RE: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1

• From: David E. Cleary <davec@progress.com>
• Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:50:53 -0500
• To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
• Message-ID: <NDBBIOBPAGDGFJAHFCGGGEONCJAA.davec@progress.com>

These may already be noted but we have run into 2 inconsistencies between
the WSDL spec and the SOAP binding schema.
1. Section 3.7 of the WSDL spec states that the soap:header and
soap:headerfault elements take a required 'part' attribute of type NMTOKEN,
but the schema in the spec and at https://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/
state that the attribute is 'parts' and of type NMTOKENS.
2. Section 3.7 of the WSDL spec states that soap:headerfault elements are
optional, but they aren't in the schema both in the spec and at
https://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/.
David Cleary
Progress Software
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:51 AM
> To: Web Service Description
> Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Subject: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I seem to have volunteered myself for collecting an initial list
> of issues against the WSDL 1.1 specification.
>
> I you have any such issue, can you please send them to me asap so
> I can add them to our issues list _before_ our first face-to-face
> meeting?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 15:50:58 UTC