| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 20:51:05 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
content-location: 0164.html
vary: negotiate,Accept-Encoding
tcn: choice
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:54:11 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 20:51:05 GMT
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98bdadc84a7700d5
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: REVALIDATED
set-cookie: __cf_bm=GdVsEM2ABMcxeU.6nQWS2ocdg4hS34f0zcqms1Yd_v0-1760129465-1.0.1.1-hrkdUhGwIqPszW2aHQ0QAkdkY4d2d0jLl40tbd1hSDXyNISlwIkwPN_DUwoJG4NGIF7H_yhj5JmmVt.javsaG70jq..lF9JZ3FIsx24KIYA; path=/; expires=Fri, 10-Oct-25 21:21:05 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98c8fe635b24ad8b-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] from Sean B. Palmer on 2002-08-15 (www-tag@w3.org from August 2002)
Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...]
- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:14:17 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, <www-style@w3.org>, <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <02d501c2448f$f639f240$a5570150@localhost>
[+BCC to WAI PF] > I'll leave it to the editor(s) to address your suggestion about > the text of the finding, but it seems to me that just omitting > XSL-FO from that phrase won't address the issue you raise > about whether it's appropriate to use XSL-FO to store > information. > > It looks like a new issue. A new issue for TAG perhaps, but the WAI PF WG have been tackling such issues for a number of months now as part of the work on the XML Accessibility Guidelines. I refer you to checkpoint 2.1 of the current working draft:- https://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xmlgl-20010829#cp2_1 - 2.1 Ensure all semantics are captured in markup in a repurposeable form. XML Accessibility Guidelines W3C Working Draft 29 August 2001 I'm not sure how much of this is an architecural issue rather than accessibility; I suppose that this is for the chairs of the relevant groups to decide. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <https://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <https://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 15:14:28 UTC