CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 04:44:37 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:44:52 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 04:44:37 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98cbb40b4b051712
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: EXPIRED
set-cookie: __cf_bm=s8OgTtvNoboNpZszSZLrwEhUNOhBEf0FIfaSEGjmORI-1760157877-1.0.1.1-pZMrZEJL_UI1A2PAHqvU7y4Wcho0bL2D6Shj05RUf4pAPyZpC3IgooKs829KctaIhdrvOV0vB7_xKzsbKctIsUDHPhfFc500CSGtfbGKQ8o; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 05:14:37 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98cbb40b4b051712-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
LC-3, 4, 5, 8 (your comments on XML Schema) from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen on 2000-10-07 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from October to December 2000)
LC-3, 4, 5, 8 (your comments on XML Schema)
- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 02:39:29 -0600
- To: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20001007023852.021d89a0@espanola.com>
Dear Paul: The W3C XML Schema Working Group has (as I believe you are already aware) spent the last several months working through the comments received from the public on the last-call draft of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments you made on our specification during our last-call comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the last-call comment period have been recorded in our last-call issues list (https://www.w3.org/2000/05/12-xmlschema-lcissues). Our records show that you raised (among others) the points registered in our issues list as LC-3 Why allow divergent order relations? LC-4 Enumerations should inherit ordering from underlying type LC-5 Ordering information is missing LC-8 Integers should not allow non-significant leading or trailing zeroes These issues were classified by the work-group as 'editorial' issues. (Or so the last-call issues list shows. I am puzzled, frankly, by seeing LC-8 show up as editorial instead of as a class-D issue with the others which bear upon single vs. multiple lexical representations.) This class includes both simple typo and bug reports, and suggestions for editorial improvements. The editors of the spec have asked me to thank you (and the many other commentators) for the wealth of detailed editorial suggestions. Many of them they have simply adopted in the text of the specification; some apply to passages which have been completely reworked (and thus may be said to have been overtaken by events); some the editors have decided, upon consideration, not to make; some the editors still intend to make in a later editorial reworking of parts of the spec. The editorial changes made in response to your and other suggestions may be seen in the new public working drafts of the spec, at https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0 (primer) https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1 (structures) https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2 (datatypes) If you are not satisfied with the Working Group's or editors' handling of your suggestions, and would like the relevant decisions reviewed by the Director of the W3C, please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you again for your interest in our specification, and for your assistance in improving it. with best regards, -C. M. Sperberg-McQueen World Wide Web Consortium Co-chair, W3C XML Schema WG
Received on Friday, 6 October 2000 23:02:27 UTC