| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 23:23:34 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
content-location: 0118.html
vary: negotiate,Accept-Encoding
tcn: choice
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:54:07 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 21:32:54 GMT
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98be789828b1d1e1
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=SDu1m6AmPlW3SMjsxKuL79n22AeGyQcA20taQCbe_8U-1760138614-1.0.1.1-_JTPSW1IsR73R7TxNVB.k0eYzjE3.Qb9erI4qeD66LHOJDWKJnTkT7yW4G4JuPnSZzIF3KasPOt5vhuv3kBzs4Ns6I9BbaLuV6TtGrG56yI; path=/; expires=Fri, 10-Oct-25 23:53:34 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98c9ddc50ed1a9c3-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
IETF XML Mime mailing list archives & XML Protocol working group issues on MIME types from Larry Masinter on 2002-01-16 (www-tag@w3.org from January 2002)
IETF XML Mime mailing list archives & XML Protocol working group issues on MIME types
- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:31:52 -0800
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <006d01c19e68$3fdb2b40$0b78bfd1@larrypad>
In regard to the request from the XML Protocols Working Group for guidelines for W3C working group media types, I will point out a fairly substantial archived discussion of these and related issues at: https://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/ You should consider inviting the editors of RFC 3023 (XML Media Types) to join any discussion of MIME media types for XML bodies. The issue of adding various URIs as parameters for XML media types was discussed in many many many messages; the earliest I can find was the discussion starting in https://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/msg00009.html in April 1999. For what it's worth, I was opposed in 1999 to adding additional parameters to XML-based media types https://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/msg00008.html and I still think it's a bad idea. application/soap+xml still looks pretty good to me. The XML protocol working group has discussed this issue ad naseum (e.g., https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0155.html is one message amongst many threads on the topic.) Larry -- https://larry.masinter.net
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 03:32:30 UTC