| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 23:49:16 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:44:51 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 02:29:54 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c2b1558df2bba0
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=b4hPQgTRdLOCeE4.dU7Lp7VAATLkpxCocd028ClKNgI-1760140156-1.0.1.1-K0gHGxsouoYnJqrLZhVozji2t24aO_edsmTLh8px5e93FNVLqS8dXnsX_xKLxpJJYRUyPQR6znHCffjcMwEnFd_HO693NmlTUB2corUOd5E; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 00:19:16 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98ca0365deafb277-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ? from James Tauber on 2000-04-28 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2000)
3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ?
- From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 04:20:18 -0400
- To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <81A48CA1E953D211B11600A0C9E1C1B995B72F@mail.bowstreet.com>
I thought there used to be a Simple Type Definition of the Ur-Type? Should there be one in 3.13 parallel to the one for Complex Types in 3.4? Or am I missing something? James -- James Tauber jtauber@bowstreet.com Director XML Technology Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 04:22:40 UTC