| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 23:48:48 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:44:51 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:48:48 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98ca02b74f92f313
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: EXPIRED
set-cookie: __cf_bm=61eTL9cDIIj.I4wZIgEp0RO7hnkxqp1mFayG1nEwBMk-1760140128-1.0.1.1-eDIKixd8O_rSlUQnQlLs4bTwQm6CjAeg1NpAQka8wqNNd49WD5qEqpzM2FY7M9xva3VOzlttYRMN.0bP8EAum3OZTVIKJXFO16cYUf8fzRc; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 00:18:48 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98ca02b74f92f313-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
Re: 3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary? from Henry S. Thompson on 2000-04-28 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2000)
Re: 3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary?
- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 28 Apr 2000 10:33:33 +0100
- To: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
- Cc: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <f5bpuraa7te.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com> writes: > Why does "absent" in the "Complex Type Definition of the Ur-Type" tableau > (and possibly elsewhere) point to the definition for "null" in the glossary? That's a bug, arising from a late decision to change from 'null' to 'absent'. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: https://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 05:33:37 UTC