rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 affects WSDL too

• From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
• Date: 25 Nov 2002 12:26:15 -0600
• To: www-tag@w3.org
• Message-Id: <1038248776.5180.181.camel@dirk>

Stuart, Tim, Ian, and everybody,
This might be just a request to tweak the
agenda/issues list at this point; but eventually
we need to do a real round-trip between the TAG
and the WSDL WG on
https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
"At the moment, the only observed place where this
is biting is in XML Schema."
  -- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/24-tag-summary#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
Well, that's no longer the case, as we observed in recent
discussion...
"do: wsdl havea requireent to identify the elements that are
semantically interesting."
-- 2.3 RDDL, namespaceDocument-8
  https://www.w3.org/2002/11/18-tag-summary#RDDL
that requirement is...
"R120
The description language MUST ensure that all conceptual elements in the
description of Messages are addressable by a URI reference"
 -- https://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/
We went on to discuss interactions between namespace
documents, RDDL, RDF, WSDL, mime types, etc.
There's a WSDL scenario (or 2 or 3) that we sorta
discussed... the minutes aren't very clear,
but that's an accurate record of the meeting.
I hope somebody from the WSDL WG will join this
discussion and lay out the scenario(s) clearly.
Or maybe I'll find time to do it. But
right now, I just want to be sure the connection
doesn't get lost.
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C https://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 13:26:14 UTC