CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 08:25:07 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:44:51 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 18:41:35 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c840b38f95231f
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=3nqR5jvMJU1PMabe_X6QIf3vBVx3PmMZSEpiX9VQFLw-1760171107-1.0.1.1-tX.fjO.hnp.gIBFVeMidkG0bTkT5mB_QC.f2WFsDAruz0QNvzPMKcSMaCOBkfxwcUyVOMYLwXuLsW5j.VdYi6eMSDWqhGtnGCXtX9NZ.hXs; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 08:55:07 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98ccf70b5fca7679-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
RE: 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur- Type ? from James Tauber on 2000-04-28 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2000)
RE: 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur- Type ?
- From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 05:40:52 -0400
- To: "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B734@mail.bowstreet.com>
> I agree the prose explaining all this is less than satisfactory. I get it totally now that you have explained to me, which seems to suggest that an additional sentence or two in the prose could do a great deal. James
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 05:43:14 UTC