CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 08:35:08 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:44:52 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:35:08 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98cd05b87bd88cf1
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: EXPIRED
set-cookie: __cf_bm=98oR0bla5fJ6gUkslCp5nP.2mYZC4MUOXjq7fgibA9E-1760171708-1.0.1.1-aNcWEPmHTHqF8l523QZr0tUq20Pq.XPQfmVv5AIAS85YfNmk9twHR90T2_aYDlf52SYW9d6EPIHeoIarErTfqCfCjx7ZWSmCZWU3XWH.QFU; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 09:05:08 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98cd05b87bd88cf1-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
LC-204 (XML Query comments on XML Schema) from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen on 2000-09-21 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2000)
LC-204 (XML Query comments on XML Schema)
- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:47:01 -0600
- To: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20000921124624.01dcbd20@espanola.com>
Dear Paul: The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several months working through the comments received from the public on the last-call draft of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments made by the XML Query WG on our specification during our last-call comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the last-call comment period have been recorded in our last-call issues list (https://www.w3.org/2000/05/12-xml-schema-lcissues). Among other issues, the Query WG raised the point registered as issue LC-204, which suggests that the XML Schema and XML Query WGs plan to work together on the problem of defining type coercion rules for operations on typed values. As I reported to you at the end of June, the XML Schema WG has greeted this proposal with approval and that several WG members have volunteered to serve on a joint task force to work on this issue. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0391 It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director. With best wishes, - C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Dave Hollander Co-chairs, W3C XML Schema WG
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2000 08:52:41 UTC