======== UC-4, IN PROGRESS REFORMULATE AS A REQUIREMENT, 10 Sept 2003. Digital camera wants to encrypt and/or sign the message and/or binary data. ======== UC-5, DROPPED, 10 Sept 2003. Message with binary data successfully goes through SOAP 1.2 intermediary. ======== UC-6, IN PROGRESS. Original: A representation is streamed upon receipt when sender and/or receiver is constrained. Reformulation: An application wants to send one big (but limited) piece of binary data from the sender to the receiver. Either of the parties is limited so it needs to be able to produce/consume the data in a streaming fashion, i.e. the SOAP Envelope must be available with only the streamed binary data being in process of transmission. (Original from https://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/03/06-minutes.html. Reformulation see thread at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Sep/0043.html) ======== UC-7, DROPPED, 17 Sept 2003. WSDL is is applicable where appropriate. ======== UC-8, DROPPED, 17 Sept 2003. Representation is a digital camera produced VLOB. ======== UC-9, NOT YET CONSIDERED. "Undesirable Message Bloat" An application wishes to send a SOAP message that contains a large binary piece of data; e.g., a JPG image, binary executable or other sizeable, non-textual data. For design reasons, this data cannot be referenced externally, but must be transported with the message. Doing so using base64Binary or similar encoding involves an unacceptable message size, due to bandwidth, latency and/or storage requirements. (From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Sep/0008.html) ======== UC-10, NOT YET CONSIDERED. "Undesirable Processing Overhead" An application wishes to send a SOAP message that contains a large binary piece of data; e.g., a JPG image, binary executable or other sizeable, non-textual data. For design reasons, this data cannot be referenced externally, but must be transported with the message. Doing so using base64Binary or similar encoding involves unacceptable message generation and/or parsing overhead, due to throughput requirements, device limitations and/or other considerations. (From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Sep/0008.html) ======== UC-11, NOT YET CONSIDERED. "Focused Intermediaries" An intermediary wishes to process a large message, but only needs to access a small section of the message. For efficient operation, it needs to be able to construct the relevant parts of the message infoset without actually reading and parsing the rest of the message, whilst still being able to successfully forward the entire message. (From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Sep/0008.html) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ............................................ David C. Fallside, IBM Data Management Standards Tel 530.477.7169 (TL 544.9665) fallside@us.ibm.com
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 18:52:54 UTC